Neural DSP Nano Cortex

Adding a 3rd party IR... you don't get the mic and placement options (obviously). You can see the more simplified layout below vs the factory IR in my post above.

Trying one of my favorite IR packs (the Marshall Silver 87 from Seacow Cabs...), and it sounds killer!

IMG_4480.jpeg
 
Last edited:
Found a decent IIC+ capture for my utter love of Master of Puppets.

View attachment 31104

Playing with the built-in NDSP IRs… there’s actually more to them than simple IRs. Actually have options on mic type, mic distance and some basic EQ’ing. I’m hoping they allow for dual IRs in the future.

View attachment 31105
Dual Ir would be pretty cool although w on board cabs
5 mics w 6 positions you basically have about 30 Irs
Which is more than decent IMO
But mixes would be cool
 
  • Like
Reactions: LCW
Dual Ir would be pretty cool although w on board cabs
5 mics w 6 positions you basically have about 30 Irs
Which is more than decent IMO
But mixes would be cool
Yeah I was surprised that the factory built-in IRs are this tweakable. More like QC cab blocks than IRs.
 
Guaranteed, NDSP will open up the effects slots in an up-coming firmware update. I hope it happens sooner than later.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LCW
Regarding the markings on the knobs - from the manual:
"By default, the Nano Cortex knobs adjust parameters immediately when turned. If the 'Catching Knobs Instantly' setting is disabled on the Cortex Cloud app, Nano Cortex will operate in Latching Mode, where the knobs' position must match the values indicated by the LED rings before they start adjusting parameters."
I have zero problem with the non-360° rotation but the reason could be because of the latching and non-latching modes. I think endless encoders would cause problems in this regard.
Anyway, no buyers remorse here, but I still want onboard or MIDI control of effect parameters and a desktop app connected via USB to make it much easier to organize patches.
 
Regarding the markings on the knobs - from the manual:
"By default, the Nano Cortex knobs adjust parameters immediately when turned. If the 'Catching Knobs Instantly' setting is disabled on the Cortex Cloud app, Nano Cortex will operate in Latching Mode, where the knobs' position must match the values indicated by the LED rings before they start adjusting parameters."
I have zero problem with the non-360° rotation but the reason could be because of the latching and non-latching modes. I think endless encoders would cause problems in this regard.
It's the other way around. The latching mode exists cus they didn't use endless encoders, as a fix to the annoyance of values jumping.
 
Regarding the markings on the knobs - from the manual:
"By default, the Nano Cortex knobs adjust parameters immediately when turned. If the 'Catching Knobs Instantly' setting is disabled on the Cortex Cloud app, Nano Cortex will operate in Latching Mode, where the knobs' position must match the values indicated by the LED rings before they start adjusting parameters."
I have zero problem with the non-360° rotation but the reason could be because of the latching and non-latching modes. I think endless encoders would cause problems in this regard.
Anyway, no buyers remorse here, but I still want onboard or MIDI control of effect parameters and a desktop app connected via USB to make it much easier to organize patches.
These modes are there because they didn't use endless encoders, not the other way around. This is very common in synths, where it actually makes sense for some controls, like filter cutoff, where you want to be able to feel the end of range. They don't make much sense in a guitar pedal IMO
 
These modes are there because they didn't use endless encoders, not the other way around. This is very common in synths, where it actually makes sense for some controls, like filter cutoff, where you want to be able to feel the end of range. They don't make much sense in a guitar pedal IMO
Respectfully, I'm afraid I don't understand that reasoning at all. Even with endless encoders, you would still have latching and unlatching. And as far as guitar pedals go, I have dozens that do not have endless encoders and I like them that way. I own the Nano and honestly, it is not a problem.
 
I'm going to be honest, that "update" contains very little if any substance. I don't see anything about a guarantee to add any blocks or free up the fixed chain.
Yeah, it is vague. It *is* a public commitment to improving it and treating it as a 'platform', though.

