Richard_G
Roadie
- Messages
- 699
Thanks for posting these, @Karl Houseknecht, this was very interesting!
They were very closeA = Agoura
B = Fractal
I didn’t go to any special trouble to match these other than using the same settings and then trying to match levels. Imagine what someone with better ears for that could do.
I had the same results with the 2203, EVH, Revv, and Ecstasy. The AC30 is more different because they are different amps but it is still close. This amp is particularly eyebrow raising because Fractal is known for / prides themselves on their accuracy of the Mark models.
My main point here is anyone claiming “light years” of difference in the modeling quality between the platforms is listening with their eyes. And even I fully expected Fractal to still have an edge. If they do, it’s not something I can quantify.
What are you hearing there?the only amp that may have something odd now Is the 5153
Again , I am only judging a clip but there seemed to be some discrepancy vs Dead pan real amp and the StadiumWhat are you hearing there?
I like the Stadium better here too. IRL; I got some OK results but greatly preferred the FAS stuff. And again; if I have to use extreme settings to get the results I want; that seems like a step backwards.Credit to @MirrorProfiles for the DI:
AM4:
Dropbox
www.dropbox.com
Stadium
Dropbox
www.dropbox.com
Both 2C+ with Miko plugin (same cab settings).
My first time successfully reamping (ever) but I'm worried I did it wrong given how different the amps sound. However, it was done over USB for both the stadium and AM so leveling should be correct? Anyway, I got some FOMO on the 1.2 update so I am borrowing a friends to make sure I'm not a dumbass and buy another stadiumhonestly, I think I prefer the Stadium here but it doesn't really have the dryness of the AM....which I personally associate with the Mark series.
Although @Karl Houseknecht used the same exact settings on both.I like the Stadium better here too. IRL; I got some OK results but greatly preferred the FAS stuff. And again; if I have to use extreme settings to get the results I want; that seems like a step backwards.
My point was I'm never setting the presence on .6. Ever. I know you need to listen with your ears and not your eyes but if I dialed the real amp in; the presence is going up just because that's the way I dial it in. This just takes me back to the "Set the master on .5 and you're set!"Although @Karl used the same exact settings on both.

On real Marks I never set the presence high. I guess it just depends on what you want to hear. I think of it as a way to add top end sheen, but only if called for.My point was I'm never setting the presence on .6. Ever. I know you need to listen with your ears and not your eyes but if I dialed the real amp in; the presence is going up just because that's the way I dial it in.
They were very close
It sounds like the only amp that may have something odd now Is the 5153
And maybe Jubilee
But the Mark 2 , XTC, 800, Revv, SLO
They seem to have nailed pretty good
I think my ears are blown out so that might explain itOn real Marks I never set the presence high. I guess it just depends on what you want to hear. I think of it as a way to add top end sheen, but only if called for.

I believe I disabled the GEQ and Minotaur block on this reamp but this is whereI landed with my IIC Stadium amp block.I think my ears are blown out so that might explain it![]()
Here's my entrance into the reamp wars. I just did the IIC on the Stadium. I used my favorite HX Mandarin 2x12 V30 cab. DI by LTI believe I disabled the GEQ and Minotaur block on this reamp but this is whereI landed with my IIC Stadium amp block.
There's some weirdness happening there. Extreme upper high end static or clipping. I'm not going to say the name of the rodent because I don't think it's that and I don't hear it in the model when I play it. But that's what it reminds me of.