namathan_zirwir
Groupie
- Messages
- 60
mine doesn't do that. LOL, Uh, he has his phone on top of the headphones.
NDSP Quad Cortex
- Thread starter Jarick
- Start date
mine doesn't do that. LOL, Uh, he has his phone on top of the headphones.
deadpool_25
Roadie
- Messages
- 410
My impression was he was using the phone to record the noise he was hearing while using his headphones. Presumably without his phone sitting on his head or on the QC
namathan_zirwir
Groupie
- Messages
- 60
oh maybe. mine doesnt do that, so dunno what is going on.My impression was he was using the phone to record the noise he was hearing while using his headphones. Presumably without his phone sitting on his head or on the QC
Lysander
Shredder
- Messages
- 2,068
It's a well known issue, as far as i know - people were complaning about ground loops right after the QC first launched.
I never experienced it on mine, but i had a USB cable connected to the device at all times (yes, i was expecting the editor to launch soon...)
Achilles
Rock Star
- Messages
- 4,555
Of course. We all got valid POV's.
For the record mine's based on having way too much time on my hands to read the internet.
- Messages
- 5,160
He clearly says in the video that he's using his phone to record the sound coming from the headphones.
namathan_zirwir
Groupie
- Messages
- 60
And you clearly have a hate on for trying to sabotage this thing. What is your deal really? Serious question.
What are you trying to prove in this thread?
- Messages
- 5,160
This is not a valid POV.
- Messages
- 5,160
OK. Let me just illustrate something here..... in short succession I made two posts:
NDSP Quad Cortex
It's mostly just a portion of the FAS user base that feels threatened by NDSP I mean, that has nothing to do with me so why are you even bringing it up? This all got started when I was contemplating buying a unit, and then remembered all of the annoying shit I had to deal with the first time...
thegearforum.com
"This is really cool"
And this one:
NDSP Quad Cortex
It's mostly just a portion of the FAS user base that feels threatened by NDSP I mean, that has nothing to do with me so why are you even bringing it up? This all got started when I was contemplating buying a unit, and then remembered all of the annoying shit I had to deal with the first time...
thegearforum.com
"This is bad"
... and you chose to focus on the second one, and completely ignore the first one. So who has the issue here really?? What is your deal really?? Why are you so quick to judge people who aren't 100% happy with this thing?? Why are you acting like a fanboi who can't handle different opinions??
I've clearly said multiple times I was thinking of buying another one. I've also clearly said that I have owned one before, and I posted proof too. I've also clearly laid out the issues I had the first time round, and how the reports of hardware problems, crashes, freezes and the like, give me a lot of reservations about buying another one.
So "literally have nothing good to say about it" is just not the reality at all. If you go back through my posting here on the QC, I've said a lot of good things about it in the past, and doubtless I will again in the future. I've also talked about the bad things, and I've also made acerbic jokes at Neural's expense. But none of this changes the fact that I'm currently considering a purchase, and I'm doing my research. Hence posting that noise video.
namathan_zirwir
Groupie
- Messages
- 60
few thingsOK. Let me just illustrate something here..... in short succession I made two posts:
NDSP Quad Cortex
It's mostly just a portion of the FAS user base that feels threatened by NDSP I mean, that has nothing to do with me so why are you even bringing it up? This all got started when I was contemplating buying a unit, and then remembered all of the annoying shit I had to deal with the first time...
"This is really cool"
And this one:
NDSP Quad Cortex
It's mostly just a portion of the FAS user base that feels threatened by NDSP I mean, that has nothing to do with me so why are you even bringing it up? This all got started when I was contemplating buying a unit, and then remembered all of the annoying shit I had to deal with the first time...
"This is bad"
... and you chose to focus on the second one, and completely ignore the first one. So who has the issue here really?? What is your deal really?? Why are you so quick to judge people who aren't 100% happy with this thing?? Why are you acting like a fanboi who can't handle different opinions??
I've clearly said multiple times I was thinking of buying another one. I've also clearly said that I have owned one before, and I posted proof too. I've also clearly laid out the issues I had the first time round, and how the reports of hardware problems, crashes, freezes and the like, give me a lot of reservations about buying another one.
