Kemper Profiler MK 2

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 490
  • Start date Start date
Problem is, that's not the question YouTubers are looking to answer. It's always "X has lower delta loudness than Y, so it's clearly a more accurate capture."
Yes and doing so with completely different stimulus signals across various videos, but presenting the LUFS value as an absolute value for comparison across various videos and tests .

Has Leo described how he achieves alignment between tracks for his null tests? That part is very important in null tests (and part of the reason null tests are to be taken with a grain of salt until that is disclosed).
 
Has Leo described how he achieves alignment between tracks for his null tests? That part is very important in null tests (and part of the reason null tests are to be taken with a grain of salt until that is disclosed).

IIRC, he said he uses correlation analysis to do the phase alignment, which is the right answer. However I don't recall if he has ever presented the details of exactly how he does it. As I mentioned earlier, IMHO, anybody who does a null test like this should provide abundant details about their methods.
 
Problem is, that's not the question YouTubers are looking to answer. It's always "X has lower delta loudness than Y, so it's clearly a more accurate capture."

Well, I think the question youtubers are looking to answer is "how do I get more clicks" ;). I was referring to someone who is sincerely trying to measure accuracy.
 
Back
Top