NAM support announced by Fractal Audio

It seems that what Line 6 will be providing with Stadium is much more of an ecosystem around capturing, including cloud elements and offloading the capturing process etc, which makes using some sort of proprietary format (with NAM support?) make more sense. I'm guessing that Fractal will handle NAM loading more like they handle IRs, or maybe like how Genome handles loading NAM captures into their CODEX engine, so there's less / no need for that.
 
There is actually a LOT to improve on. That's why NAM is still under development.

NAM and others will forever be in development. As far as I'm concerned though - on the amp modeling front - there are many devices that get me to where I want to be TODAY.

However, what still doesn't work well is speaker modeling - I still have to use a guitar cab to get the appropriate tone and feel in parity to a physical amp.

Now, once I do use guitar cabs, I have ZERO complaints - so the amp modeling / profiling is great with today's state of the art. Cab models and IRs are also great. But somehow, when you plug into 'FRFR', it doesn't translate. So that's where i'd put R&D into personally.
 
White-box modeling will still be the primary focus. NAM will be included for those cases where a model isn't feasible. Just look at the wish-list section of our forums:
"I wish for a model of the Andromeda Magnetar 3200. There are only five known in existence and no schematic is available but I'm sure Fractal could make a model just by looking at a picture of the rear panel."
 
White-box modeling will still be the primary focus. NAM will be included for those cases where a model isn't feasible. Just look at the wish-list section of our forums:
"I wish for a model of the Andromeda Magnetar 3200. There are only five known in existence and no schematic is available but I'm sure Fractal could make a model just by looking at a picture of the rear panel."

Finally, I can have my never-before-modeled, near-vintage, last decade Bugera G5 Infinium head in Fractal.
 
Cab models and IRs are also great. But somehow, when you plug into 'FRFR', it doesn't translate. So that's where i'd put R&D into personally.

I agree that there is much more to be done with cab and speaker modeling, but there is a lot more than can be done with capture tech as well.
 
White-box modeling will still be the primary focus. NAM will be included for those cases where a model isn't feasible. Just look at the wish-list section of our forums:
"I wish for a model of the Andromeda Magnetar 3200. There are only five known in existence and no schematic is available but I'm sure Fractal could make a model just by looking at a picture of the rear panel."
This is verbatim what I hoped you would say.
 
White-box modeling will still be the primary focus. NAM will be included for those cases where a model isn't feasible. Just look at the wish-list section of our forums:
"I wish for a model of the Andromeda Magnetar 3200. There are only five known in existence and no schematic is available but I'm sure Fractal could make a model just by looking at a picture of the rear panel."
+1. I think the lesson of the QC is the two methods can be complementary.

NAM is making captures a commodity. The important part will be the bits around it, for example having a nice UI for navigating, auditioning, and loading the captures.
 
White-box modeling will still be the primary focus. NAM will be included for those cases where a model isn't feasible. Just look at the wish-list section of our forums:
"I wish for a model of the Andromeda Magnetar 3200. There are only five known in existence and no schematic is available but I'm sure Fractal could make a model just by looking at a picture of the rear panel."
Are you able to say if it will be "just" a NAM block or could you see the next gen being able to make use of I/O to create profiles to load in
 
NAM won't capture it randomly frying itself properly. At least not yet.

All the more reason for a model then, especially once everyone realizes that some famous stoner rock guitar sound was recorded from one right as it caught on fire. It's either that or we will all have to buy a solid state Bugera-in-a-box that uses CD4069s that blow up by design, Wasp-style.
 
@timbuck3 you should hold off from buying anything
stephen colbert oh no you didnt GIF
 
White-box modeling will still be the primary focus. NAM will be included for those cases where a model isn't feasible.

It's awesome to see you're considering NAM support for next Gen, and obviously it's also great that you'll still be fully focussing on your own component modelling work, I think there's room for both.

I'm here to help if you guys need anything, or sign-posting for a conversation with anyone (NAM / Tone3000). I help out with both on support, pre-release testing and moderation, so I'm all ears if you have any questions. =)
 
Back
Top