- Messages
- 2,173
Something efficient (clean).That's what I was thinking, too. Something clean and high wattage. Maybe some EVs?
Something efficient (clean).That's what I was thinking, too. Something clean and high wattage. Maybe some EVs?
Ed was not classically trained, like Randy.simply something that guys like Eddie Van Halen were NOT doing
There’s plenty of recordings made before Randy Rhodes that sound great, and plenty of current stuff that isn’t gridded that’s also great. Being gridded generally sucks, all the interesting stuff happens in the grey areas between (same with tuning). And just as with tuning, it can played tastefully or it can sound bad.Meh. I’d rather listen to a rushing Randy Rhoads track than any current “tidyed up” recording.
Over-tidying and “the grid” is part of what has killed rock’n’roll, in my opinion.
Ed was not classically trained, like Randy.
EVH struggled in improvisational situations, when he was unfamiliar with the song he was to play over.
There’s plenty of recordings made before Randy Rhodes that sound great, and plenty of current stuff that isn’t gridded that’s also great. Being gridded generally sucks, all the interesting stuff happens in the grey areas between (same with tuning). And just as with tuning, it can played tastefully or it can sound bad.
Randy Rhodes gridded would suck too, but if it was grooving in a pocket I’d find it way better than racing ahead of everyone else. Perfectly happy to accept some people might like (or not be bothered by) that sound. Just sounds bad to me, and makes me enjoy his playing less.
That's the thing though- it's Rock-n-Roll. It's not Classical where perfection is part of the genre. It's wild, with reckless abandon.probably taking a dump on a few peoples cornflakes here, but I listened to some RR era Ozzy the other week for the first time since I was a teenager.
Was really surprised at how much I couldn’t tolerate the sloppy timing - so much stuff is rushing ahead of the beat and coming in early, and it gives a kind of anxious/rushed feel. I know some people will say “oh that’s part of his sound, embrace it”, but after years of tidying up sloppy guitarists in the studio, I just couldn’t stomach this. Maybe in part to how the band was assembled at the time.
Not saying he can’t play by any stretch, he was obviously a monster guitarist with an amazing style. But I wish he had his ass kicked in the studio, or at the very least, just delaying the guitars a few ms.
Ed was terrified of double-tracking his guitar parts (or even doing overdubs) in the early day while in the studio.No disrespect, but I don't think that had any thing to do with that.
Meh. I’d rather listen to a rushing Randy Rhoads track than any current “tidyed up” recording.
Over-tidying and “the grid” is part of what has killed rock’n’roll, in my opinion.
Ed was terrified of double-tracking his guitar parts (or even doing overdubs) in the early day while in the studio.
He insisted to Donn and Ted that they allow them to "just play live" like they do on stage and record them that way.
Randy was a master at it.
It was all Sharon's fault.I can only imagine the effort he put into it. With Pro Tools triple-tracking is a lot
easier. Tell me other guitarists who were doing that back in the day like he was??
It was innovative. Full stop.
I just don't hear him receive the credit for his production choices and how he went
about recording, layering, and arranging the guitars. It was nothing short of brilliant.
And please no one come in and Max Norman me. Max had the freedom to do it
because of who Randy was. Not like Max had an history with that kind of approach
with a wide range of players after Randy.
Rhoadsprobably taking a dump on a few peoples cornflakes here, but I listened to some RR era Ozzy the other week for the first time since I was a teenager.
Was really surprised at how much I couldn’t tolerate the sloppy timing - so much stuff is rushing ahead of the beat and coming in early, and it gives a kind of anxious/rushed feel. I know some people will say “oh that’s part of his sound, embrace it”, but after years of tidying up sloppy guitarists in the studio, I just couldn’t stomach this. Maybe in part to how the band was assembled at the time.
Not saying he can’t play by any stretch, he was obviously a monster guitarist with an amazing style. But I wish he had his ass kicked in the studio, or at the very least, just delaying the guitars a few ms.
I wouldn’t equate playing behind the beat a bit to being gridded. There’s tons of rock n roll that’s played in the pocket and punches hard and tight as a result. And wild/chaotic music can still sound that way if it’s not rushing ahead.That's the thing though- it's Rock-n-Roll. It's not Classical where perfection is part of the genre. It's wild, with reckless abandon.
And I'm much more in the camp of playing accurately, personally, but with rock guitar, it's whatever goes for that player's style.
I really, really appreciate the effort and practice it takes for a player to play a certain # of notes exactly timed to a certain # of beats, especially if that player can also weave in and out of time at will, more than the ones who just go for it, can play fast, and come up with great licks. But I'd never take anything away from guys who just didn't bother getting their timing aligned to a grid either.
I’m sure RR would have been perfectly capable of tighter takes, I just don’t think what they decided to run with sounded very good. History tells me I’m in the wrong, his legacy is more than cemented.I can only imagine the effort he put into it. With Pro Tools triple-tracking is a lot
easier. Tell me other guitarists who were doing that back in the day like he was??
It was innovative. Full stop.