Fractal Audio Systems mystery product speculation

What is it not it is? Is it?

  • None of the above

  • Electric sex pants

  • Unsliced Bread

  • JiveTurkey's resolve to "innovate" with audio signal routing

  • Lab grown "safe & guilt-free" toe meat


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.
The revelation that the VP4 is using a TI DSP is huge news IMO.

I believe the Axe-Fx III uses a TMS320C6672 (1.5Ghz for the Turbo, 1.25Ghz for the normal) so it's possible the VP4 uses a TMS320C6671 (1GHz?)

If so, that's a pin-compatible version of the DSP in the Axe-Fx III - so Fractal will ship a board design with that DSP that fits in a VP4 size enclosure.

What could that mean for a future FM3/FM9? :rollsafe
Makes sense to go full-TI and ditch the Sharc. Would make it a hell of a lot simpler to port firmware between each unit.
 
Is there a hardware limitation for the unit to run an amp blocks? Asking on behalf of @Whizzinby ;)


giphy.gif
 
The revelation that the VP4 is using a TI DSP is huge news IMO.

I believe the Axe-Fx III uses a TMS320C6672 (1.5Ghz for the Turbo, 1.25Ghz for the normal) so it's possible the VP4 uses a TMS320C6671 (1GHz?)

If so, that's a pin-compatible version of the DSP in the Axe-Fx III - so Fractal will ship a board design with that DSP that fits in a VP4 size enclosure.

What could that mean for a future FM3/FM9? :rollsafe
The VP4 uses a SoC. It has an ARM Cortex A15 core and a C66x core along with a bunch of peripherals. The DSP in the Axe-Fx III would be too power-hungry for this application.
 
Looks like a looper and IR block is in the cards for a future update, so I'm sure the midi thing can be addressed as well.

What's the likelihood that it can run two looper blocks?

How much looping time, free memory, does the VP4 have?
 
What's the likelihood that it can run two looper blocks?

How much looping time, free memory, does the VP4 have?
A looper has been mentioned as a possibility in a future update , whether its a block or add on to the current four is unknown.
Time, memory etc only Fractal knows.
 
The VP4 uses a SoC. It has an ARM Cortex A15 core and a C66x core along with a bunch of peripherals. The DSP in the Axe-Fx III would be too power-hungry for this application.
What made you choose this over Analog Devices offerings? Just easier to port stuff?
 
I’m imagining an Amp/Cab only box, similar in footprint to the VP-4 that could integrate with the VP-4 digitally using the S/PDIF, essentially expanding the VP-4 into an eight footswitch Amp Modeler/Effects Processor.
I’d probably be powerless to buy an amp box for desktop
 
Yes. Behind the scenes it's the architecture from the Axe-Fx III. There's still a grid and scenes and channels, etc. It's just that it's mostly hidden from the user and simplified.
Hmmmm…. I’m picturing a secret cheat code that enables the Full Fractal. Will keep watching this space. :stirthepot
 
That's likely because they consider it an unnecessary feature for what Axe-Fx is supposed to do.

You could add a Suhr MicroMIDI to your setup and do this over MIDI...well, if the VP4 would let you configure MIDI CC or PC messages to send on e.g preset or scene changes...
Yeah i have a mesa midi matrix so for me it's easy, but it's also a nice feature so you don't have to buy another $400 box.
 
I'm playing synth through the FM3 right now aaaaaaaaand.... GAS averted, I think? It sounds great but I just prefer Meris reverbs, they put me in my happy place immediately with zero tweaking. Delay is my next priority and the FAS delays are obviously really good, but so are many others. I don't use much modulation honestly, but when I do I prefer FAS to anything else I've tried. I really like FAS for all-in-one guitar solutions with amp sims and really good effects, but maybe I can live without this one.

Not that I was ever the target market for this, but one can always dream of spending money on superfluous things!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top