Just for my own fun I made a Quad Cortex capture of the NAM profile ( DI RECTO) you made and shared @MirrorProfiles
1: I used your Gitar DI to reamp the NAM profile I made a capture of and used a QC cab block
2: Your real Recto AMP DI, reamped with the same QC cab block
My capture of the real amp NAM file, is missing a bit of omff in the low end, but the hi end is there I think. I wonder if things would be more real sounding if we could capture the real amp, and not use a NAM proflie to make a QC capture..that was a mouthful...lol
I never got along with Rectos as much as I tried, but I should spend some time with the models.
Absolutely love the constructive discussions here.
will definitely try this. Feel like I’ll be better off using some signal generators for this one so I’ll need enough time to get things set up. Maybe Sunday I’ll be able to do this.@MirrorProfiles if you match the knobs on the model to the amp by eye, can you tune the SIC by ear to dial out the flub with low Freq and dial in the right top end with high Freq?
even if model master is on 0.1 there's still way too much low end parasitics going on, that's what's happening to the top end, on the amp MV it's on a gradient, with the model MV it's always on. If you reduce low res freq the top end is kinda there.
idk if it's the model MV bright cap that's missing from the equation. even with master on 0.1 the low end resonance is so overwhelmingly prominent to smear the top end, the amp isn't like that with MV really low. the top end doesn't squish down until the MV starts to compress. the only way reduce it in the model is reduce SIC low res or turn down/off screen Freq and Q.
Just for my own fun I made a Quad Cortex capture of the NAM profile ( DI RECTO) you made and shared @MirrorProfiles
1: I used your Gitar DI to reamp the NAM profile I made a capture of and used a QC cab block
2: Your real Recto AMP DI, reamped with the same QC cab block
My capture of the real amp NAM file, is missing a bit of omff in the low end, but the hi end is there I think. I wonder if things would be more real sounding if we could capture the real amp, and not use a NAM proflie to make a QC capture..that was a mouthful...lol
Real 1994 Dual Rectifier with Mesa OS 4x12. This used to be mine.
I sold it to a friend and got a recording of it today.
Edited to say, the strings on his guitar were as dead as doornails.
Real 1994 Dual Rectifier with Mesa OS 4x12. This used to be mine.
I sold it to a friend and got a recording of it today.
Edited to say, the strings on his guitar were as dead as doornails.
Real 1994 Dual Rectifier with Mesa OS 4x12. This used to be mine.
I sold it to a friend and got a recording of it today.
Edited to say, the strings on his guitar were as dead as doornails.
Team 10A here for sure, genuinely think that'll be a nice one to have corrected.
This one is in the 2600 range. He bought the armored cab I used to record this. I am not sure of it's year.love it, such a distinctive recto tone. Do you know what the serial no. is? Mine is low 5000’s, guessing they could be similar? What year is the cab from?
I’ll also try and mic things this weekend, will be cool to explore the speaker controls a bit more
Thank you, sir!Crushing!
Thank you!dead strings, nothing. that sounds great.
<-- Non Owner.
Authentic Mark GEQ slider tapers, when?
They are very similar in response.Like which Mark 5 Band Mark would you model, Mark IV? I guess, maybe?
Tbf, this 20A pot is just a genuine mistake rather than an idealized improvement. 10A is both more useful, and more accurate.
<-- Non Owner.
Authentic Mark GEQ slider tapers, when?
Dual Recto Red Modern:
Bass - noon
Mid - 2 o'clock
Treble - 2 o'clock
Gain - 2 o'clock
Master - 9 o'clock
Presence - 3 o'clock
FX Loop Bypassed
Bold
Diode
Load - Egnater Tourmaster 4x12 V30 16ohms