The new Agoura modelling seems to be much further away than what the previous gen was. I'm perfectly used to having to adjust for tolerances and different impedance curves and things and it seems to be way beyond that. And IMO there was room for improvement before but this is vastly different.
This kind of preference is a subjective thing. If there are clear differences, that suggests something has gone wrong somewhere - imagine Cliff released a new Fractal update tomorrow and things changed as drastically as these HX vs Agoura differences. It would be a bit confusing if we already know the existing models are very close. The EVH was only modelled recently on Helix so I doubt that anything could have slipped through the net - should the differences not be fairly minor?
Having a preference is fine, and I totally accept that Stadium feels better to play. I'm trying to remove my own tonal preferences from the equation and am focusing more on:
- why is there such a big difference between Agoura and the previous modelling? Either they should both be somewhat close, or one has a problem. Matching the tones and settings closely suggests the old model was pretty good.
- why is it almost effortless to make HX Native sound close to the real amp, while Agoura is almost impossible to get as close? Even if we factor in improved modelling, different tolerance modelling (even though the reference amp is the same), different impedance curves, it's still not possible to make the Agoura model sound like the amp.