synthpenguin
Roadie
- Messages
- 747
Thread 'AM4 now available at shop.fractalaudio.com | Mar-30-2026' https://forum.fractalaudio.com/thre...-at-shop-fractalaudio-com-mar-30-2026.219891/
Got one!!
Thread 'AM4 now available at shop.fractalaudio.com | Mar-30-2026' https://forum.fractalaudio.com/thre...-at-shop-fractalaudio-com-mar-30-2026.219891/
Cool he is using new measuring techniques![]()
Axe-Fx III Firmware 32.03 Release
https://www.fractalaudio.com/downloads/firmware-presets/axe-fx-3/32p0/axefxiii_dsp_rel_32p03.zip Axe-Fx III Firmware Release Notes 32.03 Improved Chorus block. Remastered the Japan CE-2 model. Added EQ controls to some models. Added the following models: Japan CE-1 Chorus. Based on a Boss...forum.fractalaudio.com
Yeah - really sounds intriguing:Cool he is using new measuring techniques
I wonder if this is next gen behind the scenes
Starting to trickle down
W/o a doubt it has been so for quite a while, is my guess.I wonder if this is next gen behind the scenes
Starting to trickle down

I was joking just a little in my previous message, but I think Cliff's original epiphanies are probably "in higher resolution" -- to be pared down even to fit the III that soon may become a Game Boy too...Typically from what I've seen in Fractal-verse, I speculate the new generation of Fractal modelers will be a continuation of current gen and will start off from where the current AxeFxIII is.
When plugins and hardware look better they sound better, its a factTypically from what I've seen in Fractal-verse, I speculate the new generation of Fractal modelers will be a continuation of current gen and will start off from where the current AxeFxIII is. There will be an overlap of several months like the move from 2 to 3 was because development and refining the algorithms never stops. I also speculate a massive UI overhaul which work on has probably already began.
I love the Amp block improvements, especially when I don't hear of feel the difference anymore when directly comparing with my real amps which is already the case.
Fractals current gen is so good that in my opinion when their next gen arrives it will be a tough call for people to move to it unless it really is a game changer in terms of UI, Routing and Functionality. After all, it is just guitar gear, what more can you imagine you need?
You know what would be cool?
A 'Realistic/Visual' window in the Editor where I can open each block/channel and interact with the individual models like they were the real hardware similar to how VST plugins strive to look like. Yes it's only cosmetics but it does a lot to the perception of the modeler.
Expanding that thought, if Fractal only change the visual side of things like the Editor and UI they can easily put a 'IV' on it and everyone will buy it and be happy.
I'm not buying it really. When you compare a real amplifier under load to any of these platforms, the amp modellers are nearly always too polite, not snarly enough, not offensive enough, and not aggressive enough. They are very good, and Fractal is certainly at the top of the pack, but they're still not as good as a real amplifier.Typically from what I've seen in Fractal-verse, I speculate the new generation of Fractal modelers will be a continuation of current gen and will start off from where the current AxeFxIII is. There will be an overlap of several months like the move from 2 to 3 was because development and refining the algorithms never stops. I also speculate a massive UI overhaul which work on has probably already began.
I love the Amp block improvements, especially when I don't hear of feel the difference anymore when directly comparing with my real amps which is already the case.
Fractals current gen is so good that in my opinion when their next gen arrives it will be a tough call for people to move to it unless it really is a game changer in terms of UI, Routing and Functionality. After all, it is just guitar gear, what more can you imagine you need?
You know what would be cool?
A 'Realistic/Visual' window in the Editor where I can open each block/channel and interact with the individual models like they were the real hardware similar to how VST plugins strive to look like. Yes it's only cosmetics but it does a lot to the perception of the modeler.
Expanding that thought, if Fractal only change the visual side of things like the Editor and UI they can easily put a 'IV' on it and everyone will buy it and be happy.
Psycho-acoustically, it is actually true lolWhen plugins and hardware look better they sound better, its a fact
Could very well be, I mostly compare at very low master volume settings so the idiosyncrasies don't get to show up.I'm not buying it really. When you compare a real amplifier under load to any of these platforms, the amp modellers are nearly always too polite, not snarly enough, not offensive enough, and not aggressive enough. They are very good, and Fractal is certainly at the top of the pack, but they're still not as good as a real amplifier.
I think this sort of stuff is always very case by case.I'm not buying it really. When you compare a real amplifier under load to any of these platforms, the amp modellers are nearly always too polite, not snarly enough, not offensive enough, and not aggressive enough. They are very good, and Fractal is certainly at the top of the pack, but they're still not as good as a real amplifier.
Right... but connect your Mark V to a V30 load .... and then record it under a mic, or better yet by tapping the power-output of the amplifier with a high quality DI box like the Neve, and then try and get THAT sound purely on desktop without any tube poweramp involved... much bigger struggle.When I pipe my Mark V and the AM4 model through my Fryette PS-100 into real cabs at a reasonable loud volume, I can get them to sound and feel pretty darn identical.
Couldn't you just use the line-out from the amp? Or is the Neve more about you liking how that DI box sounds?Right... but connect your Mark V to a V30 load .... and then record it under a mic, or better yet by tapping the power-output of the amplifier with a high quality DI box like the Neve, and then try and get THAT sound purely on desktop without any tube poweramp involved... much bigger struggle.
And I'd argue that is the primary use case for modelling.
The Neve is transparent. Doesn't colour the tone. I can trust with the Neve that when I'm connecting the THRU to my real cab for the load, that the DI signal is getting a true cabless version of the amplifier in full.Couldn't you just use the line-out from the amp? Or is the Neve more about you liking how that DI box sounds?
I wonder if you could use e.g the Fractal mic preamp emulation to get something that tickles your fancy.
According to the Mark V schematic (which might not be entirely accurate), the Mark V 90 slave out is a very simple circuit so it should be about as transparent as it gets too.The Neve is transparent. Doesn't colour the tone. I can trust with the Neve that when I'm connecting the THRU to my real cab for the load, that the DI signal is getting a true cabless version of the amplifier in full.
I don't trust the line outs on most amps, and if I used the FX loop send as my signal, then I'm missing the gloriousness of the poweramp.
Using the Neve isn't an aestethic choice really. It is a technical one. It ensures that I'm getting the true reference signal.
A 25k volume box in parallel with the cab/load into a buffer then into a passive DI box will be the most 'invisible' to the amp, have the flatest response, maintain best impedance ratios and isolate grounds.Using the Neve isn't an aestethic choice really. It is a technical one. It ensures that I'm getting the true reference signal.