So "literally have nothing good to say about it" is just not the reality at all. If you go back through my posting here on the QC, I've said a lot of good things about it in the past, and doubtless I will again in the future. I've also talked about the bad things, and I've also made acerbic jokes at Neural's expense. But none of this changes the fact that I'm currently considering a purchase, and I'm doing my research. Hence posting that noise video.
- not a fanboi. not at all. I enjoy the QC. Simple. That's it.
- no issues, no judgement. You seem to be VERY negative. about the QC. Calling it as I see it here - in this thread. Didn't intend to hurt your feelings.
- for something that I don't like, I just wouldn't spend a ton of time in a thread, slagging it. It's just weird.
- yeah, not scrolling back through your posts. I'm good.
Cheers
Los-D
Shredder
- Messages
- 1,244
I’ve had 2 separate ones in the past 2+ years and yes, I saw this issue in both cases.
deepskyone
Groupie
- Messages
- 63
@Orvillain owned a QC before.
He had problems with the unit.
He is considering to get another one.
He wants to know if those problems are resolved.
Thus, he is posting in this thread where the QC owners hang around to get this information.
How is one supposed to do that without raising those issues and being "negative"?
And it is good info for other prospective owners, e.g. yours truly.
namathan_zirwir
Groupie
- Messages
- 60
Fair enough. Just tried of so much negativity lately.
@Orvillain owned a QC before.
He had problems with the unit.
He is considering to get another one.
He wants to know if those problems are resolved.
Thus, he is posting in this thread where the QC owners hang around to get this information.
How is one supposed to do that without raising those issues and being "negative"?
And it is good info for other prospective owners, e.g. yours truly.
@Orvillain - it appears I was out of line and I apologize.
- Messages
- 5,160
No apologies. We must fight to the death. The winner will feast upon the losers entrails. There will be no mercy. The McLeods will not survive the 14th century.
- Messages
- 4,711
The Looper is awesome. There is one bug that's been there since day 1 of the Looper that drives me crazy, though. If you're in the Looper view the footswitches override Scenes/ Stomps/ Hybrid/ whatever and map to the Looper controls (Record, Play, etc...) as expected. But if, from there, you click the "Params" button to bring up the Looper settings (a very useful place to hang out, since you've got playback level, MIDI Clock settings, etc. right there), the footswitches stop firing as Looper events, and cascade up to fire as Scenes/ Stomps/ Hybrid events instead. This is true with both the onboard switches and with external MIDI controllers mapped to fire those same switches. It's fucking maddening, and it really ought to be an easy fix.
- Messages
- 5,160
That sucks. How long has it been like that??
- Messages
- 5,160
I hadn't realised that they'd changed the scene mode parameter assignment stuff.
At least I'm pretty sure that at launch all parameters were tied to scenes. So if you wanted to use scenes, you'd have to update a parameter in all 8 scenes if you wanted to change its 'global' value (IE: all scenes have the same value)
But now if you press and hold on a parameter it will assign it to scenes... ie: if it isn't part of the scenes assignment, then you can just set the parameter on a single scene and it will always apply.
That was one of those workflow things that I remember really annoying me. Glad they've fixed it.
At least I'm pretty sure that at launch all parameters were tied to scenes. So if you wanted to use scenes, you'd have to update a parameter in all 8 scenes if you wanted to change its 'global' value (IE: all scenes have the same value)
But now if you press and hold on a parameter it will assign it to scenes... ie: if it isn't part of the scenes assignment, then you can just set the parameter on a single scene and it will always apply.
That was one of those workflow things that I remember really annoying me. Glad they've fixed it.
- Messages
- 5,160
Hmm, the punch in option for the loop is quite cool. The duplicate functionality is pretty sick too.
Does anyone know if you can re-arrange the assignments of the various looper functions to the footswitches? IE: Could you put the punch in along the front row? Can you trigger the looper from midi CC's ??
Does anyone know if you can re-arrange the assignments of the various looper functions to the footswitches? IE: Could you put the punch in along the front row? Can you trigger the looper from midi CC's ??
Similar threads
