Boudoir Guitar
Rock Star
- Messages
- 2,959
Pulled this straight from the Kemper Facebook feed, so they seem to get it (I kid, I kid...I love Kemper. And would certainly never judge anyone for having sucht dich)
100% Agree.Nobody here is saying the Kemper can't get the job done.
What is trying to be said is the Kemper does not accurately capture amps compared to the competition it now faces.
Does that mean you need to stop playing your Kemper. No. To be honest, probably 99 percent of the people on this forum (me included) have no idea what a cranked Plexi into a Marshall cab sounds like in real life. So if I buy a profile pack for a cranked Plexi into a Marshall cab, who am I to say "this doesn't sound like my amp"? The kemper is fine if you want to buy 3rd party profiles. But if you want to buy a Kemper to profile your own gear, there are currently better options out there.
I'll translate in Sicilian dialect: kemper sucaminchiaI'm not translating that.
I actually translated the Kemper post (Kemper Seeks You!!), but I'm not about to translate that...I'll translate in Sicilian dialect: kemper sucaminchia
The big issue with Tonex and NAM is the lack of a reference I/O level for capturing and playing profiles (as extensively discussed on this same forum), so if you don't account for that, the potential gain in accuracy goes out the windowFWIW I had a Tonex too, and I think the Tonex did a worse job of capturing than the Kemper did-
Yeah, mid hump = cocked wah for me.
Come on, don't be picky... we all know (I hope) that a wah is a narrow bandpass filter, obviously a kemper profile isn't that, but often has that mid hump that resembles a cocked wah mixed with the signal. Pretty sure everyone who mentions it means thatHave you ever actually listened to a cocked wah? Should I record some bits for you?
Come on, don't be picky... we all know (I hope) that a wah is a narrow bandpass filter, obviously a kemper profile isn't that, but often has that mid hump that resembles a cocked wah mixed with the signal. Pretty sure everyone who mentions it means that
Next time I'll have a kemper in my hands I'll try to produce them, but it might not be an easy task since it could be a by-product of its non-linearities.I know what is meant, same is said about Boss' modeling. Just that I really don't exactly agree. If that mid hump was real, I'm sure there'd be graphs. Are there any?
Anyway, don't you hear a difference in the upper-mids between the first and third sample in the OP?
They are looking for logistical personal…as I read it...prmary focus on their shipping.I'm not translating that.
If I’m correct @Sascha Franck is a native speaker..so I might get corrected
Yeah, very familiar. I never had a capture come out with the gain sounding like the actual amp.The big issue with Tonex and NAM is the lack of a reference I/O level for capturing and playing profiles (as extensively discussed on this same forum), so if you don't account for that, the potential gain in accuracy goes out the window
I like to consider myself a professional lagerist, but not in the literal translation of the word...I'm not translating that.