I get it why it feels unsatisfying to anyone who has followed along with the NDSP hardware saga. And that's why it gets a 'FWIW' from me. Neural has made their own bed with the folks here: They're damned if they do, damned if they don't.

If they make specific promises people will hold them over their heads and scorekeep until the entire check list is done and keep track of misses or changes as if they're owed something. If they put up vague stuff people will claim they are a shifty marketing first developer and never gonna do X,Y,Z where X, Y, Z is the complainer's personal feature requests.

I think with the NC they have realized the latter is probably a better strategy. They also probably have realized that the complainers are not going to crush sales, either.
 
Respectfully, I'm afraid I don't understand that reasoning at all. Even with endless encoders, you would still have latching and unlatching. And as far as guitar pedals go, I have dozens that do not have endless encoders and I like them that way. I own the Nano and honestly, it is not a problem.
I meant when the controls are implemented like this is when they don't make sense. You have an led ring that shows what the knob is set at. Then when you turn an endless encoder, you're immediately picking up from where it's set. There is no need for the physical knob to match the value so you wouldn't need any modes, you just turn the knob.
 
...when you turn an endless encoder, you're immediately picking up from where it's set. There is no need for the physical knob to match the value so you wouldn't need any modes, you just turn the knob.
Not all endless encoders work this way. Some do latch. That sounds more like motorized encoders though I'm sure there are encoders that work exactly as you're describing. Regardless, it boils down to personal preference. I like it the way it is and I like having the markings on the knobs because I can go to the next patch and I can compare the LEDs with the mark and immediately tell how the EQ or levels changed for that patch. And I don't have to worry about any levels jumping because I have to return to the previous value and increment or decrement from there - that is unless I have the latching mode turned off by way of the app. Other interface decisions on the Nano are definitely quirky but... I'm old school and nothing is built with my aesthetic in mind anymore so, c'est la vie.
 
Not all endless encoders work this way. Some do latch. That sounds more like motorized encoders though I'm sure there are encoders that work exactly as you're describing. Regardless, it boils down to personal preference. I like it the way it is and I like having the markings on the knobs because I can go to the next patch and I can compare the LEDs with the mark and immediately tell how the EQ or levels changed for that patch. And I don't have to worry about any levels jumping because I have to return to the previous value and increment or decrement from there - that is unless I have the latching mode turned off by way of the app. Other interface decisions on the Nano are definitely quirky but... I'm old school and nothing is built with my aesthetic in mind anymore so, c'est la vie.
Uhhh, could you point me to endless encoders that you have to turn to match a value before it will change the value? The knobs don't have a position, they just turn and turn and turn endlessly.
 
Just finished my first gig with it. Stage monitoring with a Celestion speaker, and captures of my amp.

It was just perfect. Just the feeling I'm used to when playing through my amp. Absolutely comfortable, well placed in the mix, no noises, and easy to tweak with the smartphone (needed to give a couple dBs to one capture to level volumes... It took nothing).

I'm really happy.

IMG_20241018_165537.jpg
 
Just finished my first gig with it. Stage monitoring with a Celestion speaker, and captures of my amp.

It was just perfect. Just the feeling I'm used to when playing through my amp. Absolutely comfortable, well placed in the mix, no noises, and easy to tweak with the smartphone (needed to give a couple dBs to one capture to level volumes... It took nothing).

I'm really happy.

View attachment 31269
can't ask for more than that , honestly if it is compact sounds and feels like what you are used to with your amps , I would say that's a win
 
Sure.

Very practical rig. I have three captures, clean, lead, and ts9+clean. Then I add effects with the ms-3.

This makes it extremely flexible too, thanks ms-3 capabilities.

Today, I really enjoyed the gig. And my back is happy too.
not sure what tones you dig , but look up Drew Lankford Fast red Pony

to my ears his captures of his Spawn and Jubilee are killer

 
Back
Top