80% of digital modellers & c buyers are bedroom players according to marketing researches

It's likely happening already, with anything copyright related being as muddy as it gets in Suno (et al) land.
I mean, you can just have Suno create a song (and by now the quality is almost release-ready) and claim it'd be your composition/production. Nobody would ever be able to really tell anymore.

Off topic but Suno is the best 10USD a month that I have spend in a long time, like all of us I have so many lyrics, riffs, half songs etc. I've been doing covers of those ideas and I've been able to finish tons of those songs, I'm having so much fun!

This is one of the first tests I did with a old riff I had:
 
Off topic but Suno is the best 10USD a month that I have spend in a long time, like all of us I have so many lyrics, riffs, half songs etc. I've been doing covers of those ideas and I've been able to finish tons of those songs, I'm having so much fun!

This is one of the first tests I did with a old riff I had:
How much of that did you record?
 
How much of that did you record?

Nothing, I uploaded a mp3 of me playing the intro riff and i did the AI prompt "metal, progressive metal, jazz, alternative, melodic, pop, alternative metal, electronic, r&b, Latin" and pasted the raw text from Wikipedia and Suno AI created everything else. I did what they call "Cover" of the mp3 i uploaded.
 
I agree, just write your own music. You're not actually writing anything if AI records, arranges and fills in the gaps. It's like writing a foreword to a book instead of writing the book.
People are doing that and self-publishing. It’s insane. Having an idea for art is not that same thing and making art. Especially when you’re feeding that idea to something that leeches of actual human-made art.
 
People are doing that and self-publishing. It’s insane. Having an idea for art is not that same thing and making art. Especially when you’re feeding that idea to something that leeches of actual human-made art.
It is getting out of hand. I'm guilty of using ai thumbnail art when I post a song to soundcloud, but I think it's time to move on from all that and replace them.
 
Fwiw, I think it's sort fine to use AI with "decency". This includes some things, such as being honest to yourself (which requires a bit of selfawareness in the first place), such as being honest to whomever you present your AI-aquired "things" (regardless whether it's art, knowledge or whatever), such as not going all in just because you can, etc.

In case of Suno, if it gives you ideas, that's fine in my book. If it helps you with one or the other part (which is now easily possible as Suno Studio has just been released), that's sort of fine, too. But IMO that's almost where it ends already, in case you want to save a bit of "musical dignity".

Personally, I'm sometimes using Chat GPT, Perplexity or Gemini instead of Google, simply because it's often more exact. For instance, I needed to patch my SUP and was looking for the right glue. Google had no proper answers (at least nothing that could be found quickly) but Chat GPT had, simply because it would do a combined search based on various informations (size of damage, brand of SUP).
So that's just fine because CGPT was actually *helping* me to get something done myself.
If I however would ask it to create some song lyrics for me (something lots of folks are doing by now already), that'd not exactly help me in becoming a better songwriter. Asking for, say, a clever rhyme however is fine in my book - as it's helping and possibly even inspiring.

And yes, there's a fine line between using and abusing things. Or lots of fine lines.
 
I’m not saying I wouldn’t be curious to hear what AI can do with a riff or chord progression I wrote, but there’s no way I am feeding AI my musical ideas.

Right, Over the years I have some songwriting credits in commercially distributed records and I wonder if some of those songs were use to train these models? That I’m now using.

I’m an old fart with no desire to travel and perform again in public, it is a different situation for me to upload files that have been on my hard drive forever. But I understand the validity of questioning the morality and disruptive nature of AI in the arts.
 
It is getting out of hand. I'm guilty of using ai thumbnail art when I post a song to soundcloud, but I think it's time to move on from all that and replace them.
Ok, a man of my word... I deleted all the AI thumbnails. :LOL:
clean GIF
 
Fwiw, I think it's sort fine to use AI with "decency". This includes some things, such as being honest to yourself (which requires a bit of selfawareness in the first place), such as being honest to whomever you present your AI-aquired "things" (regardless whether it's art, knowledge or whatever), such as not going all in just because you can, etc.

In case of Suno, if it gives you ideas, that's fine in my book. If it helps you with one or the other part (which is now easily possible as Suno Studio has just been released), that's sort of fine, too. But IMO that's almost where it ends already, in case you want to save a bit of "musical dignity".

Personally, I'm sometimes using Chat GPT, Perplexity or Gemini instead of Google, simply because it's often more exact. For instance, I needed to patch my SUP and was looking for the right glue. Google had no proper answers (at least nothing that could be found quickly) but Chat GPT had, simply because it would do a combined search based on various informations (size of damage, brand of SUP).
So that's just fine because CGPT was actually *helping* me to get something done myself.
If I however would ask it to create some song lyrics for me (something lots of folks are doing by now already), that'd not exactly help me in becoming a better songwriter. Asking for, say, a clever rhyme however is fine in my book - as it's helping and possibly even inspiring.

And yes, there's a fine line between using and abusing things. Or lots of fine lines.

Beware that AI often gives wrong but well written answers.

It happens all the time.
 
Lee Anderton's say that in this video towards the end, citing Neural marketing research data.



What you think about it?

I mean, 80% is A LOT. It's like bedroom players are guiding the market.

no shit. how many people do you see playing out? do you think all those companies could survive with just the pros? no chance.

hobby players keep this market alive.
 
Back
Top