" A.I IR's " .... todays installment of better-IR Tech .... brought to you by ...

[ian_dissonance]

Absolute this video. Nothing AI about it at all.

That’s most things marketed as AI right now.

 

[Lysander]

Jesus H Christ on a basket, this guy just cannot stop grifting, can he.

 

[timbuck3]

doesnt hurt to try the free ones

 

[ejecta]

They don’t sound that great imho

 

[Desertdweller]

Yep .... in short ... its normal static IR's with [supposedly] " A.I. " generated EQ Curves applied to them ... as best as I can tell.

You know what's crazy? Most people dont realize you can add an EQ curve to any IR in any DAW and save it as a new IR. It's as easy as EQing and saving a guitar track.

 

[2112]

You don't need machine learning to do convolution

 

[quadgear]

You don't need machine learning to do convolution

And the converse is (typically) true.

 

[Alex Kenivel]

doesnt hurt to try the free ones

Sig line material

 

[[Nathan]]

You don't need machine learning to do convolution

Skynet agrees

 

[Jarick]

Didn't watch the whole video but my impression was that he just asked Chat GPT or whatever to suggest EQ settings, then baked those into the IR's.

 

[laxu]

Didn't watch the whole video but my impression was that he just asked Chat GPT or whatever to suggest EQ settings, then baked those into the IR's.

Basically it seems like combining what he prefers for EQ, what is used as recording tricks and what Chat GPT recommended.

So it's straight up bullshit to call these AI because there's no machine learning component in the actual processing to create these IRs.

Now, you could probably feed a dataset of tons of IRs to a ML framework and get something that is capable of making "AI IRs" but it also seems like a pretty pointless thing to do when it won't offer you anything you can't achieve with convolution methods.

 

[MirrorProfiles]

chat GPT for imaginary EQ settings?

Swear thats just click bait to wind people up.

the sooner people stop treating audio like there is some kind of video game cheat code, the better everyones tones will be.

 

[Jarick]

Basically it seems like combining what he prefers for EQ, what is used as recording tricks and what Chat GPT recommended.

So it's straight up bullshit to call these AI because there's no machine learning component in the actual processing to create these IRs.

Now, you could probably feed a dataset of tons of IRs to a ML framework and get something that is capable of making "AI IRs" but it also seems like a pretty pointless thing to do when it won't offer you anything you can't achieve with convolution methods.

Yep. It's technically "AI" but has no practical benefit. If that's what is being done.

 

[ian_dissonance]

Admittedly just bounced around the video, but was he comparing stock HX single mic cabs to his “AI IRs”. What’s the over-under on these just being HX stock cabs with post EQ?

 

[JiveTurkey]

$99 starter price? Um...I am one of the few "defenders" of HW around here but uh; yeah...no.

 

[lolainnb]

HW sounds exactly like that guy who “audits” public servants. You know that dude that records video in the post office to uphold the constitution. Anyway. Yeah I’d rather listen to AI voice narrate his videos

 

[JiveTurkey]

HW sounds exactly like that guy who “audits” public servants. You know that dude that records video in the post office to uphold the constitution. Anyway. Yeah I’d rather listen to AI voice narrate his videos

My son introduced me to that guy's channel over the summer oddly enough. We sat and watched a bunch of his vids and watching him drove me ABSOLUTELY NUTS

 

[Orvillain]

 

[eon]

 

[MirrorProfiles]