State of Epicicity
Shredder
- Messages
- 1,012
I'm curious which YouTube guitar channels generally have the best tone? YouTube's algorithms keep recommending the same people, but I'm interested in finding more.
Jim Gaustad nails the early EVH tone.I'm curious which YouTube guitar channels generally have the best tone?
Dunno about new, but Paul from The Studio Rats consistently pulls amazing tones out of devices that I cannot.
I look forward to his posts on the Fractal Forums, they are always great!David Levi - killer blues player and sweet tones
Euge Valovirta might have the meanest sounding 800 on the tube and his tones are always dope, Kyle Bull, Leon Todd, BouGear, Johan Segeborn, Killertonetexas, Lasse Lammert, Mendel bij de Leij,, RezaMatix, Ed S. (who is MirrorProfiles here as someone has mentioned) and Zach Wish are among my favourites
I used Google for ages because it provided relevant searches but now find that DuckDuckGo is often more reliable. Google seems to heavily favor advertisements and stores in its search results, where a manufacturer of a product get absolutely buried by stores that sell said product.One more addendum to my rant: Google gained dominance over search by providing the most relevant searches, by honing its algorithms to the most intuitive and least time wasting layout of information, results one can usually trust to be relevant to what you actually wanted to find. They are so advertiser focused now it diminishes that, but it still is gold standard, so much so that AI search is vying simply to equal it.
But YouTube? I would never guess from using it that it's owned by Alphabet. It makes me think less of the parent company overall. I don't use social media like the Meta products for personal use; I don't enjoy it. And YouTube feels like a trash heap version of that stuff: click bait titles with bold neon and someone making a stupid face, which is meant to entice you, when it completely repels me.
When my searches are not tone based, I've taken recently to using a YouTube transcript extraction website simply to skim the text and try to get right to the meat of the substance.
When I first started listening to podcasts, I found a trend where a show looked interesting, but then someone who had prepared nothing talked about their weekend for five minutes at the top of the show, before sauntering lazily into the substance. Luckily I've found many great podcasts since then.
But with podcasts I'm not fighting the platform itself. YouTube feels like a florescent colored gauntlet with hidden gems, but wrapped in kids' candy wrappers.
Social media companies hired psychologists who consult casinos in how to keep people inside and starting at a display, and I think their architecture is nowhere more naked than YouTube.
The library thing might be the best analogy I have ever heardI find it completely perplexing that YouTube doesn't recommend many of these channels to me. Instead they recommend either the same few people over and over, then a bunch of the stupidest looking videos that have nothing to do with what I searched for. It's like the goal is to distract you and piss you off. I always feel like I've entered a huge library, but assholes keep coming up to me flicking flyers in my face when I'm trying to learn something. I truly feel like the algorithm is meant to dull the intellect.
These recommendations are a treasure trove to me. Ironically I've only had time so far to check out Studio Rats, and that one dude is freaking awesome. I mean, tone to die for, nuanced playing, and he seems cool.
The thing that truly destroys me is when I feel like someone you're going to for information feels like a used car salesman.