People love to hate Black Angus, but it takes pedals well and maybe the problem isn't the Tone Model after all? See below (skip to 1:48 if the link doesn't put you right there) where Giacomo Castellano has no problem using it:
in this context I’d say it’s a bad (IMO) tone that sounds somewhat interesting because of the playing. You could run that DI through basically anything and it would sound interesting I think. Maybe even parts like that benefit from a weirder more distinctive tone?
I don’t like the tone though, and I don’t play or record guitar parts like that. For someone else it might be perfect.
Aside from that post totally missing the mark on what the actual issue above was, I think the problem with Black Angus isn’t so much that it’s a bad tone (tone is subjective and context dependent) but more that:
- it just happens to be the first tone in the list, and whenever someone loses their specific setting, this just happens to be the one they get. Any unexpected tone is probably going to sound wrong
- it’s a Marshall with Angus in the name, so people will think “oh, this’ll sound like AC/DC”. So you play AC/DC style stuff and it doesn’t sound good. It’s kind of like having a Randy Rhodes inspired tone and then called it “AAAAAARON AAAAARDVARK plays John Mayer Clean tone”. In the right context it could sound cool, but the name puts an expectation in peoples minds, and any preset that comes first by default is going to get more attention. Probably safer to have some kind of a generic clean tone as the default than something that requires a style of playing like that to make sense.
The post is the most beautifully textbook response of reacting defensively and confrontationally without caring to understand the actual issue in the discussion. So often an IK response to any issue or bug report being “nope, you’re just using it wrong”.