JiveTurkey
Goatlord
- Messages
- 19,706
Please god, noI am more interested in whose X Recto they modelled![]()

Please god, noI am more interested in whose X Recto they modelled![]()
That's interesting, thanks for sharing.No, the models don't have the same tone stacks.
However, our reference JVM410H has 47K resistors in series with the treble pots.
A JVM410HJS also has 47K resistors in series with the treble pots.
The question is whether our reference amp is incorrect or did Marshall start putting those resistors in there at some point. I suspect the latter.
One of the common complaints with the JVM410H is squealing when you turn the treble up. This is because the chassis is laid out incorrectly. The output transformer is on the wrong side and couples into the input stage.
I suspect Marshall changed the tone stack to reduce the crosstalk and address the squealing complaints.
Has the JVM had 47K in series with the treble pots in every release, or was this something that started after a certain point?
![]()
Marshall JVM410HJS - real amp versus Axe3
As well as feeling like the HJS model was dark sounding, I’ve always felt the same about the regular JVM. It’s typically an amp I think of as quite bright and almost twangy, and to get those kind of tones always took some work. The recent Bogren plugin immediately reminded me of the JVM tones...forum.fractalaudio.com
![]()
Marshall JVM410HJS - real amp versus Axe3
As well as feeling like the HJS model was dark sounding, I’ve always felt the same about the regular JVM. It’s typically an amp I think of as quite bright and almost twangy, and to get those kind of tones always took some work. The recent Bogren plugin immediately reminded me of the JVM tones...forum.fractalaudio.com
The treble pots are the fourth pots from the left. The circuitry around them is not visible.
The treble pots are the fourth pots from the left. The circuitry around them is not visible.
Even if this amp did not have the 47K resistors that's not enough evidence for me to change the models. We need information from Marshall as to when they incorporated this change and how many amps were made with it. The models need to reflect the majority of amps in the field.
Harsh, thin and noisy.
JVM has a 200k treble pot vs 250k on most others.That's interesting, thanks for sharing.
Can we just choose the JCM800 tonestack to have the "standard" response from the JVM410 model?
the designer of the amp say it shouldn’t have 47k (who has worked at Marshall within the last 5 years)
You may have been saying that but others were arguing against my point. Which is not even in the post I was responding to when you made this comment. Accuracy in context is important.Weve been saying exactly this since the start of this accuracy argument
We aren't getting anywhere with this endless circle. We've moved on to hopefully getting the JVM to be accurate and seem to be making progress.You may have been saying that but others were arguing against my point. Which is not even in the post I was responding to when you made this comment. Accuracy in context is important.
Yeah, via PM.Oh cool. I couldn't tell that from what I read. Was this in a private message?
Thanks for the response. I just don’t appreciate my point being reduced to what you posted about it. It wasn’t accurate. So I replied. Hopefully that won’t be needed again. It would really help if people did not mischaracterize what I say.We aren't getting anywhere with this endless circle. We've moved on to hopefully getting the JVM to be accurate and seem to be making progress.
I know, we all know, you are saying there should be two options (a cliff version and the real version). Sure sounds great, but the fractal was made to recreate digital amps as close as possible to the real thing. It's in their description of the unit, it's been made a point endless amounts of times here and on the FAS forum about how accurate it is to amps to the point where people sell the real thing "because it's so close". Imo accuracy should be the #1 priority and idk if it's even an opinion. It's quite literally in their product description.
Again, totally cool you want a Cliff version option but as others have stated I think that would take more time than you realize and to me that should only come after all the amps are as accurate as possible. Nobody is getting upset or digging there heels in. We are just asking for the fractal to do what it does best, emulate analog gear accurately.
Aye, Ed and I are real people.Ah I didn't realize you were outside the US. Yeah forget that lol