Line 6 Helix Stadium Pre-Launch Discussion

You are not king of the world so you don't get to decide what other people do and do not use AI for. There are a lot of people, including a lot of creatives who are already using AI to help them create things they never could do before. You aren't going to get them to stop and you aren't going to stop other people from starting. You are just fighting a war that you already lost. Pointless.

Sascha is indeed correct on a lot of his points about AI - but the fact is - the genie's out of the bag now. Ain't going back in.

We have to learnt to live with the consequences - and many of them will not be so positive in the long run.
 
just as an aside, I ended up as a developer instead of a musician 40+ years ago. Over these past 40 years I've been going to lose my job to fancy new tech a zillion times. Each time, I just learned the new tech and kept on working. AI is just like that. Either be the person making AI do it's thing or not. Doesn't matter if it's Quantum logic gates, or trinary operators, if you just accept new shit happens you'll be fine.
Competent, versatile staff will outlast those who let their skills atrophy, obviously. But let's not overlook the inherent problem: if AI works as advertised, fewer and fewer human developers will be needed, competent or otherwise.

And it's not as if we're only talking about software developers' jobs here. Nor are we talking about especially long timelines. (Nor have we even started talking about a computing paradigm that vastly increases our carbon footprint rather than reducing it - an about face at the worst possible time, in a field that has otherwise embraced miniaturization and efficiency.)

I agree we've already passed the point of no return with AI. And I agree that it will likely do a lot of good (in fields like medicine, materials engineering, etc.) But after that? Things will probably get worse before they get better. How much worse and how much better... That all depends on decisions we make as a species within, effectively, the blink of an eye. (It concerns me that we don't really make decisions "as a species" at all, let alone good ones.)

On a lighter note. I still want a Helix Stadium. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
 
You are not king of the world so you don't get to decide what other people do and do not use AI for. There are a lot of people, including a lot of creatives who are already using AI to help them create things they never could do before. You aren't going to get them to stop and you aren't going to stop other people from starting. You are just fighting a war that you already lost. Pointless.
Things they couldn’t create or things they could, just faster? I have no expectations of stopping AI, but I do think “art” in any capacity should be watermarked for AI unless it was a closed model ONLY trained on an artist work for them to use.
 
Hey thanks buddy!! I had no idea not to be afraid of everything coming. I’ve only been doing it for 25 years, so I guess it’s better late than never.
Fun-fact: the people most worried about AI are the people who created it. But what do they know?

1763057805807.png


(I think part of the problem is we're all discussing different subjects, really - talking past one another. One guy is worried about whether AI should be dabbling in the arts, the next is worried about bad code, the next is confident he'll keep his job so no worries at all... All things relating to where we're at right now. Well, we just got here. Blink and we're somewhere else. How about five or ten or maybe twenty years down the road, when we're looking at the socio-economic fallout of having coexisted with technology that's better than we are at almost everything, owned by oligarchs we never elected, consuming enormous amounts of electricity, etc. etc. etc.?)
 
Last edited:
And because of that, we will have to resist as long as possible and whenever possible. Especially in any creative areas.

People are basically becoming cockroaches...forget about fighting anything. It's a race to the bottom.

I was pointing out that you are correct in your assessment - but truth be told, there's little that can be done about it in terms of any 'organized resistance'. The best you can do is to put out something with that human touch and hope that people still relate to that at some level.
 
And as said above: We're just giving away our cultural heritage for nothing (but a little bit of quick success for a handful of folks).
In a very small amount of years, we'll be flooded with movies starring Charlie Chaplin as the new 007 and Marilyn Monroe as the new Bond girl, with Fritz Lang being the director and the score being created by a mixture of Hans Zimmer and the Sex Pistols. And it will all look and sound absolutely real.
And all of this will be churned out more or less for the f*** of it, using massive sums of electricity, while taxpayers (mostly unawares) foot the bill and suffer the effects of the resulting pollution.

AI could (and should) be used to adress hunger, poverty, solve scientific problems, research medicines and what not. But it should be kept out of anything creative, FFS.
Anything creative, anything non-essential. Right now, among other things, it's being used as a virtual pal/ therapist all around the world, sometimes with terrible outcomes. But even where the outcome is neutral-to-good, there's an enormous cumulative cost. In general, I think this technology was democratized too quickly. It should have been kept in the proverbial lab a bit longer, while we answered a couple of practical and ethical questions about its potential.

And because of that, we will have to resist as long as possible and whenever possible. Especially in any creative areas.
Don't hate me for this: I'm also concerned about the implications in music and the arts, but I expect we'll quickly arrive at a place where these are the least of our concerns.
 
Last edited:
I don’t know. I tried to subtly redirect but we saw how effective that was, LOL.
I'll start an AI thread in the Water Cooler sub. Maybe this will help:



(I should have predicted: no one wants to talk about AI in an actual AI thread. We're just like cats LOL.)
On topic: I still really want a Stadium. :beer
 
Last edited:
The best you can do is to put out something with that human touch

The main issue being that AI "art" is almost indistinguishable from human art. And by that I mean the actual content, not the sound (or visual quality or whatsoever). I've listened to some Suno stuff that I actually thought of being pretty intelligently made pop music. If at all, the arrangements are still a bit lame, but the individual parts sometimes are pretty incredible already.

Now, we could of course just say that good music is good music, regarless of whomever created it. And for any folks being consumers only, it's possibly just like that. But anyone being a musician (regardless of their proficiency level) should be all up in arms, simply because the process of creating music is an incredibly vital part of the entire package. In fact, for myself it's the most important part. I enjoy playing (and kinda composing/arranging) music *much, much* more than listening to the finished product. And that's something AI is actively running into the ground. More than enough of a reason to hate it.
 
Back
Top