This was posted over on "the other place"...
Thoughts? Propaganda? Or legit durable?
This was posted over on "the other place"...
Thoughts? Propaganda? Or legit durable?
Ooops...This was literally posted yesterday.
I also commented on the other place. That was me that said, "This thing is stronger than Doug."Ooops...
Good news!
QC released a new advertisement:
such a relief!
Good news!
QC released a new advertisement:
lol that was Jackson ampworks from UK I thinkThere's a amp builder who made a video of himself tossing a packaged amp out a 2nd story window, then plugging it in to show it still worked...
Now do the SLO and Dual RecDecided to throw the QC in the loop of the Axe 3, then run into the power amp and cab. Curious how the amps stack up.
They are super, super close. I compared a Matchless DC30, Deluxe Reverb, Plexi, and Friedman HBE. Minor sonic differences that generally go away with a slight gain adjustment. Both are really touch sensitive and clean up similarly. The Fractal may have a touch smoother sound with a little more mid presence and the QC may have a touch more low end and sometimes a little more air.
Easily the two closest modelers I've heard sonically.
Now do the SLO and Dual Rec
adjusting MV and finding similar impedance curves will get close. QC Rectifier seemed alright to me when comparing to my Rev GI have never liked Dual Recs, but these do sound a little different. I did the Red Modern in both boosted by an 808 model in each. The Fractal is a little tighter and cleaner with a little less mids and the QC is a little fatter and fuzzier with a little more mids. Similar with the SLO, the QC is a little fatter and warmer where the Fractal is tighter with a bit more presence.
Could you just put some compression in the lane and record direct without an amp (or even possibly cab) block? Add some reverb to taste?
Think of it the same as you would if you were plugging it into a mixer. Think of your QC as your mixing console instead of as an “amp”.
Listen to what you get and add things accordingly. Does it need some EQ tweaks? Compression? Reverb? Add what it seems to need to achieve the sound you’re looking for
If they do come out w QC mini or whatever and I picked one upI have never liked Dual Recs, but these do sound a little different. I did the Red Modern in both boosted by an 808 model in each. The Fractal is a little tighter and cleaner with a little less mids and the QC is a little fatter and fuzzier with a little more mids. Similar with the SLO, the QC is a little fatter and warmer where the Fractal is tighter with a bit more presence.
You know I only got around to finally setting up the acoustic on this today almost two months later but these tips work. The guitar works best with no amps or cabs added at all. Just a tiny bit of compression and some reverb along with some adjustments on built-in pre-amp on the guitar itself.
Apparently the SLO model in the QC is based on an older SLO (when Mike was building them) and the SLO-X is based on a newer BAD built SLO. Just what I read on either Discord, Unity or TGP... Can't say for sure. I have the SLO-X plug-in but no longer have the QC to see for myself.Anyone else compare the SLO to SLOX? I dropped the X on a bus that was using the SLO on a mix and it was… different. I tried to match all the IO and amp/pedal settings and the OG was moar betterer at a quick listen. Same stems and everything. I need to check the cab block to see if I altered that in the old one. I heard no meaningful different between the Plini and X versions but the SLO at least for the cleans (which is my favorite plug-in for cleans ) seems different. Maybe (likely) user error. I’ll give it a more proper go tomorrow.
The X lead channel sounds badass, but I didn’t do any comparisons for it.