There's no mention of stereo at all on the product site for the 212 version. That's a bummer.
TBH, I thought the speaker was the weakest link on the Catalyst (especially for high gain) but other folks seem to like it. YMMV I guess.If it's anything like the speakers used in the Catalyst, those are reportedly quite flat by default.
The only issue is guitar speakers having a very limited frequency response range, rolling off at 5Khz or so - so they won't quite do the FRFR/PA thing.
I just want to know what "CL" stands for. Craigslist Edition™?
I’ve mentioned this before but cranked, I added an EQ pedal in the loop to reduce the harsher frequencies.The Cat 60 speaker was pretty decent. I think I swapped it for a Celestion V Type and noticed very little difference if any. I never cranked it up though. I could see a pair of Cat 60's being a relatively inexpensive stereo amplification for a modeler.
I was thinking more that L6 got a really good deal on parts and this is what could be made from them, lol.To me this seems like Line6 saw that some modeler users were pretty pleased with the Line6 Catalyst amps to power their modelers on stage, and chose to make a product for those folks.
So this is like combining the tech of the Catalyst with the speaker emulation of the Powercab. In fact, I expect this is mostly the same hardware as the Catalyst. The traditional enclosure should help it sound more like a good old open back 1x12 compared to the more PA box style original Powercab.
Do we think the price increase over the Catalyst is just about inflation and a smaller market for the product?
Wonder how a Powercab would sound with a Red Back or EV?Well i'm a moron, i was looking at the comparison grid for the original Powercabsand their 70Hz - 20kHz frequency response.
Anyway, if these were available back then, i'd probably would have gotten a powered cab with a real speaker instead of a FRFR.
If they're anything like the OG Powercabs, i expect the build quality to be much better than Catalysts.