Ed DeGenaro
Shredder
- Messages
- 1,013
Let's put it like this, I much prefer Ox over any other IR.I left the video playing in the background as I type this post and honestly I could not tell where the switches were or which was which.
This pretty much matches my experiences. If you do a good job at matching the tones and levels, and make the signal chain as reasonably close as you can, they sound so close that other features should matter more. I'd take a HX Stomp over the UA pedals any day because it does so much more in one box.
I don't think it's flawed at all, but instead minimizing variables and making switching and setting up much easier.
I haven't found that running e.g a "tube amp -> reactive load -> DAW -> VST plugin IR" vs "tube amp -> reactive load -> Fractal -> Fractal cab sim using the same IR" to produce any real difference in results.
If you record a DI track or loop of your performance with whichever unit you prefer, piping that DI through the pedal and modeler any "feel" is already out of the equation because you're no longer playing directly.
That said it like IRs are a much bigger "equalizer" then a speaker and mic even at whisper volume.
For me it comes down to the attack aspect of the sound.
Whatever happened to the front end with gag of the note going from.0 to peak and the drop on the way there.
On digital stuff i call this the fun factor.
And I gotta say I don't think any multi sound Digi device using the same input, will have a change in that between "amps".
Mosdef not in the frontend
Although I doubt the UAFX boxes have different input stuff.