Fractal Audio Systems mystery product speculation

What is it not it is? Is it?

  • None of the above

  • Electric sex pants

  • Unsliced Bread

  • JiveTurkey's resolve to "innovate" with audio signal routing

  • Lab grown "safe & guilt-free" toe meat


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Poo switches for me faaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaarrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr outweigh a touch screen. Like, by near infinite levels.
08af746a-af89-4066-91b6-3869f6d94481_text.gif
 
No touch vote from me to… as if anyone cares haha! But yeah… no thanks. Things built to be on the floor, knobs and switches. Things built to be used on a desk, fine… touch my tralala… and sliders!!!

Sliders!!!!
 
Last edited:
So... don't touch the touchscreen? I mean, sure, it would add a bit of cost, but it wouldn't have to detract from usability or depth in any way whatsoever. People are becoming accustomed to screens being responsive to touch. (Nearly all of us have smartphones in our pockets right now.) There are times when touching an on-screen element to make something happen is simply the most efficient and intuitive thing. (You can actually quantify how efficient and intuitive it would be by counting the fingerprints on my FM3 screen.)

Just because you don't want it doesn't mean it isn't an improvement. I'm willing to bet if it were there you'd use it before too long, and you might even (very quietly) prefer it for some things.
Adding a touch screen would almost certainly include removing many/most front panel knobs.

Additionally, more complexity in stuff like that makes durability/reliability go down.

And touch screens are various levels of quality. The ones on good phones are very good quality which is more cost...

And they don't work well with sweaty fingers!
 
Adding a touch screen would almost certainly include removing many/most front panel knobs.
Not necessarily. Adding a touchscreen could obviate the need for several of the archaic (and in some instances redundant) buttons, possibly even freeing up some room for knobs. Get into hybrid encoder/ switches and things open up even more.

Additionally, more complexity in stuff like that makes durability/reliability go down.
A solid state, water-proof part versus multiple moving parts that require holes in the top of the enclosure? I'm not convinced this is true.

And touch screens are various levels of quality. The ones on good phones are very good quality which is more cost...
Cost concern is legit. It's obviously up to the designer to strike a happy medium.

And they don't work well with sweaty fingers!
Uh... Wipe your fingers on your shirt? :idk
 
So... don't touch the touchscreen? I mean, sure, it would add a bit of cost, but it wouldn't have to detract from usability or depth in any way whatsoever. People are becoming accustomed to screens being responsive to touch. (Nearly all of us have smartphones in our pockets right now.) There are times when touching an on-screen element to make something happen is simply the most efficient and intuitive thing. (You can actually quantify how efficient and intuitive it would be by counting the fingerprints on my FM3 screen.)

Just because you don't want it doesn't mean it isn't an improvement. I'm willing to bet if it were there you'd use it before too long, and you might even (very quietly) prefer it for some things.

Let’s discuss this offline, hit me up on my cell…

giphy.gif
 
I was anti-touchscreen (on floor units) until I owned the Quad Cortex. Then I realized it’s actually great.
I’m sure its great but come on modelers touchscreens won’t never be as great as your phone or tablet screens.
I’d rather fractal enabled some built in Bluetooth and release official apps instead of paying 200€ for a touchscreen that would fuck my gig if there’s some rain or humidity.
Touchscreens are not built for gigs, or maybe yes but that would cost too much to have them waterproof
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top