Tritium3H
Groupie
- Messages
- 69
Being that this seems like the most used TMP tread, I thought it made the most sense to post my review here. I just finished spending over a month testing the Tone Master Pro next to my Fractal FM3. A month prior to my run with the TMP, I spent a month and a half with the Stadium XL next to my FM3. I thought I would type up my general impressions of the TMP compared to the FM3 and Stadium XL. Hopefully others will find this information helpful and Fender can use some of it to improve the TMP.
Pros:
- Synth: TMP has 3 polyphonic guitar synths and they sound and work very well with both single notes and chords. Tracking accuracy and speed is pretty impressive. Not sure how they compare to a dedicated guitar synth from Roland/Boss, but compared to Fractal, Helix, QC, etc. TMP is in a class of its own. IMO this is the TMP stand out feature early 2026. Hopefully Fender can add more classic presets to help users get started and better understand what can be done.
- UI: Overall I like the UI on the TMP. Sometimes it requires more steps than ideal and sometimes touches aren't registered on the first try, but overall very nice. The use of poo switches is dramatically better than on QC simply because of the scribble strips. I never grabbed the wrong knob by accident, plus they are really smooth and accurate. I find it strange they didn't use the same switches in place of the two big knobs adding two more foot switches and options.
- UI, iOS and computer apps all look the same. If you know how to use one, you can use them all. I found this to be a major positive.
- Bluetooth iOS apps
- Audio Interface is good enough to use and monitor plugins on your computer. Latency is very low, almost as good as my dedicated Thunderbolt audio interface. Much better than FM3 or Helix Stadium in my experience.
- Fuzzes: some of the fuzzes sound and feel pretty good compared to FM3 that doesn't have a variable impedance input.
- Signal to noise ratio seems very good and on par with Fractal and Stadium and better than the QC.
- Analog loops work well for adding drive/fuzz pedals.
Cons:
Overall, there was a lot I liked about the TMP. But there were enough shortcomings that I still preferred using my FM3 even though its UI is not as intuitive or as much fun to use. Hopefully Fender will continue to rapidly improve the TMP, as it seems like there is a fair amount of untapped potential in the unit that could keep it more
- Amp Tones and Feel: Amp tones and feel are very good overall, but sometimes not up to Fractal or Stadium Agoura quality in my opinion. Playing dynamics and guitar volume knob adjustments are behind Fractal and the new Helix Stadium amps in my experience. I actually found it surprising after reading all the praise of their Fender models in particular that they didn't clean up nearly as well with the guitar volume knob. If they did clean up the volume dropped a lot and they got thin and less pleasing to the ear.
- Drive/amp interaction: While the drives have a nice UI with most knobs and switches modeled similar to Helix, I did not find the resulting tones as good as my FM3 (fuzzes excluded). I found drives on the FM3 to be more dynamic, warmer, rounder and just a joy to play. TMP drives feel stiffer, strident, and less dynamic.
- Speaker Impedance Curves (SIC) with IR: Something is not right about SIC implementation with 3rd party IR. Changing SIC dramatically changes the sound, often in a bad way, compared to doing the same thing in Fractal device. I ended up only using the built in cabs because of this issue.
- CPU/DSP can run short pretty quickly when trying to use dual amps or cabs and some other CPU hungry effects. My understanding is half the CPU is reserved for seamless preset changes. I REALLY wish Fender would make seamless preset changes optional so I could use all the CPU for more complex kitchen sink presets. I find splitting complex presets into multiple presets to be clunky and hard to keep in sync compared to using scenes.
- Lack of Block Channels: Fractal style gappless channels are incredibly useful and allow limited CPU resources to go a lot further.
- Looper: The looper is actually pretty nice except it doesn't offer quantization, metronome, a threshold option to start recording and some other usability improvements found in other loopers. A few updates would move the looper into a pro.
- Effects: Some of the effects are really good, but overall I feel that Fractal, and lesser so Stadium, have better quality and options. But overall, what the TMP offers will be good enough for most users.
- No Profiling: I think they should add a NAM player block and librarian to quickly fill in some of the amp gaps and give users more options.
- No Scene Toggle Footswitch Option: Add scene toggle function similar to Fractals so users can for example toggle between scene 1 and 2 with a single footswitch. Stack the scene labels on the scribble strip with one being in white, the other black with colors reversing to show which is currently in use. Similar to how some scribble strips are currently used in the looper.
- No push and hold secondary footswitch functions
- Expand the push two buttons at once functions to include more than just the DAW tools most won't use.
- Lack of SPIDF.
- Routing: Not being able to drag and drop items to split the path seems very unintuitive and clunky.
- Volume balancing: It's a mess as is. Please add a volume balancing icon that pops up a window with meters with a suggested target, important volume controls, controls for saving, switching scenes, presets, etc.
- Compressors are very basic and poor overall.
- I really wished many of the effects, especially delays, had some more advanced controls or an advanced page. I really missed having a ratio option, ducking and some other controls.
I Also agree that this was a very thoughtful and well-balanced review. Well done, AZG.
It is funny how we (all of us) hear and perceive differences between various modelers, and weigh and assign advantages/disadvantages, strengths/weaknesses.
For example, as much as I love my Fractal FM9T, I absolutely prefer the tone and dynamics of the Fender models in my TMP. I do tend to prefer the Marshall models in the Fractal. However, with that said, there are instances of high gain amps I prefer in the TMP, as compared to the FM9T. These would be the Soldano SLO-100, the Diezel Hebert. the Friedman BE-100, and the EVH 6505. Also, the new Hiwatt DR-105 is friggin amazing. But then again, probably my all-time favorite amp model is the Marshall Plexi 50 Watt 6CA7 in the FM9T.
I don’t have a criticism for the implementation of the SICs in the TMP, simply because I find the built-in IRs and graphical selection/positioning of mics to be the CAT’s MEOW. I never felt the need to use third-party IRs. Incidentally, the same goes for my Fractal — absolutely love the DynaCabs. I am never looking back or going back to endless 3rd-party IR auditioning…when the TMP and Fractal nailed it with their virtual DynaCab implementations.