Foxmeister
Roadie
- Messages
- 937
We'll have to agree to disagree on this point - as far as I'm concerned, a profile/capture of an amp is still a "model" of an amp, very much playing into the idea of being a "black box" model.And it is wrong that he is calling it "Modeler" because it is not a modeler, it is a profile/capture device. That must be misleading a lot of people at the guitar community.
When you take a took across all the platforms, ultimately you have an amp simulation that takes an input signal, processes it, and then outputs a processed signal - how that is actually achieved in practice is irrelevant to the nomenclature, in my opinion.
Currently there is no universally accepted term for what used to just be called profiles, which was fine when Kemper was the only game in town, but now we have profiles, neural captures, tone models, tone captures, and amp clones.
So, I'm perfectly ok with "Neural Amp Modeller" - YMMV of course and that's perfectly fine as it is entirely subjective.