Helix JCM800 2203 Request Thread (FW 3.70 new Brit 2203)!

Out of curiosity, I did a quick shootout this morning.

Set up in Logic Pro four tracks with the Axe FX 3 USB input. For the first three tracks, I used the guitar DI signal through a plugin (amp only) through an Impulsive IR loader. For the fourth track, I ran an amp block in the Fractal into the Impulsive IR loader. Basically, same guitar signal through three different plugins and the Axe FX, all into the same IR.

Helix Native (Brit 2204) was obviously quite high gain and I had to drop it back to about 2, but it was also really dark sounding and kind of fuzzy/choppy in the gain. Sounded better if you crank the treble/presence and drop the bass/mids but it's definitely different.

ML Amped 800 had the bright high end but was lacking a lot of bass. Gain was a little hot but not as much as the Helix. Didn't spend much time here due to the annoying intermittent muting of the trial.

NDSP Tim Henson is pretty balanced with a bit of a mid scoop. Gain was the lowest of the four and had to be brought up to at least 3:00 for crunch. It had the high end bite you expect from an 800 but seemed to add back a little bit of the low end to balance it out. Not sure if that's a mod or not, but very pleasant sounding.

Fractal Brit 800 was very close to the NDSP but more balanced without the mid scoop. I was surprised because normally I find it to be very bright but in comparison to the rest, it's quite balanced. Had to bump the gain up to about 6.

All four cleaned up pretty well with the volume knob.

Now the closest thing I found to the Fractal Brit 800 in Helix was the Placater. Leave the fat and C45 switches on, drop the gain a bit, cut back the bass to about 2 and the mid a little to taste, and boost the treble and presence up to 6. Very much in the ballpark. Now with the volume knob down it tends to be fuller than the 800 which gets bright, but in a mix it should be close.

Very impressed by the NDSP though, despite all the bad press, it's a great sounding plugin for the 800 thing.
 
Out of curiosity, I did a quick shootout this morning.

Set up in Logic Pro four tracks with the Axe FX 3 USB input. For the first three tracks, I used the guitar DI signal through a plugin (amp only) through an Impulsive IR loader. For the fourth track, I ran an amp block in the Fractal into the Impulsive IR loader. Basically, same guitar signal through three different plugins and the Axe FX, all into the same IR.

Helix Native (Brit 2204) was obviously quite high gain and I had to drop it back to about 2, but it was also really dark sounding and kind of fuzzy/choppy in the gain. Sounded better if you crank the treble/presence and drop the bass/mids but it's definitely different.

ML Amped 800 had the bright high end but was lacking a lot of bass. Gain was a little hot but not as much as the Helix. Didn't spend much time here due to the annoying intermittent muting of the trial.

NDSP Tim Henson is pretty balanced with a bit of a mid scoop. Gain was the lowest of the four and had to be brought up to at least 3:00 for crunch. It had the high end bite you expect from an 800 but seemed to add back a little bit of the low end to balance it out. Not sure if that's a mod or not, but very pleasant sounding.

Fractal Brit 800 was very close to the NDSP but more balanced without the mid scoop. I was surprised because normally I find it to be very bright but in comparison to the rest, it's quite balanced. Had to bump the gain up to about 6.

All four cleaned up pretty well with the volume knob.

Now the closest thing I found to the Fractal Brit 800 in Helix was the Placater. Leave the fat and C45 switches on, drop the gain a bit, cut back the bass to about 2 and the mid a little to taste, and boost the treble and presence up to 6. Very much in the ballpark. Now with the volume knob down it tends to be fuller than the 800 which gets bright, but in a mix it should be close.

Very impressed by the NDSP though, despite all the bad press, it's a great sounding plugin for the 800 thing.

Hmmm, maybe I’m an 800 guy then and I don’t even know it… The placater setting you describe is pretty much my go-to for that kind of sound.

D
 
I'm really having a blast with these 800 presets and the placater settings given in the thread. @James Freeman, I think I have seen you talking about really liking the Plumes pedal thing. What would be a good start for a boost in front of your 800 settings if I didn't want to use the 808? I feel like I may need some of the compression a distortion box adds, but I guess I could just turn up the first or second EQ more
 
Now the closest thing I found to the Fractal Brit 800 in Helix was the Placater. Leave the fat and C45 switches on, drop the gain a bit, cut back the bass to about 2 and the mid a little to taste, and boost the treble and presence up to 6. Very much in the ballpark. Now with the volume knob down it tends to be fuller than the 800 which gets bright, but in a mix it should be close.
What was the cab/mic/IR you used?
 
Plumes (Pillars) pedal thing, What would be a good start for a boost in front of your 800 settings

Gain 2.5, Tone 6, Level 4, Mode 2.
Lower gain and boost Level to taste, Mode 2 has no clipping diodes so it's basically a clean boost with very high 18Vpp headroom.
You can test the headroom of the Pillars without an amp afterwards.
In my opinion this is the best boost in the Helix, until I find a better one that is.
 
Gain 2.5, Tone 6, Level 4, Mode 2.
Lower gain and boost Level to taste, Mode 2 has no clipping diodes so it's basically a clean boost with very high 18Vpp headroom.
You can test the headroom of the Pillars without an amp afterwards.
In my opinion this is the best boost in the Helix, until I find a better one that is.

I wasn't really enjoying it into a Helix amp through studio monitors tbh. then I tried it into my JVM and it sounds fantastic. I've been using the pillars, transistor tape delay, the adriatic delay and some of the dynamic reverbs with crunch channel orange mode on the jvm. It sounds fantastic.
 
Plumes is about 24dB hotter than a Tube Screamer when set to Mode 2.
With TS Level at 10 I had to set the Plumes Level at 1.8 (Mode 2 - no clipping diodes) and Level at 3.6 (Mode 1 - LEDs) to have the same output volume, so if you use the same settings as on the TS you will drive the amp model input beyond the point of sounding good.

Just listen to the Plumes in Mode 2 without anything else in the chain to understand the amount of boost this thing has.
 
Uargh... let me know for real this time: Is this the place where we can b*tch about Helix stuff like missing stock 2203 and 5153 WITHOUT some ambient dork chiming in,
But only a good Marshall gets the “cities crumbling on the horizon” tone that is part of my ambient palate.
 
Church Music:barf
Depends on the type of church… ;-)
1687461183394.gif
 
Gain 2.5, Tone 6, Level 4, Mode 2.
Lower gain and boost Level to taste, Mode 2 has no clipping diodes so it's basically a clean boost with very high 18Vpp headroom.
You can test the headroom of the Pillars without an amp afterwards.
In my opinion this is the best boost in the Helix, until I find a better one that is.
This is doing some very interesting things! Its almost like its clean at some spots but plenty of distortion, I keep finding myself trying to play this section where the high strings are kind of clean and the low notes are distorted

 
(JMP era>>>>JCM800 era but we can have that debate later).

The 2203 preamp is exactly the same, voltages and all until 1985, but there was a change in the Poweramp in 1978.
Before 1978 (for two years) the JMP 2203 had a 5k Presence pot and the negative feedback was tapped form the 8ohm output, resulting in more negative feedback and a slightly smoother more "polite" sounding 2203, other than that the 2203 didn't change form 1978 to 1985.
Plenty of info on that on Metropoulos and Marshall forums.

76 JMP 2203u.gif


The JMP vs JCM 2204 is a whole 'nother can of worms.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top