“Correct technique “ is from classical playing and you simply won’t be able to play half the repertoire without it. It is different on electric as there is no conventional learning method and most people do it themselves. This is why the results are so different and people make unorthodox choices work. It’s a bit like musicians who don’t want to learn theory and still become good. I personally think we should learn the lessons of people who have studied this before. Imagine science if everyone insisted on figuring it all out for themselves. We would all still live in caves.
“Correct technique “ is from classical playing and you simply won’t be able to play half the repertoire without it. It is different on electric as there is no conventional learning method and most people do it themselves. This is why the results are so different and people make unorthodox choices work. It’s a bit like musicians who don’t want to learn theory and still become good. I personally think we should learn the lessons of people who have studied this before. Imagine science if everyone insisted on figuring it all out for themselves. We would all still live in caves.
Nope. In fact I'd argue the Strandberg neck profile is kinda like a typical classical's "U" profile taken to an extreme.I haven’t seen many thin classical necks*.
*if any.
That's what I'm talking about! As a kid I loved all the guys slinging their axes so low, but that just doesn't work for me. I can't play at all with a guitar worn like that, but many can kill it.Correct technique?
Technique is science, art is what you do with it.Science, sure. Art, no.
And I have never seen any thick ones ever.I haven’t seen many thin classical necks*.
*if any.
Sloppy playing.Correct technique?
Thanks, no idea how this got so OT.I endured these three pages to simply say, congrats on the new guitar.