- Messages
- 14,768
Shielded
for
your
recording
pleasure
Fast charging for your wife's vibrator. I mean, cellphone.
Shielded
for
your
recording
pleasure
I am not an acolyte. Yet! Not trying to sell a particular view. Just super curious.
Hmmmm..... interesting conclusions. Time-stamped. I wonder if the naysayers will even watch this,
or are you all just ready to admit defeat now??
For the sake of clarification, It’s not the usb cable but the generation of USB technology that dictates speed, bandwidth etc. For our audio purposes, I guess anything will suffice.Thanks, I know data transfer speeds can vary with different USB cables. I think most people have
experienced a "slow" charging USB Cable with their cellphones. Change the cable and suddenly
it is charging faster. Different cable = different result.
I also get people (some people) are saying that will be irrelevant related to sound, and the quality of
that sound as it is transmitted through a USB cable.
I can't help but wonder if it is like headroom in an amp, though. The more headroom a USB Cable has (faster
speeds and more bandwidth) then wouldn't it make sense that the signal would be cleaner and distort less??
Maybe that is a wonky analogy, but it does seem to be at least somewhat plausible. To me.
Charging is a case of negotiating a faster charging speed between devices and the weakest link - in this case the cable - will matter for this. I don't know what is the actual difference between cables that work and cables that don't, but it could be some electronics built into the cable itself rather than the cable quality.There are differences in transmission, capacitance, and conductivity with instrument cables. Is there
anything similar (albeit different) with USB cables??
I notice that this they either work or they don't work argument doesn't seem to apply when charging
a device. They can still work, but the device charges more slowly? Why is that? Are they somehow
breaking down and not transmitting as much voltage as they once did? If that is so, how would that
impact data transfer (aka audio)?
Did you watch the video above? That was done with multiple cables and the result was not completely null...Stop relying on YouTuber influencers, and find the truth by yourself
1 - Record something from the Axe-FX to the DAW using the expensive cable
2 - Reamp that recording through the Axe-FX without any FX (In block direct to Out block) using the cheap cable
3 - Compare both recordings.... your brain is probably cheating you here, so don't use you ears and move to step 4
4 - Reverse the phase of one of the tracks (all DAWs have one Phase Reverse button)
5 - Mix the two recordings
6 - If the result is a flat line, both tracks are identical
I just did it myself using the same USB cable and the result was not null. Therefore, the methodology is invalidDid you watch the video above? That was done with multiple cables and the result was not completely null...
I believe standard audio cable can perform better than USB cable in for audio recording.
Stop relying on YouTuber influencers, and find the truth by yourself
1 - Record something from the Axe-FX to the DAW using the expensive cable
2 - Reamp that recording through the Axe-FX without any FX (In block direct to Out block) using the cheap cable
3 - Compare both recordings.... your brain is probably cheating you here, so don't use you ears and move to step 4
4 - Reverse the phase of one of the tracks (all DAWs have one Phase Reverse button)
5 - Mix the two recordings
6 - If the result is a flat line, both tracks are identical
It's definitely interesting... I wonder if all the tracks were normalized for volume if there would actually be any difference?
In what possible way?I believe standard audio cable can perform better than USB cable in for audio recording.