HomespunEffects
Shredder
- Messages
- 1,473
I'm going to be honest with you. I don't know which I tried. I'm thinking it was 50 watts but can't say for sure.50 or 100w?
I'm going to be honest with you. I don't know which I tried. I'm thinking it was 50 watts but can't say for sure.50 or 100w?
If it was about 2 feet wide it was the 50. If it was almost as big as the room it was the 100; damn things are huge.I'm going to be honest with you. I don't know which I tried. I'm thinking it was 50 watts but can't say for sure.
50 then.If it was about 2 feet wide it was the 50. If it was almost as big as the room it was the 100; damn things are huge.
XXX are good cabs. Going to a Marshall is not much of an upgrade, the construction is exactly the same.I haven't loved V30s. I like 75s better, but unknown which is better with this amp. The XXX is supposed to be Peavey's v30, but its not as sharp as a V30 and sounds like it has more bottom, so not the same thing.
Thanks. Notice anything tone wise?With my very limited experience with it, it could have been preconceived bias. I do tend to automatically like EL34 amps (I'm a Marshall guy, deep down).
Just exploring the best (for me) direct Marshall tones available. Someday I hope to have the absolute best (to me) Plexi, 800, modified 800 and 900 direct tones available.All this time in the IR-X/J threads, I didn't know you had a 5153 and a JVM410H. What was the purpose of getting the friedman box if you already have the JVM?
I can see wanting to add some Marshall channels to the 5153. When I ran the IR-X into the Ironheart power section it was smoother than a Marshall, but again it is a 2x6L6 power into a Peavey cab so I dunno.
I really love the 5153 but if I later want to add Marshall tones, I might get a JIMS 800 pedal.
I second this.I don't love the EVH cabs. Favorite has been a Mesa 4x12. You might consider a speaker swap instead of a new cab. I've found V30s (ordered from Mesa's site...they're different than others, even other UK made) and Creambacks to be a great combo.
My experience with the 100w head was that without the resonance knob it did not have the low end of either the 6L6 or EL34 50w heads.For sure. For someone with the ability to play a little louder, I bet the 100W is more satisfying. While the 50W has midi and resonance knob, I think the 100W is probably more complete with a larger bottom. I don't think it has anything to do with it being 50W, I think they just designed it to be a tight little instant gratification machine.
I use it primarily as a variable “loudness” at low/home levels for a fuller sound. I’m not sure if I would use it at stage volume since I haven’t had that opportunity recently.I keep the resonance off in my Stealth. I don't like that woof on top of the core tone.
Yeah I've owned both and guess which one I still own? The 100w head had a fullness to it, but it was subtle. The 50w has way more gain, and is more versatile due to the additional gain and res knob. I kept the 50w. They really are workhorse amps.That's interesting. It could be that when they redesigned with the 50w, they just made it a better amp. It is still tight even with the resonance up, at least by my frame of reference. You just raise the bass and presence and bam there is your perfect metal sound.
I wouldn't spend 2-2.5K on a 100W amp without a resonance or midi at this point, even if it is a better amp.
You shouldn't need to put the gain on a 5153 red channel to half.Ugh... The seeds of doubt are forming and rather quickly. I'm starting to fall out of love with this amp. Chances of keeping it are below 50% now. The only things really keeping me from sending it back today are that I don't want to abuse the MF return policy and because it does ONE thing very well.
I spend all my time doing Paul Gilbert and Andy James style playing. So the most important thing is the pick attack and the sound of the solo notes. The problem with the 5150III, is that the individual notes oscillate to the n'th degree. Everyone who plays distorted lead guitar knows what this is (and I can probably look it up on google and with 30 minutes of research pretend to be an expert on the topic -- it is probably intermodulation distortion). But the 5153, maybe more specifically *this* amp (maybe they vary?), does it to a distracting degree. You hang an individual note and it pulses and oscillates in way to distract from the fundamental tone, almost demanding and forcing me to play vibrato to hide it. And of course every note does it to a different degree and speed. This is with the red channel with gain on half.
I have thought it might be poorly intonated guitar but I'm cycling through all the guitars within reaching distance and they all do it to the same degree.
The other thing, and probably related, is that the pick attack is not as clear and definite. It seems to take up more volume, but also it is not well defined. Its more of a thud than it is a click. I like that the notes are more saturated, but they also have a ton of jank in them.
Also, going back and forth between the Ironheart and the 5153, its clear that the 5153 has one tonal signature. The ONE thing the 5153 does well is saturated metal POWER CHORDS, no one can deny. But there is a mid "honk" that gives it this ability. Its always there, even when you scoop the mids. So its great when you are chugging power chords, but it is ALWAYS THERE when soloing or playing anything.
I can get the Ironheart to do the 5153 thing with an SD1 and right EQ settings on the lead channel, but its not built in like it is with the 5153. I can also loosen up the Ironheart and I can't do that with the 5153.
And then also, the amp is just lacking creature comforts. Its a 2/3rds size amp that needs concentric pots, has tiny channel selectors that interfere with the channel volumes, doesn't have a master volume, the resonance is on the back. It has midi but that doesn't make up for all the compromises. Its 1/2 the price of most current amps because it is half an amp.
It may be that this particular amp is suffering more than normal from the oscillations. The fundamental problem for me is that the solo notes sound janky and that makes it difficult to put up with the compromises. The Laney shows its possible to have clear and defined high gain lead notes.
I feel like an asshole for wanting to return this, but I also wasn't expecting it to have so much jank built into the notes. I don't remember this shit from the JSX. I don't think its an unavoidable feature of high gain amps with layered distortion. The reason I sold the JSX was because it lacked versatility, not because the solo notes were lacking.
Might be your pickups are too high, too close to the strings. This can cause weird artifacts like you describe because the magnet is affecting the vibration of the string.All amps do it to a certain degree. Do you know what I am referring to? Its just very pronounced with this amp.
When I see the word oscillation, I think of an unintentional, solid, prolonged, pitched tone accompanying whatever sound you are intentionally making? Are you sure its not ghosting (weird intervaled tones that move with your notes) or perhaps abnormally pronounced intermodulation distortion where you might hear notes "beating"? The later two COULD be tube or bias related.You can't hear the note pulse/ oscillate? When you play distorted notes above 12th fret, it doesn't pulse at all? It could be the intonation on all my guitars is off? Other amps do this a little bit, but the 5150 does it alot.