Fwiw, just as a side observation (but defenitely something already crossing my mind several times before): Have you ever seen, say, a multi-amp modeler review going so much into the details on a per amp base as quite some folks (Rabea Massaad included) are doing with the UAFX pedals? Yeah, there's a video of John Cordy exploring the HX's Grammatico GSG pretty thoroughly, but that's quite the exception rather than the norm (within the FAS ecosystem it seems to be a little more common, I remember some videos going through, say, all M-style amps, all F-styles and what not).
What I'm saying is: It's not unlikely that quite some qualities of whatever "full" modelers are hardly ever covered whereas the qualities of those pedals with less functionality are explored down to the last minutiae.
I would even consider this to be expectable, pretty much just another aspect of option paralysis, but still, it's possibly food for thought. I mean, just by asking myself: How often did I actually explore the possibilities of the HX ecosystem's amps down to the last detail? As in checking all parameters, their interaction, using various cabs and mics, running them along with dirt boxes in front, etc. The answer is that I did that with perhaps just two amps (fwiw, the Princess and the L6 2204 Mod, which have been the ones I was using the most when I had the Floor). And not even all *that* thoroughly. It's probably not too clever not doing so for some of the others, because I certainly got a whole lot of mileage out of those I explored better (for the most obvious reasons of course).
As said, likely just another aspect of option paralysis.
