From: Neural DSP, re: s o o n... (Archetype Tom Morello)

The 2205 is has more in common with a JCM900 than a 2203 from what I see in the schematic. :idk
Normal channel is quite nice in these, especially with a boost. Still, not as nice as a 2203/2204 IMO but they're quite cool. I think I overall preferred my 2210 to Jubilee.
I've since sold both amps, but have ToneX models of both. Morello plugin instantly sounds just like my 2210 models (go figure). I have the Nembrini plugin still, haven't used it a great deal but I imagine the Neural is going to feel nicer under the fingers (even though these Marshall's aren't the nicest feeling) than I found with that one.
 
One of the few Marshall amps I’ve got zero interest in when it comes to acquiring a digital version. The Henson has a pretty good 800.

…also the Nolly.
 
Last edited:

Very quick A/B with Nembrini MRH810 and one of my ToneX models from a 2210. Neural seems to have some slightly different behaviours with the channel and master volume and overall its brighter/fizzier. Guessing it could be related to Tom's amp being a different revision (those amps were plagued with shitty PCB designs and underwent revisions during production), but also it could be down to the load used, or bias/valves. Not sure I like the low end on Neural's one too much either, it gets a bit wild quickly in an odd way.

I think ToneX scratches the itch well enough for me, and Nembrini is close enough if I feel the need to tweak more. I think you'd REALLY have to love Tom Morello and/or 2205's to pay over £100 for this (for the amp sounds I mean). Crunch channel is pretty nice actually (max the volume out). I like the NDSP amp reverb more than Nembrini but ultimately it’s nothing to write home about.

Included IR’s aren’t for me. FX are fun for about 5 seconds and then I never want to hear them ever again.

I think both plugins do the 2210/2205 thing well enough if thats what you're after though.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top