Tube power amp sounds better than solid state power amp for modelers

Jarick said:
Saw a used DT50 at the store yesterday for $400 and was pretty intrigued. Any idea how close they are (or aren't) to the Spider Valve? It had some rebranded Celestion speaker in it, looked pretty decent quality, but weighed an absolute ton.
Click to expand...

By itself? Leagues above the Spider Valve. As a tube power amp about the same from my experience.
 
Baba said:
comedy central season 2 episode 5 GIF by Workaholics
Click to expand...

Yeah I loathe it too. flubby, farty mess it is.
 
BenIfin said:
As always ..... "if it sounds good it is good "

But isn't there an issue (?) in that the Modelers [mostly all of them] model the Tube Power Amp Stage so you would be running a model of a cranked virtual Tube Power Amp Stage -into- a real cranked Tube Power Amp Stage ? ... doubling up so to speak ?

So if doing it with an Axe 3, would it not be "best" / "advisable" to Globally Turn OFF the Power Amp Modelling if running into the EFX Return of a real Tube Power Amp (?)

With Helix this cant be done.

Just some random thoughts.

Ben
Click to expand...

Correct - BUT, it doesn't sound any worse in general - you just have to adjust your EQ. Basically it'll just make the tone a little more scooped if it's a real amp's poweramp (like my fender or mesa FX returns), but dedicated power amps like my VHT/Carvin TS100 have a lot less coloration than that and won't add additional distortion. In fact, I can dial in the VHT to sound pretty close to exactly like my matrix GT1000FX, and I _still_ prefer how it sounds in the room, though you'd only be able to discern that difference playing by yourself probably. The PA50 has more coloration since I understand it's basically the power section of a KSR amp, but it still sounds really good.

The class D stuff may be more technically accurate tonewise, but really what's important is which one makes you smile the most IMO and there's no wrong answer. No one listening is going to know any different either way. I'll use whichever makes the most sense usually, preferring my KSR because it's tube but also tiny and light. I need to try the ISP stealth though (class AB)
 
Last edited:
Jarick said:
Well I don't think anyone's trying to kiss my ass if that's what you're saying.
Click to expand...
Good lord, of course not. WTF would even make you think that was being said? Basically the data and anecdotes here are a small sample space and a small group of people are generalizing a topic/problem with *many* variables... the whole thing is basically many shades of grey but the ensuing discussion makes it seem to be black and white on a cursory reading if you don't consider any other outside information.

It's typical of net discussions like this and is not the fault of the folks here; it's just how things like this go down in this context.
For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong. (H.L. Mencken).
Click to expand...
 
Can anyone here tell me specifically what a tube power amp does for the sound of your modeler/profiler compared to a solid state power amp, when played through a guitar cabinet?

I’ve got a Kemper, which I play through a TC BAM Solid State power amp.

I do NOT like power amp distortion. I get ALL my gain from preamp distortion, because I like my high gain to be super tight.

However, I DO like really warm cleans. My favorite clean tones are from a 59 Bassman.

So my question is this:

Would using a tube power amp make my high gain tones flubby?

I’ve never used a tube power amp, and have only used high gain solid state amps, so I have no idea.
 
Elric said:
Good lord, of course not. WTF would even make you think that was being said? Basically the data and anecdotes here are a small sample space and a small group of people are generalizing a topic/problem with *many* variables... the whole thing is basically many shades of grey but the ensuing discussion makes it seem to be black and white on a cursory reading if you don't consider any other outside information.

It's typical of net discussions like this and is not the fault of the folks here; it's just how things like this go down in this context.
Click to expand...

Well, let us talk about and discuss nothing here then. :whistle

:rofl
 
laxu said:
I'll go against the grain here. I've tried several modelers through a Fryette Power Station 100 (2x 6550 tubes) vs my BluGuitar Amp 1 Mercury Edition (hybrid with subminiature tube for tube response + Class D solid-state poweramp).

The difference between them was minor soundwise with the BluGuitar having a bit of a "character" to it - no surprise since it's meant to emulate a guitar poweramp - but the BluGuitar is more compact and less noisy (no idle noise and no audible fan noise) so for modelers I'd even say it's the better poweramp.
Click to expand...
IIRC that tube poweramp emulation in the Amp1 is similar to the strategy used in the original blue Vox Valvetronix amps. I believe Mahaffay amps also uses that approach for their amps…and I have to say after playing them…there is something there that I find very agreeable to play through. The Amp1 and Mahaffay HiLo Plexi both get unbelievably close to my bigger Marshall style heads in how they compress and bounce through the speaker cab.

