Line 6 Helix Stadium Pre-Launch Discussion

If everyone's over the moon on the Stadium I may considering moving the Axe 3 for one next year sometime.
FWIW I can’t imagine Stadium being a fractal killer…certainly not right out of the gate, if ever. It likely depends on your needs though. If you want to try different tubes or bright caps, fractal is probably still the king of that castle.
 
FWIW I can’t imagine Stadium being a fractal killer…certainly not right out of the gate, if ever. It likely depends on your needs though. If you want to try different tubes or bright caps, fractal is probably still the king of that castle.
Is that something people really consider when buying a modeler? I mean, it sounds fun or curious, but I hardly find it more important than audio quality or UX.
 
Is that something people really consider when buying a modeler? I mean, it sounds fun or curious, but I hardly find it more important than audio quality or UX.
For the types of users I specifically called out in my post, yes.
 
Last edited:
Is that something people really consider when buying a modeler? I mean, it sounds fun or curious, but I hardly find it more important than audio quality or UX.
200.gif
 
FWIW I can’t imagine Stadium being a fractal killer…certainly not right out of the gate, if ever. It likely depends on your needs though. If you want to try different tubes or bright caps, fractal is probably still the king of that castle.
I disagree with this. From an effect standpoint I think Fractal holds it's own. From an amp perspective, I think Tonex and NAM are better, and many are on par (in fact Helix has some great amp models already) . From a UI perspective, almost everything beats Fractal and I do own an AXE3. Like @Jarick , if Stadium can reach Tonex/NAM levels, and improve some of its effects, my AXE3 will be departing. There's a lot to be said for a great UI and a company that you really want to support.
 
Last edited:
Hoping to see a change from “processing” to “shipped”.
Mine was one of the GC oopses. It's been statused as shipped since 11/1. I hope Line 6 putting the brakes on things didn't cause it to get lost. GC took my money, FedEx is saying they never received it. I'll keep checking it as the week goes on.
 
I disagree with this. From an effect standpoint I think Fractal holds its own. From an amp perspective, I think Tonex and NAM are better, and many are on par. From a UI perspective, almost everything beats Fractal and I do own an AXE3. Like @Jarick , if Stadium can reach Tonex/NAM levels, my AXE3 will be departing.
We can debate Tonex and NAM and its merits vs white box modeling, but that doesn’t change the fact that Stadium won’t have capture tech at launch. I qualified my original statement that way for a reason.
 
Hi, guys. Sorry if my question is dumb and already discussed... i've looked for an answer but i'm still uncertain. In the new Stadium the old amps will be in a subcategory "legacy amps". Ok, fine. What about the effects? I've read something about some missing eq, replaced by the new one) so i'm warried about the legacy effects from old M13. Will be still in the new hardware? I've some of them in my presets and not shure if i will loose them or not.

Tx for your attention!
Legacy effects from XX4 and MXX are still in Helix Stadium.

Also note that HX amps aren't all going into a Legacy subcategory. Amps only get moved when an Agoura version supplants them. So given that we started re-modeling our newest and best HX amps in Agoura, amps in the Legacy subcategory on average sound better than the non-Legacy HX amps. Weird now, but it'll make sense later.
 
FWIW I can’t imagine Stadium being a fractal killer…certainly not right out of the gate, if ever. It likely depends on your needs though. If you want to try different tubes or bright caps, fractal is probably still the king of that castle.
Here's the thing. We don't expect—nor would we want—Helix Stadium to be a Fractal killer. We want Fractal to do well because they're a good company who designs and develops on their own terms. They're good for the digital market.
 
Last edited:
We can debate Tonex and NAM and its merits vs white box modeling, but that doesn’t change the fact that Stadium won’t have capture tech at launch. I qualified my original statement that way for a reason.
I don't separate modeling vs profiling/capturing. If a modeler or capture specifies an amp model and it sounds and feels true to form then its fine to me.
 
Mine was one of the GC oopses. It's been statused as shipped since 11/1. I hope Line 6 putting the brakes on things didn't cause it to get lost. GC took my money, FedEx is saying they never received it. I'll keep checking it as the week goes on.
Mine is the same, but is MF/UPS. While having the status stuck like that does make me a little nervous, I wouldn't worry about it yet. I'm sure all the ones from the early mistake shipping batch are like that.
 
Here's the thing. We don't expect—nor would we want—Helix Stadium to be a Fractal killer. We want Fractal to do well because they're a good company who designs and develops on their own terms. They're good for the digital market.

Exactly, I don't care if Line 6 can out Fractal the Fractal, I'm more interested if it's a big step forward in terms of tone and UI. As the Fender TMP has essentially replaced the Fractal for every day use for me, the Fractal is more expendable. Realistically though I'd want to see what Fractal offers down the road as a replacement for the FM9 but I think that may be a long ways off.
 
Same. It’s just a big flex.
It's not. There would be no amp modeling if there weren't, you know; amps in the real world to model.

I don't tube roll in FAS but I do tweak bright caps as I see fit as well as use the baked in amp block boosts. The whole "I played amps and they suck" crew that you find out once played a 50 watt Mustang or Catalyst one time for 5 seconds at a rando GC can certainly comment regarding accuracy or how end users don't need anything but Fisher Price world but I don't think there's any weight to their opinions.
 
Well the DSP talk got me curious,

Here's some interesting tidbits
I believe Helix Floor uses two ADSP-21469 SHARCs at 450MHz and the FM9 Turbo uses two ADSP‑SC587 at 500Mhz.

Also the Helix Stadium copy says
When it comes to processing power, the Helix Stadium XL and the Helix Stadium are essentially identical. Both models boast enhanced DSP power, a dedicated GPU, a machine-learning accelerator, and FPGAs, all topped off with fresh 64-bit floating-point architecture.

So taking those tidbits, I'm gonna play "guess which processors does the Helix Stadium use?" (we shall know soon enough).

A quick search at AD and NXP sites, maybe these?
  • Two ADSP-21593's for DSP maybe at 800Mhz
  • NXP i.MX 8M plus for the Application SoC
    • My search was mainly "which NXP SoC has an NPU (ML accelerator) + GPU"
 
It's not. There would be no amp modeling if there weren't, you know; amps in the real world to model.

I don't tube roll in FAS but I do tweak bright caps as I see fit as well as use the baked in amp block boosts. The whole "I played amps and they suck" crew that you find out once played a 50 watt Mustang or Catalyst one time for 5 seconds at a rando GC can certainly comment regarding accuracy or how end users don't need anything but Fisher Price world but I don't think there's any weight to their opinions.
I’ve rolled tubes in every amp I’ve owned. I’ve also changed bright cap values and in several cases installed switches to allow alternate bright cap values. My 1959 and 2204 both have several bright cap values available.

Ultimately I think some of us here just have wildly different needs/contexts for our gear usage, and may never fully see eye to eye.

I’m not evangelizing those parameters having to exist to compete against fractal. I’m just saying users looking for that level of specificity are unlikely to migrate to a platform that lacks it if they are coming from one that offers it.
 
Back
Top