ejecta
Roadie
- Messages
- 964
NoWait. Isn't this a contradiction?
NoWait. Isn't this a contradiction?
Post whatever you want; do not pile on. Contradiction.
Also take my opinions with a pound of MSG, I’m an amp guy and aside from dumb pod dablings over the years my first “legit” modeller is arriving tomorrow (HX stomp)
I would argue that you only need the screen if you allow routing. A screen version with routing I would expect to be $1K ish (not unlike FM3).i guess this is what we all wanted in our minds.
I think this is a great idea. As long as each FX slot can have any effect type in it and there are multiple variants of each type (ie reverb:hall, reverblate, etc). Wouldn't mind saying some EFX are pre only and some are post only and the "capture" is in the middle.
Correct. Post duly edited :)
How about this idea…. put him on ignore. Just a thought.
I just wish all these companies would make the very best device they can make, price the resulting unit how they need to and then let it fly.
Yes , IMO the build quality on that Nano is very highNRE's
Tooling up a new product of this type - enclosure, covers, buttons, caps, LED lenses, packaging and insert dies, label dies, artwork, etc. - is $200K+ easy.
Add in the up front labor and materials costs for engineering, prototypes, marketing, promotions, etc.
What's the net profit on each unit? How many you gotta sell just to break even on NRE's?
Can you keep the lights on during all of that while you wait for profits to start rolling in?
I just wish all these companies
Yeah, that's not how any of that works.Line6/Yamaha is the one who could pull it off with no up front costs except overhead.
Ex. tooling is $100K and the factory price for the unit to L6 is $100.
L6 places a binding PO for 5 releases of 500 units over a 6 month period at a unit price of $140.
Once that PO is fulfilled the unit price drops back to $100.
I'm sure Yamaha's word with Asian factories is gold.
Yeah, that's not how any of that works.
It's not the amortization, it's how you claim amortization is applied. There's no "Oh! Tooling's paid for! Our cost is suddenly less!" just like there's no "Oh! R&D's paid for! Our cost is suddenly less!"Too bad you're unaware of amortizing tooling over piece price.
That's exactly how it works in a lot of cases.
I've been personally involved dozens of times with folks like JBL Pro, Klipsch, Peavey, Harmon Consumer, and others.
Just assumed Yamaha had introduced L6 purchasing to the practice.
It's hard for small companies because it involves a lot of built in trust regarding production purchase orders.
The Top 3 Benefits of Tooling Cost Amortization
Worried about balancing tooling costs? See what cost amortization can do for your bottom line.www.hynesindustries.com
I was a Klipsch Reference dealer for over a decade. Good shit.Klipsch
It's not the amortization, it's how you claim amortization is applied. There's no "Oh! Tooling's paid for! Our cost is suddenly less!" just like there's no "Oh! R&D's paid for! Our cost is suddenly less!"
Happy to host a chat on my Youtube channel, but we'd have to order in some sort of teledildonic accoutrements I feel, @Achilles can't live without them!Happy to discuss further, but not in this thread.
I was a Klipsch Reference dealer for over a decade. Good shit.
About 1998 through 2008. We mainly sold the higher end stuff like the Reference and the in-wall and in-ceiling stuff.Which decade? These days it's quite a bit of crap unfortunately.