the-trooper
Shredder
- Messages
- 1,882
John Nathan Cordy does not agree!This post is Jonathan Nathan Cordy-approved.
John Nathan Cordy does not agree!This post is Jonathan Nathan Cordy-approved.
With IK's Tonex pedal out now, I think many forget that the QC can run up to 8 captures in one preset which definitely lets you do a lot more with them if needed, either by using them as dual amps in parallel, switching between multiple settings on your favorite amp or having some stompbox captures in the mix. While most users won't really need that, it's at least an option that is unique to the QC.
To be fair the Tonex has this as well with their VIR cabs. Helix implemented a similar system and Fractal is soon to follow so it's not a unique feature anymore. Was great on release though.Yep. And you have a really nice collection of cab IR’s where you can freely position mics for each one, and route them in any number of ways. Not useful for everyone, but it’s not really offered by anything else like that (combines various aspects that other modellers have but in a way that is pretty decent for the user).
Yeah touchscreen definitely makes it more user friendly which is why I was surprised that both Line6 and Fractal decided to implement something similar rather than leaving it as a next gen feature. I think Line6 actually did a fairly good job and having that movable mic UI on HX Edit goes a long way. I hope Fractal can manage to make their onboard UI decent, I expect Axe-Edit will be fine.Yeah, I actually quite like VIR but it suffers from IK’s approach to UI. It’s so close to being incredible but it’s so clunky to use. Helix is pretty good now, but maybe a bit more limited in choice. The experience is definitely nice to use in a pinch though, which is something Line 6 are pretty good at staying on top of. I look forward to seeing how Fractal do it - I don’t really use their included IR’s as I like to have more control between mic positions, and looking at a list of random IR’s isn’t really a process I like. Part of me expects it to be amazing as far as control and features, and it’ll suffer with the experience side a little. Will happily be proven wrong, but dragging a mic on a touch screen is one of very few things I actually find a touchscreen useful for.
You can edit the VIR cabs on the pedal itself. The UI is very clunky for that but it is possible. User IRs have to be set to a preset it seems.On the HW ToneX pedal, I don’t believe you can freely mix and match IR’s or route the signal through different ones at the same time? AFAIK, you have to save them as presets first and import them in.
Not atm afaik. IK's X-Drive pedal has this feature so I hope they implement it on the Tonex pedal as well.can you send an amp DI and IR signal out at the same time?
Yeah you can do that.I hadn’t actually thought about it but does it have a bypass for the amp block? would even be handy as just an IR loader in a pinch.
I'd say the appeal is exactly the simplification. If you can avoid trawling through menus and just changing presets and tweaking it like an amp, that will be good enough for most people who will pair this with their favorite pedals. I don't think the pedal itself is very good if you need to tweak the cabs but at least you have more options to do so than what e.g Strymon Iridium or UA pedals offer because those just give you a toggle switch and nothing else.Regardless, for navigating through a load of cabs and IR’s I’d much rather a larger screen like Fractal/Helix/Kemper/QC all use. Quite easy to counter it with ToneX isn’t aimed at me and it’s supposed to be simple, but I’d really like a pedal to solve several problems in one rather than require the use of other gear. It’s one of those things that, I understand why people think the price is amazing but I don’t think the limitations make it a fair comparison against most other products on the market (which offer so much more than just accurate amp sounds).
I really like the warranty that first time purchasers get.
I like that it has a build quality almost of a Digitech RP1 from 30 years ago.
It was a good design choice to not include plate reverb. Plate reverb is for posers. Hall reverb all the way.
I like the fact that Megadeth uses it. If there's one band I think of for great and consistent tone, it's Megsdeth.
It fits neatly in the frunk of my Tesla model 3 base model that I financed on 8 year paper.
I like that it doubles as soil to grow entirely new forums of shitposting from.
It goes really well with my carbon fiber headless guitar that I play in my shoegaze/djent/deathcore/Taylor swiftcore band when my wife lets me play.
Okay! Let's do it! The positive QC thread. Where we only say things we like about it.
- I like that the low-end of the captures is more accurate to the real amp you capture than the Kemper was/is.
- I especially like that the captures are low CPU, so you can put a ton of them into a preset and use scenes to emulate a multi-channel amp.
- I like the walkthrough guide that they give you to tell you how to connect the thing up for capturing. Makes it super easy for people.
- I like the touchscreen! I do! Particularly for simple stuff like naming a preset.
- I like the footswitch+encoders. They work really well.
- I preferred the QC tuner to the Helix tuner. *ducks*
I feel the same way, so yes!I really like that I don't own one. Does that count?
Is this where all the Banned TGPers landed?
Hey my Tesla is a Model S P100D with Ludicrous Mode (0-60 in 2.3 seconds) & paid off...
I have several gas guzzlers @12 MPG & 9MPG... So not a tree hugger :)
But I do like my QC for my Modeling needs.
It's OK, you're allowed to write the name here. It's Headrush, isn't it!for a new popular modeling/capture device