JiveTurkey
Goatlord
- Messages
- 18,626
Would you want me to say everything is great and excellent value?? I doubt it. I would have to change my name to Dave!![]()


Would you want me to say everything is great and excellent value?? I doubt it. I would have to change my name to Dave!![]()
You have the goldest of gold ears.The Timefactor sounds so much better. This was my problem with the H9 before. I replaced a Timefactor with one and regretted it instantly. The H90 is just more of this . H9/90 reverb is so bad it isn’t even funny.
You have the goldest of gold ears.
I play on tracks I compose professionally (though there are plenty of occasions when I hire a better player). I know a lot of players who use, and like, the H9 and H90.Everyone likes what they like but you’re not in the minority in knowing the H9 and H90 doesn’t sound like shit. I’m no pro but I have a good friend who’s played on quite a few albums and he still does session work out Nashville and remotely as well. He has an H90 on his board and he uses it quite a bit and never gets told his sound sounds like “glossy digital shit”. It may not be your thing and you can certainly prefer other units who do the same effects but to say it sounds like shit? Laughable.
This isn't to argue the point; there's no mileage in arguing about taste. No one 'wins'.I spent many years with Lexicon PCM TC2290 and a H3000se . These days I tend to use axe 3 fx only.
You get used to them and the way they blend together. The H90 just sits on top and has a tone in everything that imo is pretty fake sounding. The reverb in particular. I was perfectly happy with the Timefactor but made the mistake of assuming the H9 would sound the same.
I was never a fan of the M5000 but it explains why you like the H90 . I don’t mean that in a bad way just the overall tone of the unit is far more similar.This isn't to argue the point; there's no mileage in arguing about taste. No one 'wins'.
Coincidentally, besides the Eventide we both used, my other main reverb and delay unit in the '90s and '00s was a TC M5000, their top-of-line box; I thought it sounded great - different from the H3000 d/se, more crystalline. I had several Lexicon units, too, but mostly relegated them to synths and samplers, which at the time usually didn't come with effects.
Every instrument, monitor, amp, effect, mixing console, mic, mic preamp, tube, tape type, cable and (importantly) room has a sound, and one picks and chooses whatever works for a given project.
I composed music for my first TV ad in 1989, and went into the business full time in 1991 (previously I had practiced law, of all things). I've been extremely lucky, and have done an awful lot of music composition and production ever since.
The most important thing I learned about gear in that time is:
"Best" is what works for the project, nothing more. Choices in music production are entirely subjective. Use what works and enjoy the process.
That is an important lesson."Best" is what works for the project, nothing more. Choices in music production are entirely subjective. Use what works and enjoy the process.
"Best" is what works for the project, nothing more. Choices in music production are entirely subjective. Use what works and enjoy the process.
Couldn't agree more! It's all about being at your best and most creative, whether that's a live show or recording.If you’re using stuff you don’t like your not going to be at your best.
I suffer from the very same sickness!Less time worrying about "perfect" gear and more time about the composition and what it needs. Doesn't mean we can't still crave for that unique piece and what secrets it will magically unlock though. We're all sick in the head.![]()
Well said. I think what people tend to roll their eyes at is the hyperbolic generalities without any meaningful attempt to quantify why they don’t like something when talking about what gear we prefer to use. You sir don’t have that issue.
Ditto!To make up for it, I have other issues - ask my wife!![]()
Some people have the ability to make 'crap' or less-than-perfect gear sound amazing though. Some even thrive on that experience, especially in recording. The listener in most cases would have no idea what was being used unless they saw it.Stuff is only subjective to a point. There’s plenty of gear that is just so much better it’s beyond preference. But there is also often stuff that is basically crap but works for one thing in a certain way that makes it right for the job. That doesn’t stop it being crap but it does stop it being useless. The Rockman springs to mind.
That’s just another way of saying the same thing.Some people have the ability to make 'crap' or less-than-perfect gear sound amazing though. Some even thrive on that experience, especially in recording. The listener in most cases would have no idea what was being used unless they saw it.
Yep, I reread your post again. My mind left out a few words the first time.That’s just another way of saying the same thing.
I only have one, it ain’t so bad. Fellas, if you have a painful lump, get it checkedI’d amputate a testicle to get something similar in the Fractalverse.