Sascha Franck
Rock Star
- Messages
- 6,190
Oh, fwiw, the Wan'er are considerably louder, at least on my Samsung S10.
Oh, fwiw, the Wan'er are considerably louder, at least on my Samsung S10.
Kiwi Ears Cadenza (35$).
Compared to the 7Hz they have slightly more bass and slightly less pierce/shout (ear gain), overall even better tuned than the 7Hz in my opinion.
These also are not bass heavy but tuned to the Harman curve to sound like calibrated monitors in a good room which is the current trend/race in the audiophile IEM/Headphones community.
If you are looking for balanced sounding IEMs under 50$, these are the ones to buy (as of end of 2022) in my opinion.
Very nice packaging and hard box.
View attachment 3293
Comes with plenty of tips.
View attachment 3296
View attachment 3294
Also got a nice case and quality 2pin 0.78mm cable to complete the ChiFi IEM experience, both from OpenHeart on Aliexpress which I can personally vouch for their quality.
View attachment 3295
Some Youtube hype.
My old 1964-V3 set is rated at a sensitivity of 119 dB, which is supposedly also the Chu 2 sensitivity rating, and the V3s were loud enough with my IEM amp (an old PSM 200 system). I've joined a band that uses IEMs for rehearsal and performance and I've been using Sennheiser HD569 headphones as I did not like the tone of the V3s or the SE215s, so hoping the Chu 2s will work out.Just some more observations: For my ear canals, given the delivered ear plugs, I'm finding the Chu II easier to fit in so I'm getting more balanced low end response (haven't tried any foam plugs, will likely order some, I think they might be an easier deal overall...). But once they fit in properly, I seem to slightly prefer the Wan'er.
And well, in case your IEM headphone amp is on the weak side, the Chus might have issues getting loud enough on some stages (for instance when you have to fight bleed from drums next to you), the Wan'ers are quite substantially louder.
Soundwise, I'm actually still not sure what to think, I thought one of the last gigs was an IEM one, but it's all been wedge stuff (which I was actually happy about, so I didn't try to arrange an IEM setup on my own), so all my tests are still based just on home noodling and running (which I won't be using any of the two for, but it's a nice litmus test to see if the plugs stay tight).
I actually think I prefer the cheap Sennheisers (around €80) but couldn't compare as I broke the cable on my last pair.
A properly fitted custom mold should always provide better isolation than a universal fit, though...My old 1964-V3 set is rated at a sensitivity of 119 dB, which is supposedly also the Chu 2 sensitivity rating, and the V3s were loud enough with my IEM amp (an old PSM 200 system). I've joined a band that uses IEMs for rehearsal and performance and I've been using Sennheiser HD569 headphones as I did not like the tone of the V3s or the SE215s, so hoping the Chu 2s will work out.
Also, I was wondering if anybody with Chu 2s has any issues with the cap, as Tex reported about the 1s?
Where do you get the foam tips for these?
Put a high-shelf EQ filter at between 2 and 5hz with a slope of around 12dB/octave (0.71 Q, I think) and bump the gain on it by between +2 and +6 dB. "Air" is a bit vague and can be even higher, like above 7 and 8khz, so it'll depend on what exactly you think of as air. Treble starts around 2kz though, so that's where I suggest starting. Then move it up until you don't like the results and then back it down in frequency a little. That's my recommendation.Received a set of Kiwi Ears Cadenza today thanks to @James Freeman’s recommendation.
Absolutely floored how good they sound for the price. However, I feel like I could use slightly more “air” or top end. The rest of the frequency spectrum does the job for me.
Anyone know which set would add slightly more in the upper frequency range while retaining an identical response with everything below?