TheTrueZoltan!
Shredder
- Messages
- 1,802
Nah, that was 2021, not 2022.Petrucci Archetype also launched 2 1/2 months ago. How time flies...
Nah, that was 2021, not 2022.Petrucci Archetype also launched 2 1/2 months ago. How time flies...
I could take the Plini, Nolly, Petrucci, Soldano SLO, or probably this one and it would already do about 95% of what I would want. Good cleans and mid-to-high gain overdrive.but those tones have already available pretty much else for years now.
NDSP alone has multiple plugin options covering these series of amps.
Oh well, I'm really glad someone bought the Petrucci plugin from me yesterday., just in time before the "full" IIC plugin came out today. I guess the market value of the Petrucci plugin just dropped quite a bit. ;-)
So like QC owners people could currently make a copy of whatever settings they come up with during the free trial period at no cost with any of the NDSP plugins using the Tonex platform, correct?
Given that someone is comfortable with a snapshot of a digital emulation.
Absolutely. There have been plenty of NeuralDSP plugin captures on QC. It's a bit silly but one way to do it in absense of better options.So like QC owners people could currently make a copy of whatever settings they come up with during the free trial period at no cost with any of the NDSP plugins using the Tonex platform, correct?
Given that someone is comfortable with a snapshot of a digital emulation.
Nah, that was 2021, not 2022.
It would certainly be an interesting comparison to see if they are just reskinned versions of the same fx. Would not be surprised.Just went through the manual, and somethinig immediately jumped at me. It's subtle, but see if you can spot any patterns here.
View attachment 4637
I wonder how many times the exact same FX algorithms were repackaged across plugin suites.
Ultimately, the IIC+ is an amp I'm never going to own and its a perfect candidate to use in a plugin format. If Mesa are on board too, its even better. Its fun to complain but really, how f*****g lucky are we to have so many options available that relatively speaking, cost nothing. and we are even blessed to be able to pick emulations for a number of companies.
I’m not into that strategy, but I wonder how that’s going to start impacting things going forward in this domain.True but I honestly was underwhelmed by every single plugin capture I found on the Cloud, and the ones I tried to make myself came out even worse.
It would certainly be an interesting comparison to see if they are just reskinned versions of the same fx. Would not be surprised.
I could take the Plini, Nolly, Petrucci, Soldano SLO, or probably this one and it would already do about 95% of what I would want. Good cleans and mid-to-high gain overdrive.
Having plugin versions of all kinds of amps is fun but certainly not by any means necessary.
It does suck. And it isn't surprising.
Although, the next step in fulfilling the doomsday prophecies would have NDSP finally adding plugin support to QC, so they can charge guys like me for the content I was supposed to have gotten for free. Which some folks would consider a mixed blessing, at least?
Just went through the manual, and somethinig immediately jumped at me. It's subtle, but see if you can spot any patterns here.
View attachment 4637
I wonder how many times the exact same FX algorithms were repackaged across plugin suites.
Oh hey they misspelled "Presence":
It's that Mesa Kool-Aid talking!Post ToneX, with an endless ever-growing library of tones, and wait does it even include Amplitube5?, why would anyone ever consider spending a hundred bucks or more for a handful of tones .. maybe half that during a sale ..As an owner of five of their plugs, bargain has never been a word I associate w ndsp.