The Digital Doubt

What kind of IR was the one you loaded with that Super preset recently? It's a nice change from some of the HX cabs, it has a different character in the lower midrange that is cool and it's not as toppy.

One of my own, IIRC.

These are my set-and-forget live IRs for a whole while by now. One is somewhat brighter, but IIRC, it's just a baked in EQ.
 
The thing with IR's and moveable mics is it is a little like chicken and egg. Do you make an amp choice (let's say EQ) or do you select a different IR or move a mic around.
Traditional recording with cabs etc would be get it to sound good to the player in the room and the engineering side is to capture that sound.
Indeed, if this highlights the challenges a guitarist is having with recording, I would STRONGLY advise finding a partner to do important recording with - could be another guitarist, but in my experience it works even better if they aren’t much of a guitarist.

I don’t have as much opportunity to do this anymore, but I had a buddy that I would call in to “produce” anything I really wanted to capture well. Options paralysis, over analyzing unimportant stuff, etc. stopped when we worked together - when you have to talk through the choices and have someone else in the room saying “what are you doing? That sounds great, let’s just get a good take?” That stuff just falls away. And you start to identify parts of the playing that are better than you realized and hear some minor mistakes that do warrant an extra take or a punch in.

The guitarist acting as own producer and wearing the hat of the player trying to feel the magic and the engineer trying to get a good sound I imagine is where a lot of these problems arise.
 
disagree. At least on the types of amps I use. The tone stack is there mostly to tune the breakup and compression character of the amp. If I’m liking everything about how the amp is responding to my playing, but it’s a little bright, I know not to touch the amp tone stacks but instead turn to the IR and/or post EQ.
But you can do that because you have the experience of how you know what it to respond to your playing. other people may not know that so will go in an endless circle of tweaking which is my point.
 
Just keep hacking away. (y)
We fuss a lot about tone but in reality it's the playing part and/or song that matters even more.

Haha every time I am on the brick of buying some new gear, I hear some player and it discourages to buy anything other than guitar lessons.

Look at that Sayce video. My god. If it’s good enough for him, a modeler (helix, neural cortex or fractal) is def good enough for me.

Same with guitars. Apparently there are people touring with the Player Strat 😂

Better the playing and trust your ears.
 
But you can do that because you have the experience of how you know what it to respond to your playing. other people may not know that so will go in an endless circle of tweaking which is my point.
maybe I’m just wildly impatient but that’s not how it worked for me. Because the point was to actually record something; sometimes with people expecting me to actually do that so they could hear (or even occasionally use!) what I was recording. And so at some point I just determined “well, that’s as good as it’s gonna get” and moved on. No endless circling, just years of guitar sounds that likely could have been better with more knowledge/time/perspective.
 
What's the speaker/cab?

A wild mix. See this post and you might get an idea of what kinda things I did:
 
Look at that Sayce video. My god. If it’s good enough for him, a modeler (helix, neural cortex or fractal) is def good enough for me.

Same with guitars. Apparently there are people touring with the Player Strat 😂

Better the playing and trust your ears.
Sayce is the brand, the chef. The gear are just his ingredients in that moment. He knows how to cook a nice dish with whatever he's got because he trusts his skills.
I'm hungry now. :grin
 
A wild mix. See this post and you might get an idea of what kinda things I did:
Oh ok, that's cool.
Sounds like the process worked out good for you. (y)
Not sure I will go down that road myself, although it intrigues me.
 
Not sure I will go down that road myself, although it intrigues me.

It's actually not *that* tough once you have a good handful of "ballpark" IRs. Set up some of them parallely, so you can easily mix them, look for the "best" frequency performance in each of them (some may have nice mids but boomy lows or highs perceived as phase-y, whatever), EQ them so the nice portions stand out, then mix and match. Then use some Match EQ for the final tweaks.
I actually happened to like the process because it taught me a whole lot.
 
It's actually not *that* tough once you have a good handful of "ballpark" IRs. Set up some of them parallely, so you can easily mix them, look for the "best" frequency performance in each of them (some may have nice mids but boomy lows or highs perceived as phase-y, whatever), EQ them so the nice portions stand out, then mix and match. Then use some Match EQ for the final tweaks.
I actually happened to like the process because it taught me a whole lot.

But are you able to play “happy birthday”?

😄
 
Back
Top