I really think a product gap exists for the live traditionalist where we need a solid state class D amp paired with that reactive-whatever technology that can mimic class A, class AB, variable negative feedback, etc, and a way to assign it all via MIDI so my presets can customize the amplification..done deal…shut up and take my money.
 
Bob Zaod said:
When it comes to using my Helix LT through the return of an amp, I have used the following amps generally with a horizontal half open back 2x12 of English V30's.

Mesa DR Tremoverb head
Marshall DSL100H
Marshall DSL40c combo
Line 6 Spidervalve combo or HD100 head
Mesa Mark V 90 combo
Mesa DC-3 head
Jet City JCA100 head
Peavey Bandit Red Stripe combo
Peavey Valveking II 100 head

and a few others that instantly sucked so I didn't spend much time dialing.

I don't have any hard empirical evidence to prove anything but the very best I have experienced so far is the Line 6 Spider Valve HD100.
Not surprised because the tube power section is designed to work well with amp and fx modelling. Seriously it's really not even close what I prefer. The Spider Valve brings out the best in every modeler I have plugged in to it. Sounds and feels the most natural. I have a small collection of Spider Valves because they can be had so cheap on the used market and I want to make sure that if one dies I have backups.
Click to expand...
Great. Now you're making me gas for a local Spider Valve 212 at about 330$ - even though I have "no" use for it... :facepalm
itchyfingers said:
How ironic. Modelers usher in the death of tube amps, but only sound good with tube amps. :wat
Click to expand...
It IS ironic that modelers sound best through a tube power section and real guitar speakers. However it is certainly true IME. Also:
1. Nobody is saying that modelers ONLY sound good with tube amps - just that some/most of us prefer the sound
2. There are A LOT of other reasons to buy a modeler besides replacing a tube amp, such as flexibility in preamp sounds, replacing a large pedalboard, access to large range of guitar effects, built in pedalboard switcher, ease of recording, recording interface, consistency of sounds using presets, flexibility of effects settings thanks to scenes and probably a lot of other use cases that I haven't even thought of...

;)
 
itchyfingers said:
How ironic. Modelers usher in the death of tube amps, but only sound good with tube amps. :wat
Click to expand...

It may just need to be another setting or layer that needs to be tweaked. Or maybe not, could just be my very small sample size.

I would have to assume since Cliff has dozens (or hundreds) of tube amps, he's measured everything and already has modeled the EQ of the tube power amp. But to my ears, I just hear a very pleasing difference and I measured what I heard as well.

I've spent the last couple weeks searching forums looking for information on two things:

First: the high frequency roll-off I observed in the tube amp; is this something others have observed in tube vs solid state power amps, and what's the best way to recreate this in Fractal? The most interesting thing I saw is a parameter called "dynamic presence" which when turned down helped a few people get away from that harshness. But that parameter seems to have been removed at some point.

Second: I'm hearing a warmth in a lot of Kemper profiles that is quite pleasing; have others found this as well compared to Fractal, and what's the best way to recreate this in the Axe FX? For me that would help bridge the gap between these devices.
 
Jarick said:
It may just need to be another setting or layer that needs to be tweaked. Or maybe not, could just be my very small sample size.

I would have to assume since Cliff has dozens (or hundreds) of tube amps, he's measured everything and already has modeled the EQ of the tube power amp. But to my ears, I just hear a very pleasing difference and I measured what I heard as well.
Click to expand...

I think modeling the tube power sections, and actually re-amplifying the signal into real speakers are two totally distinct pieces of the problem. You can have the characteristics of the poweramp/speaker modeled flawlessly, but you've still got to think about how to recreate that in the room. If I model a cranked marshall and play it into a 412 at 90 dB, it's not truly representative of the actual amp volume which would be much louder, and that affects how I perceive the sound a lot. A tube power amp doesn't solve this - but just as in illustration of how the reamplification choices won't necessarily reproduce what you want even though the model is "perfect".

Likewise, I think there are some amplification characteristics (class D vs AB for example) that factor in which extend beyond just the coloration of the power amp. I'm not qualified to say anything about that, but suffice to say that IME I just personally prefer playing through the class AB / tube power amps I have vs the solid state ones I have.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
Cheap light tube amp as modeller power amp?
2 3
Replies
53
Views
2K
Sedaxel
S
0XI0
solid state power amp breakup (Boss Katana gen 3)
Replies
8
Views
1K
Baba
Baba
Badonkey Kong
Interesting - Power Amp only IRs
Replies
6
Views
489
Alex Kenivel
Alex Kenivel
Eagle
Best solid state rack power amp ?
3 4 5
Replies
84
Views
2K
likitlikeyoulikeit
likitlikeyoulikeit
Iron1
Modeler/Tube amp question
Replies
5
Views
365
ragingplatypi
ragingplatypi
Back
Top