Kemper Profiler MK 2

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 490
  • Start date Start date
Anecdotal, but yeah I call bullshit on type B being more robust.
Line 6 stadium - usb-c
Fractal VP-4 - usb-c
NDSP Nano Cortex - usb-c
Tonex One - usb-c

The only one to release a product in the past 2 years that's not USB-C seems to be Kemper. I think it's safe to say these companies will be using it moving forwards on any future products.

Not the same category but still high end products:

Strymon Big Sky MX and all the smaller ones- usb-c
Meris LXV, Merc X, Enzo X - usb-c
Eventide H90 - usb-c
 
Line 6 stadium - usb-c
Fractal VP-4 - usb-c
NDSP Nano Cortex - usb-c
Tonex One - usb-c

The only one to release a product in the past 2 years that's not USB-C seems to be Kemper. I think it's safe to say these companies will be using it moving forwards on any future products.

Not the same category but still high end products:

Strymon Big Sky MX and all the smaller ones- usb-c
Meris LXV, Merc X, Enzo X - usb-c
Eventide H90 - usb-c
Just to be clear, wasn't saying you were bullshitting; just that others who had said that were. It's good all of those devices are USB-C, because I feel it's a better connection, having been using it for 10 years already.
 
Just to be clear, wasn't saying you were bullshitting; just that others who had said that were. It's good all of those devices are USB-C, because I feel it's a better connection, having been using it for 10 years already.
All good, I know. I was just adding to your comment before someone came and chimed in that USB-C isn't sturdy or 'pro' despite all signs that pretty much every other major company in this space seems to have used it on their newest releases and the entire world moving towards it as a unified cable type.
 
Honestly I prefer USB-B over USB-C for these things because I'm lazy and like to use the nice long cables I already have :p

I can see smaller desktop units being better with USB-C especially if they're bus powered. And obviously anything that needs to be charged should be USB-C.
 
Honestly I prefer USB-B over USB-C for these things because I'm lazy and like to use the nice long cables I already have :p

I can see smaller desktop units being better with USB-C especially if they're bus powered. And obviously anything that needs to be charged should be USB-C.
I thought it would be at least a few comments before someone said that Kemper shouldn't change to USB-C because owners already owned USB-B cables...haha
 
Which is the real amp is not the relevant question. Can you hear differences is the relevant question, and yes, I can. They are massive. The first clip has a very different mid-range texture, and the low-end seems more subdued than the second clip. Second clip has a smoother mid range.

I won't guess which is the real amp, but what I would say is, I preferred the second clip. I would not be happy with the first clip, whether it was the real amp or the Kemper.
We have had this same discussion in the NAM comparison thread awhile ago. Same type of differences.

The readers can judge for themselves
 
That's fair. However, it's annoying to me that I'd dial in a tone, and get a different one, and your clip shows. If you like one of the tones, you won't necessarily like the other. Do you then try to EQ it? Redo the profile?
Definitely understand.

I didn't EQ or adjust the profile at all. I did do the profile twice and I was picking a little hard while refining the first one.
 
We have had this same discussion in the NAM comparison thread awhile ago. Same type of differences.

The readers can judge for themselves
Couldn't find the thread. Anyone with a link? NAM has come significantly closer to source than Kemper in my own tests, so I'd like to see this comparison.
 
Old comparison of mine. Hope this doesn't count as trying to promote my channel or whatever. But pay attention to the mids of Kemper vs the real Laney. That is what I hope the new profiling fixes, the "mosquito" quality current profiling has produced for me.

 
Last edited:
Couldn't find the thread. Anyone with a link? NAM has come significantly closer to source than Kemper in my own tests, so I'd like to see this comparison.
Not sure what i was remembering but I think it was this and obviously it isn't NAM.

 
I thought it would be at least a few comments before someone said that Kemper shouldn't change to USB-C because owners already owned USB-B cables...haha

Oh it's everything lol. On my desk I used to have an HX Stomp, then a Quad Cortex, now a Kemper Profiler, etc. I had to go digging around looking for a USB-C cable to plug in and update my UAD Ox Stomp!
 
Most people don't realize that there is one real USP with Kemper, that no other platform has: the combination of their proprietary Kone speaker and in the Profiler the models of most common guitar speakers matched to that Kone (called Imprints).

If you run a powered Kemper or an unpowered one through a power amp to a Kone cab and set your preferred Imprint (V30, Greenback, ...) you get it very damn close to actual amp in the room feel, at any volume. The Imprint gives you a quick change of tone and you can adjust directivity of the powered Kone signal. It really works and is the one thing that makes it in my ears so superior to any digital solution out there.
 
Most people don't realize that there is one real USP with Kemper, that no other platform has: the combination of their proprietary Kone speaker and in the Profiler the models of most common guitar speakers matched to that Kone (called Imprints).

If you run a powered Kemper or an unpowered one through a power amp to a Kone cab and set your preferred Imprint (V30, Greenback, ...) you get it very damn close to actual amp in the room feel, at any volume. The Imprint gives you a quick change of tone and you can adjust directivity of the powered Kone signal. It really works and is the one thing that makes it in my ears so superior to any digital solution out there.
I’ve always wondered about that. When you play out are you using different speaker models or sticking to one? Mic’ing the Kone or DI? In theory it seems cool (same with the speaker modeling in the PowerCab) but in use I’d probably just pick one and stick with it for consistency live. For recording if I’m not mic’ing a cab it wouldn’t even come up.
 
Most people don't realize that there is one real USP with Kemper, that no other platform has: the combination of their proprietary Kone speaker and in the Profiler the models of most common guitar speakers matched to that Kone (called Imprints).

If you run a powered Kemper or an unpowered one through a power amp to a Kone cab and set your preferred Imprint (V30, Greenback, ...) you get it very damn close to actual amp in the room feel, at any volume. The Imprint gives you a quick change of tone and you can adjust directivity of the powered Kone signal. It really works and is the one thing that makes it in my ears so superior to any digital solution out there.
Serious question: how's it better than a power amp and guitar cab, besides the ability to keep switching speaker emulations (which I'd never do live anyway)?

Don't get me wrong; it's a cool piece of tech, but I question it's usefulness in the grand scheme of things.
 
I’ve always wondered about that. When you play out are you using different speaker models or sticking to one? Mic’ing the Kone or DI? In theory it seems cool (same with the speaker modeling in the PowerCab) but in use I’d probably just pick one and stick with it for consistency live. For recording if I’m not mic’ing a cab it wouldn’t even come up.
I use one for dirt and one for cleans, full range for acoustic. But to PA I go direct, the Kone is for stage sound and on small gigs for filling.
 
Most people don't realize that there is one real USP with Kemper, that no other platform has: the combination of their proprietary Kone speaker and in the Profiler the models of most common guitar speakers matched to that Kone (called Imprints).

Hasn't Line 6 been doing this with Powercabs since 2018?
 
Back
Top