Most people that still hang on to this kind of anti-L6 prejudice because they seriously thought in 1997 some combo amp with bright lights was going to replace a wall full of cranked Marshalls. Probably would have been a good thing for everyone if they would have known to temper their expectations a little bit at the timeI think Line 6 has done a really good job making products that engage both lazy and involved people. I still see a lot of āI just bought x modeler and it sounds like shitā and when you ask they never made it off the first bank of factory presets, have no idea what kind of sound they were looking for, made no attempt to dial anything in, and are also somehow monitoring it through the built-in speakers on their laptop.
This is totally missing the point I'm afraid. I can't really comment aside from those guys circuits have nothing to do with the hype knob. If their circuits were modelled, then I'd want an accurate model, not a cartoonish approximation of what people think they might sound like.But are people buying or using X amp because it is X amp or are they buying or using X amp because they love the tone where Y artist used X amp on whatever seminal record? If you don't know for sure, ask the Jose Arrendondo estate, Dave Friedman, Reinhold Bogner, Scott Splawn, Mark Cameron, David Bray, Lee Jackson, Mike Fortin, Dan Gower, Jens Kruse, Jason Tong.....
I'm pretty sure these gents ain't making a living making amps that sound "like the real" Plexi or JCM800.
There is a key difference. If you make these adjustments, you are doing it purposefully and with a specific intention. Any kind of knob that is along the lines of "betterizing" is a different approach. My point is there are no shortcuts to bettering the tone, it might change it a bit but there's tons of ways to change the tone to your needs. Its like I mentioned about mix ready IR's - with no context, how can they be a step in the right direction?Do you feel the same about Fractal allowing you to swap tonestacks, tubes, and change voltages and other topographical components? Because that also implies that the amp - as is - isn't good enough.
My issue is really that if someone can't dial a tone they like with an accurate model, a hype knob will just lead them to a different version of a bad tone. Maybe that's helpful or what some people want, but I can't really understand it for my needs. And yeah, with Fractal and Line 6, the first thing I do is remove presets and cab IR's that I don't want getting in the way. I'd customise any gear I possibly can for my needs, as would anyone else. I really don't see it as a good idea or groundbreaking, accurate modelling is sufficient IMO. I don't mind people disagreeing either, but I also don't expect a hype knob to be a big deal for them.I just don't understand the "I'm not going to use this feature, so I'd rather it not be in the device AT ALL. Its very presence offends me!" mindset I've seen from you and a few others here. Any modern multi-FX modeler will offer models and capabilities that won't be used by any given user. Like, no one buys a Fractal and regularly uses 350+ models. Or uses all the factory presets. Or uses both performance pages all the time.
Maybe L6 could release a Pod version with three controls. Up and down to choose the amp and then one huge hype knob dead center under the display. Tweak and Jam. Headphone out only. Amp in the head tones for days.
This is totally missing the point I'm afraid. I can't really comment aside from those guys circuits have nothing to do with the hype knob. If their circuits were modelled, then I'd want an accurate model, not a cartoonish approximation of what people think they might sound like.
There is a key difference. If you make these adjustments, you are doing it purposefully and with a specific intention. Any kind of knob that is along the lines of "betterizing" is a different approach. My point is there are no shortcuts to bettering the tone, it might change it a bit but there's tons of ways to change the tone to your needs. Its like I mentioned about mix ready IR's - with no context, how can they be a step in the right direction?
My issue is really that if someone can't dial a tone they like with an accurate model, a hype knob will just lead them to a different version of a bad tone. Maybe that's helpful or what some people want, but I can't really understand it for my needs. And yeah, with Fractal and Line 6, the first thing I do is remove presets and cab IR's that I don't want getting in the way. I'd customise any gear I possibly can for my needs, as would anyone else. I really don't see it as a good idea or groundbreaking, accurate modelling is sufficient IMO. I don't mind people disagreeing either, but I also don't expect a hype knob to be a big deal for them.
The crux of the issue is "warts and all" is assumed as bad and "pleasing to the ear" is EXTREMELY context dependent AND subjective. Without taking into account context or the users preferences, there's a massive limit on how much it can improve anything compared to just dialling in what you want yourself.
I totally agree with this and I donāt expect Line 6 to build a device to a narrow audience, especially one with my viewsI was going to do another detailed response, but didn't see the point. I can only say you are definitely one type of customer. There are others, and choices in how they go about using the unit will almost never be detrimental in and of themselves.
I totally agree with this and I donāt expect Line 6 to build a device to a narrow audience, especially one with my views
All Iāve said is why I think itās not a particularly exciting feature to me and that I probably wonāt use it, as well as stating why I donāt think itās useful. Obviously no user is going to have the same feelings toward every feature, and thereās nothing wrong with different opinions on it.
A hype knob to me would be way more interesting if it could work in a negative direction, or if you could have more control over what is being affected. But, whatever, itās not for users like me and if people think itās helpful to them, then crack on.
My experience has generally been tones suffer from too much processing rather than too little. And things designed at a more āmix ready/pleasingā sound often cause more problems than they solve. Maybe my opinion will change once Iāve used it, but itās not a problem Iāve ever encountered before so maybe thatās why the solution is hard to understand?
Youāre being grossly reasonable for this thread. Itās quite arousing, sexually I meanā¦Maybe let's wait until we hear it for ourselves on a few amps?
My issue isn't with the sound (because thats always subjective) and purely with the approach. Being able to modify sounds is a good thing, and a big advantage of digital. I'd just prefer it to be done in a different way than a single knob.Maybe let's wait until we hear it for ourselves on a few amps?
I have original Helix backpack and I think it is pretty nice, so I can see how the 2.0 bag would be even nicer. Speaking of which, I assume the new Stadiums do fit in the old bag? I read somewhere that they don't, but that doesn't make any sense unless the Stadiums are incredibly tall? I've only seen width and depth measurements, but based on photos it looks like the Stadiums might be shallower than the original Helix Floor?Dude, allow me to gush a bit. Helix Stadium Backpack might be the most well-designed and well-thought-out thing Line 6 has ever made. Other than a couple of suggestions, I had nothing to do with it; that was all Dale and he knocked it out of the park.
My issue isn't with the sound (because thats always subjective) and purely with the approach. Being able to modify sounds is a good thing, and a big advantage of digital. I'd just prefer it to be done in a different way than a single knob.
I clearly have no issue with the sound because I have no idea what it does, and honestly, even if it's sold as an improvement, the reality is its just going to offer something different (which can be achieved in any number of ways). Whatever hype does on any particular amp will depend on so many things that no one can have a blanket opinion over how it sounds. The method of how it achieves what it's doing? I think thats fair enough to discuss.
(not aimed at you) is it really an issue if I'm not excited by one tiny new feature? No user is going to enjoy every aspect of everything, and nor should they.
I'd just prefer it to be done in a different way than a single knob.
Missing the critical next-gen Hype control. Maybe with all the clamor for it, theyāll put it on the MKII and get rid of the other non-essential knobs. One can only hope. Oh and quit it with the Behringturd level enclosure!
Thatās essentially the deep advanced menu in the FractalI think the thing that would concern me about a Hype knob is that I'd want the person who is defining the Hype adjustment parameters and what they are doing overall to have ears that align with mine. Which is a tall if not impossible order, imo. I do think it will be a selling feature for someone new to modeling that wants to give L6 a try.
Replace that with I tried the
Hell Hath No Fury Like A Stadium Scorned