Suhr Reactive Load Vs Fractal Audio X-Load

How suspectible to abuse/mishandling are these things really? Anything to keep an extra eye on when buying used?
Difficult to give an answer that will cover every case but, generally, they'll either work or they won't. The parts that will probably wear out first are the capacitor(s) and the fan (if there is one). Fan is easy to check, caps failing will probably smell pretty bad and cause the impedance to go funny (no resonant peak, and a severe rise from low mids upward). Catastrophic failure would be through overheating, and I'd expect there to be a lovely fragrance of burnt resistor present outside the box and clear visual signs of toastiness inside.

Did that help? I tried writing before coffee again...
 
Here's how my Suhr Reactive load measured:

Suhr Reactive Load.png
 
I'd be very interested to see the curve of the v-type in a 212 - would you share the result?

I don't think there is a load on the market that matches either of those cabs, though maybe the REact:IR-box can get you there with some digital magic?

Here's how it measured
PRS Archon 2x12 Stealth.png


Attached is also the mdat file from REW (remove the .pdf extension, I only had to do that to attach it here)


And how it compares to the Suhr RL
Suhr Reactive Load vs PRS 2x12 Archon Stealth.png
 

Attachments

Weird. IIRC those 2 resonance peaks in the low end happen when you're dealing with ported cabs or improper sealed enclosures.
In a ported cab you would generally, depending on design, get two quite distinct peaks where the lower one is usually the most severe. Here's a pretty obvious one:
BF_112.jpg
 
The spike at 150 hz definitely is interesting. Well above what I would expect to see from a closed cab with V types.
It's at 140, which doesn't seem unreasonable but I'm not familiar with this speaker and, sadly, have very few 212 cabs in my library of impedance curves to compare it to.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top