- Messages
- 7,171
The very first rear-wheel drive.
I wouldn't call investing in a nice tube amp or pedals a trap. It's definitely a choice, a road to travel that many enjoy.
The trap would be more like thinking a tube amp will make you a better player or that it should fill a void your playing can't fill.
The trap would be more like thinking a tube amp will make you a better player or that it should fill a void your playing can't fill.
I think he meant the trap is that you keep buying different amps and pedals.
What does "forgiving" even mean? Correcting clams? Fixing bad time or intonation?The digital version of an amp is always more forgiving ime.
Ever owned a Bad cat? Or a Matchless. Or the feel difference between a typical Marshall and Friedman. If you haven’t experienced it you won’t know what I’m referring too.What does "forgiving" even mean? Correcting clams? Fixing bad time or intonation?
I think tube amps can be a bit more "peaky" (dynamic) until you get them to a certain volume.What does "forgiving" even mean? Correcting clams? Fixing bad time or intonation?
The digital version of an amp is always more forgiving ime. You may or may not like that but neither is likely to make you a better player. Practicing dry may though.
This .I think tube amps can be a bit more "peaky" (dynamic) until you get them to a certain volume.
I notice this when using clean presets on a modeler through a FR cab. The tone is way more contained and leveled off somewhat, whereas a clean tube amp in the room at similar volume is much more dynamic and touchy for better or worse. It's dying to be turned up. I think when using distortion the line between the two becomes relative because the range is narrowed and compressed. Just ime.
Yeah, and I'm not dissing modeler into FR, it's actually more comfortable to my ears in the room because it's less peaky. I can even turn the relative volume up higher because it's balanced.This .
It’s the main reason that digital can’t do amp in the room and may never be able to unless fr fr gets a lot better in this area.
But, I will say that turning off the speaker IR and just running into the FR directly gives a bit more range, and I like that too. The FR10 sounds good like that.Yeah, and I'm not dissing modeler into FR, it's actually more comfortable to my ears in the room because it's less peaky. I can even turn the relative volume up higher because it's balanced.
Why can’t you trust your ears?
To me these are the key drivers for getting stuck in knob twisting.We are complex, we are different. I don’t doubt digital, I doubt myself.
If you can't provide a good description of the term "forgiving" beyond simply dropping brand names, I've got to wonder if you really "know what I’m referring too (sic)."Ever owned a Bad cat? Or a Matchless. Or the feel difference between a typical Marshall and Friedman. If you haven’t experienced it you won’t know what I’m referring too.
”I can’t figure out why this IR captured with a mic a couple inches from a speaker doesn’t lead to the same sound as the speaker played in an open room. I just need a better "FRFR"”.This .
It’s the main reason that digital can’t do amp in the room and may never be able to unless fr fr gets a lot better in this area.
To my ears, that's a bug, not a feature. If I'm looking for uncompressed ("peaky"), I want it to be there at any volume I need to play. Ditto more compressed ('smoother"). Tube amps have issues with both of those.I think tube amps can be a bit more "peaky" (dynamic) until you get them to a certain volume.
That's not at all a necessary result of using a modeler.I notice this when using clean presets on a modeler through a FR cab.
Then your modeler is dialed to match the sound of a louder amp, but you're playing it at a lower volume. If you really want your modeler to sound like the tube amp at low volume, try decreasing master volume and sag and increasing "damping" (i.e., negative feedback) in the modeler's amp block.The tone is way more contained and leveled off somewhat,
If you really want that but can't make your modeler do exactly the same thing, then there's a deficiency in your modeler, the preset you're using, and/or your monitoring solution.whereas a clean tube amp in the room at similar volume is much more dynamic and touchy for better or worse.
Broad generalizations are always false. If somebody tells me that I can't make "a digital version of an amp or pedal" sound the same, they are speaking from abject ignorance, of which they are probably completely unaware.But if someone tells you a digital version of an amp or pedal is exactly the same they are just lying, probably to themselves too.
Digital amps are more compressed feeling even when they don’t sound that way . Far more generic feel across similar but subtly different amp models, less touch sensitive. They sound smaller in the room and you can feel the latency in some platforms sufficiently to feel detached .If you can't provide a good description of the term "forgiving" beyond simply dropping brand names, I've got to wonder if you really "know what I’m referring too (sic)."
A little context: I've owned a pretty wide variety of tube amps over the past 56 years, including multiple Marshalls and Fenders. I've played even more - e.g., Hiwatt, Acoustic, Ampeg, Sunn, Music Man, Mesa - for long enough periods of time to become familiar with their sound and feel. I'm knowledgeable enough about tube amp design to have developed modifications targeted at altering the sound and feel, and I've on occasion performed those mods on customer amps.
Having said that, I'll add that I haven't the slightest interest in owning a Bad Cat or Matchless. OTOH, I do have intimate experience with the difference between a stock Marshall and the same amp with additional gain stages and tone shaping from mods I developed and performed.
I'll repeat my request that you elaborate on precisely what you mean by "forgiving."