Fractal Audio Systems mystery product speculation

[laxu]

TBH, for me individually, the FX loop isn't necessary because I could just throw it into one of the loops on the QC, or in my larger board one of the loops on my GigRig G3.

For me, a stereo fx loop isn't particularly necessary. I think most people who want an fx loop would use it with their mono amp. There's always the FM3/FM9 for stereo if you need it.

 

[DLC86]

But that is definitely 6 white 'Fractal-esque' labels on the right side of the screen, which to me implies 6 buttons. I think there are probably LED's below that with white labelling too.

Maybe they revamped the unforgettable AX8 UI

It's 6 buttons if you ditch the SHIFT

EDIT: well, the FX8 had 6 buttons and 5 knobs actually... coincidence?

 

[laxu]

Maybe they revamped the unforgettable AX8 UI
View attachment 29829
It's 6 buttons if you ditch the SHIFT

EDIT: well, the FX8 had 6 buttons actually... coincidence?

View attachment 29830

The Shift button is the single worst UI decision Fractal has ever made.

On the current gen, the arrangement of the buttons is IMO terrible with the navigation buttons so far from the knobs and screen that it's often easier to operate the big knob and navigation buttons.

Going between nav/page buttons and under screen knobs is like this:

 

[Orvillain]

The Shift button is the single worst UI decision Fractal has ever made.

Hard disagree actually. Now I will qualify this with, I never used the AX8 and the implementation of the SHIFT button. But I find SHIFT buttons incredibly incredibly INCREDIBLY useful; see Elektron Digitakt, which uses a func "shift" button, which really helps to give you a ton more functionality without fucking up the workflow too much.

There's a way to do it where it is smooth as butter. Like a guitar fretboard, covered in British monkey grease.

On the current gen, the arrangement of the buttons is IMO terrible with the navigation buttons so far from the knobs and screen that it's often easier to operate the big knob and navigation buttons.

I recently did some comparisons between Helix, QC, and Axe3. Just editing on the front panel. Trying to save a preset and change the name on the unit directly... much more painful than the other two!! There are many many instances on the Axe3 where you need to use two hands. That should be a big no-no for a product like that IMHO.

 

[laxu]

Hard disagree actually. Now I will qualify this with, I never used the AX8 and the implementation of the SHIFT button. But I find SHIFT buttons incredibly incredibly INCREDIBLY useful; see Elektron Digitakt, which uses a func "shift" button, which really helps to give you a ton more functionality without fucking up the workflow too much.

There's a place for them. It is not "Hold Shift and press Page to go to previous page". I have a Shift button on my Hydrasynth Explorer and it's useful for some functions but really not my favorite way to do it because you need two hands to work with it.

I recently did some comparisons between Helix, QC, and Axe3. Just editing on the front panel. Trying to save a preset and change the name on the unit directly... much more painful than the other two!! There are many many instances on the Axe3 where you need to use two hands. That should be a big no-no for a product like that IMHO.

Yeah I feel most guitar gear is used with one hand at a time. You have one hand holding your guitar, or strumming it while you turn a knob etc.

 

[jellodog]

For me, a stereo fx loop isn't particularly necessary. I think most people who want an fx loop would use it with their mono amp. There's always the FM3/FM9 for stereo if you need it.

Agreed. When I was in my pedalboard amp phase, I'd just put the preamp wherever I wanted it, delay / reverb / modulation right after; no need for a loop.

If this unit is what we think it is i.e. an FX-only pedalboard-friendly device, that's pretty much how I'd use it.

Boost / Drive pedal ---> Preamp (e.g. IR-D) ---> FAS FX device ---> DI or Power Amp

 

[yek]

The Shift button is the single worst UI decision Fractal has ever made.

Yup, I much preferred the FX8 controls to those on the AX8. Because of SHIFT.

 

[BenIfin]

No software, just deduction from what we've all seen.
Look:

View attachment 29826

Here it's pretty clear that there are 3 pairs of jacks, and they're definitely grouped in pairs cuz there's a label centered between two jacks, a horizontal line below and then 2 labels, one above each jack (the labels on the left pair are partially covered by a cable in this pic). The labels below the line in the first two pairs are a longer one for the left jack and a single letter for the right jack, on the third pair both are a single letter/number.

Now, do you have some other possible hypothesis over what they could be labeled other than this?

INPUT​	OUTPUT​	PEDAL​
____________________________​	____________________________​	____________________________​
L/MONO . . . . . . . . . . . . R​	L/MONO . . . . . . . . . . . . R​	1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2​

From this other pic it's pretty clear that the third pair is for exp pedal cuz the cable from there goes straight to the expression pedal

View attachment 29827

Man ... you should be a forensic photo-analyst

Maybe the odds of my bet of an EFX-only unit are getting longer and longer ....

If (?) its got EFX and Amps and its shooting for the sub-FM3 market (?) ..... it might be a pre-curated set of Amps, EFX, Cabs (?)

If thats the case (?) and the full FM3 is currently US $1099 ...... I'll go out on another limb and say this will be a US $699 or US $799 unit ..... any more than that would make the full FM3 look too attractive.

I wonder if I put enough guesses and (?)'s in this post

 

[FuzzyAce]

 

[Los-D]

What if instead of HxFx or FX8, something more like this (which I loved at the time)?

 

[Los-D]

Why? Don’t you have an fm3/9

There’s room for all

 

[Jarick]

It kinda looks like the far right knob is a little further away from the group so maybe that’s the value knob?

 

[DLC86]

Man ... you should be a forensic photo-analyst

Maybe the odds of my bet of an EFX-only unit are getting longer and longer ....

If (?) its got EFX and Amps and its shooting for the sub-FM3 market (?) ..... it might be a pre-curated set of Amps, EFX, Cabs (?)

If thats the case (?) and the full FM3 is currently US $1099 ...... I'll go out on another limb and say this will be a US $699 or US $799 unit ..... any more than that would make the full FM3 look too attractive.

I wonder if I put enough guesses and (?)'s in this post

If you're right on all those things it'll be an instant buy for me, even if it's just 4 blocks in series... But I doubt it has amps personally.

 

[Rock Chalk]

You guys just gonna buy cause it’s fractal? Even if you own the fm3/6 or axefx? Seems redundant

The fan boys will though just because it’s fractal and they have money to burn

Awwwe, isn't that cuuute? He's worried about who's buying what........

 

[Los-D]

It kinda looks like the far right knob is a little further away from the group so maybe that’s the value knob?

While we are at it, what is this?
<< Insert nip/slip or knob jokes here >>

 

[DrewJD82]

You guys just gonna buy cause it’s fractal? Even if you own the fm3/6 or axefx? Seems redundant

Yep. I’m going to put it in a loop in my FM9 that’s in a loop in my AxeFX. And I’m going to use the exact same effects blocks with the exact same settings in each device for extra redundancy. Maybe I’ll be really crazy and set the Feedback on one delay block to 33.4% instead of 33.3% just to see who notices.

 

[bigmenace]

My vision is going blurry from looking at all these zoomed in images.

 

[laxu]

My vision is going blurry from looking at all these zoomed in images.

Sounds like you could use a new pair of glasses!

 

[KHAAAAAAANNNNNNN!!!!!!!!]

Due to recent events I've officially changed my vote in the poll to 'electric sex pants' for reasons I'd rather not divulge.

 

[jellodog]

You guys just gonna buy cause it’s fractal? Even if you own the fm3/6 or axefx? Seems redundant

Sir, this is a guitar GEAR forum.