Kemper Profiler MK 2

The effect that has on feel is good to some people. That’s why old classic rack fx are still in use and con sound better even if not accurate.
 
2. Many people tried Kempers when they came out around 2012. But profiles and effects weren’t as good back then as they are today. There have been significant improvements in (Liquid) profiling, the internal effects and the quality of commercial profiles, but if you made up your mind over ten years ago, it’s gonna be hard to change that without the first hand experience
There was the aliasing fix and a fix for bass end. But some wanted more upgrades in the core accuracy of profiling, which remained unchanged aside from the early bass end fix.

But here we are with mkII :) At least the EQ match portion of profiling seems improved.
 
There was the aliasing fix and a fix for bass end. But some wanted more upgrades in the core accuracy of profiling, which remained unchanged aside from the early bass end fix.

But here we are with mkII :) At least the EQ match portion of profiling seems improved.
The aliasing fix wasn't good enough, unfortunately.
 
The aliasing fix wasn't good enough, unfortunately.
The profiles you liked must of really had issues because it doesn’t bother me that much. I like the way it sounds and feels. I do use it a lower volume and I don’t use IRs with it so that is probably making a difference.
 
There probably aren't a lot of people upgrading their Player to level 3. That's why Kemper shuffled the features around.

They are selling a lot of Players though. For $700 it may not match the HX Stomp feature for feature, but it gives people who have always wanted a Kemper, but who use a pedal board, a small pedal they can put on their board alongside their favorite pedals. There are a lot of people out there who fit that description.
 
Joker GIF by Better Call Saul

I am not sure I can explain accurately in a few words but aliasing is basically high frequency reflections that shouldn't be there. It is mostly at a much lower level than the main signal and at frequencies few if any of us can hear, but it looks really bad on a graph if you make the graphs to look really bad and then you can make YouTube videos and forum posts bashing various products for their bad aliasing.

In some cases it is audible and then it should be addressed, but it has been blown WAY WAY out of proportion online these days.

You may find videos like this educational:



Edit: Start at 7:50 if you're in a hurry, but I think the whole video is worth watching.


Not bueno. Short story the way I understand it is artifacts introduced in to the signal.

Thanks for the explanations! And that video was great.
 
Which 3 button device are you referring to? You lost me there LOL. Just curious, not disagreeing with anything. A Stomp maybe?
Mostly, I am referring to the $700 and up devices. That just seems silly steep for a 3 button device.... many times with limited functionality compared to its big brother. But then, take it with a grain of salt as I only use my device for gigging so my take on what is "mandatory" is slanted.
I think there are two main reasons people like to diss Kemper (and actually I was one of them until I got my Stage):
1. Kemper was the first to profile amps and actually make famous pros ditch their amps live. There is the common theme of „amp sounds better than profiler“ which is glued to the Kemper product.
2. Many people tried Kempers when they came out around 2012. But profiles and effects weren’t as good back then as they are today. There have been significant improvements in (Liquid) profiling, the internal effects and the quality of commercial profiles, but if you made up your mind over ten years ago, it’s gonna be hard to change that without the first hand experience
That's fair. I think it is also true that better capture devices have come out over time and despite my distain for the heavy use of a Null test to determine the value of one device over another, there are many who buy into this idea.

When the Axe III Fx first came out, a buddy of mine in another band got one of the first ones off the boat. Me, him, and a friend with a Mesa Dual Rectifier spent 12 hours one day swapping guitars, cabs, speakers, and modelers/amps. There was no one that walked away that day thinking that any of the 3 rigs were "substandard"; however, the Kemper took the day as the best overall in its ability to quickly be tweaked into a great sounding rig. We ran the gambit from various types of clean sounds, to low gain slight breakup, to classic rock distortions to outright metal sounds as well as trying to achieve various effects. All 3 were quite good (the mesa of course had a pedal board to go with it). At the end of the day, no one thought that any of the 3 were unworthy of a good gig rig.
I've personally never played through one, but I also don't doubt it's capabilities to sound great because I've heard it do exactly that countless times since bands started using them live. I'm just not sold on the merits of selling an MK2 at that price for what it's actually offering.
The MK2 is selling at the same price as the MK1 was ($1400 Rack , $1500 Stage, $1800 toaster). I personally don't understand the toaster price at all compared to the other 2. You can get a package deal with the rack and foot controller for around $1800 .... which is my poison of choice since it is the best gig rig for a clean stage.

Since the Stadium isn't out yet, I see no reason for Kemper to lower their price just yet; however, I think it very possible they will after a while. Surely that didn't spend much on the MK2 development.

Do you believe that these prices are out of line for what you get compared to other devices on the market?
They are selling (a lot of) Level III Players which is about $1k.

My guess is more are via the slippery slope upgrade path.

It is a lot of money for limited I/O, no display (sheesh, there's a clear spot for a tiny one), no fx loop, etc. But it has pretty much everything else, the sounds are full blown great and the device is as powerful as the big units.

It occupies a unique place right now among very portable, full featured, "top tier" units. I was hoping Fractal, Line6, a nam player, or Neural would have a unit that worked better for me. Maybe 12-18 months.
Yea, I can't get my head around paying 1K for something with 3 switches on it. I do wonder of the Stadium Stomp will be full featured or not. Certainly this has not been the case for the FM3 or the Helix Stomp today. It is only the case (mostly the case) with the Kemper Player.
The beauty of different opinions, I’m still happy with the KPP which lvl is literally half of an fm3t in Germany.

Heck even at lvl3 it’s still 450 less.

So now I couldn’t be arsed to go back to Fractal at EU prices.
This is where I am wondering how things work out in the market as well. Kemper at $700 offers more capabilities than any other 3 switch offering on the market as far as I know.
Noticeable or extreme aliasing - which is what the Kemper demonstrably has
Sounds good to a great many people. I hear nothing displeasing nor does anyone in the crowd. Plenty of A level touring acts are also feeling pretty good about their performances. It would certainly seem like such a glaring and horrible sounding piece of gear would have difficulty with this level of discerning musicians.
I'm guessing that will be the price for Helix Stadium Stomp.
I agree. Sadly, it just seems like the pricing KEEPS going up generation after generation.

I wonder if Kemper isn't going to end up as the value king in the live gig scene? If you want a full featured gig rig at half the price, you go Kemper?

I'm not sure how much room they have to reduce their pricing though. The metal case and process to put the thing together looks pretty labor intensive to me. Of course, that "built like a brick shit house" feel is comforting for people that gig a lot (or tour).
The profiles you liked must of really had issues because it doesn’t bother me that much. I like the way it sounds and feels. I do use it a lower volume and I don’t use IRs with it so that is probably making a difference.
Yea, my old Morgan AC20 rig (on my now outdated MK1 Rack) sounds just as glorious today as it did 10 years ago ;). I can love on that crappy old aliased sounding mess all day long ;). I did swap out the legacy reverb for the new natural verb engine ;). Aside from that ..... just glorious to my ears.
 
Sounds good to a great many people. I hear nothing displeasing nor does anyone in the crowd. Plenty of A level touring acts are also feeling pretty good about their performances. It would certainly seem like such a glaring and horrible sounding piece of gear would have difficulty with this level of discerning musicians.
I don't care. Aliasing is objectively present, in a way that it isn't for the Axe FX III or Helix.

You have lost this debate multiple times now, because I'm focusing on objective reality, and you're focusing on fallacious appeals to authority, and your feelings.
 
Back
Top