Line 6 Helix Stadium Talk

[mikah912]

I'm not going to bother to post my compare of that amp. I'm hearing it here as spot on between platforms with the same exact settings. But my hearing is obviously compromised.

It may be dead on. It may not.

I do like the HX version better of both the blue and red channels, however.

 

[Deadpan]

I'm not going to bother to post my compare of that amp. I'm hearing it here as spot on between platforms with the same exact settings. But my hearing is obviously compromised.

Where do you have the master set?

 

[Karl Houseknecht]

Where do you have the master set?

3.5 on both

 

[sashimi]

That won't help if the cause is that their anti-aliasing filters are cutting too many high frequencies in their new Agoura circuit topologies - for example.

Problem is.... you change that, and you literally change everyone's presets, and everyone will complain because they're used to the way it sounds. Cliff experiences this all the time too. He improves something, and people get annoyed because their sounds changed.

This should've been caught by an alpha tester IMHO. But the problem you have is, lots of modelling people haven't used real amplifiers for decades at this point. They've forgotten what they're supposed to sound like.

Aren’t you jumping to conclusions though, assuming this is an anti aliasing filtering or modeling accuracy problem and not just two different amps being modeled? The difference between the two clips is so minute that it could easily just be the difference between two examples of the exact same amp, due to component value inconsistencies, right? Or even just slightly different tone settings or variations in pot values? Why assume that this is a problem with the way Line 6 is modeling the amps? Don’t you think they already did tons of listening tests to make sure the model perfectly matches the source amp?

To sit there with no way to reference the source amp and say that they did something wrong just doesn’t add up to me. Everyone knows even two examples of the exact same guitar/amp/microphone etc can and will sound slightly different, which is why I kind of roll my eyes at the whole modeling accuracy obsession at this point.

 

[Deadpan]

3.5 on both

I need to try a higher setting.

 

[GLiDE-BPM]

Love my Stadium so far, and am looking forward to the other promised features like Proxy.
However, I have been enjoying the living heck out of V2 captures on my used QC!!!
I've got an 8 scene kitchen sink preset with 8 V2 captures for the 8 scenes and all my
usual 4 Rung Super Serial effects blocks, etc.

Still getting some time on my priceless Axe FX/FM9 presets. I haven't built a preset from scratch on Fractal toys in quite
awhile! Love my current presets too much on them!

 

[GLiDE-BPM]

I’m wondering if I should just get the XL. It’s not that big, and the expression pedal is a lot nicer than I thought it was going to be. A big improvement over the Floor/LT.

It is definitely not that big at all! You should see my giant FM9 pedalboard... LoL!!!

 

[paisleywookiee]

It is definitely not that big at all! You should see my giant FM9 pedalboard... LoL!!!

I'm not doing anything until I think about it a bit. I'm just going to give it until the Stadium comes out, and deciding then.

 

[Dimiguitar]

To sit there with no way to reference the source amp and say that they did something wrong just doesn’t add up to me.

We don't have a way to reference amp sims if, for example, that means having the same exact amp, in the exact same condition.

But the general case made here (correct me if wrong) seems to be there's a trend among several high gain stadium amp sims where some high end is missing.

I think that's a stronger claim.

It's a bit like having a cut for frequencies below 100hz. Do we need to have the exact amps a company based their modelling on, to know this doesn't tend to happen in the analog world?

Especially not as a trend, when this difference seems to appear in multiple sims. What are the chances these amps a company owns all (or many) exhibit similar such differences compared to what people typically expect from the real amps?

So I am not sure amp variation explains the differences people see here. It would be surprising to me. But who knows -- it's hard to be certain.

 

[Karl Houseknecht]

there's a trend among several high gain stadium amp sims where some high end is missing.

Is that a trend that comes from people who have actually played the unit or just people listening to clips online? Because I’d argue that the Agoura amps are brighter than their HX counterparts.

 

[HotRats]

If several people can all hear it on soundcloud in a single pass then it’s clear enough? Several people mentioned the top end as the main difference - either a difference can be heard or it can’t.

As I said already, I think whether it matters or not is open to debate, and a subjective matter for each individual. However, there is no debate that Agoura sounds less bright in your examples, or any of the others that have been posted.

As I've clearly stated before, those who believe that Agoura modelling is darker by nature might be right, there Agoura demos on you tube that seems to show that.

But Karl's clips can't tell us nothing about it.

One of the clip is slightly brighter or the other is slightly darker, depending on how you want so see it.

(and there's also a difference in the low end)

Without a reference point, aka the amps being modeled, we can't draw any conclusion based on those clips.

To use those clips as a data point for the argument of Agoura being darker, we have assume that fractal model is more accurate and that's a strong assumption.

Is it a legit assumption?
It might be, given the history of fractal modelling, but an assumption nonetheless.

Dying on Karl's clips hill seems a bit a classic case of confirmation bias, If I may.

I understand and relate to your passion for sounds and all but man, you should just relax and wait. Time will tell the whole story.