The digital resurgence

[newpedals]

Hi!

It seems to me that older digital pedals and rack units are kinda trending. I saw an old rack unit going for lot of $$$ on a used marketplace.

Some observations:

1. People seem to love analog-voiced digital delays. Such people used to prefer analog delays earlier, which had BBD chips in them. While there are exceptions, the characteristic of such delays seems to be removal of highs, making it kind of sit unobtrusively in the mix. Analog delays suffered from issue of inability to handle gain sometimes. Analog-voiced digital delays don't have this issue. Many such pedals have looper and tap tempo modes, making it useful for practicing and sounding as similar to a recorded song as possible.

2. Some digital choruses seem to be less noisy than their analog counterparts.

3. Some people seem to prefer running digital phasers before the amp but after their dirt pedals. Although something analog like a Phase 90 is easier to tweak, some digital phasers can temporarily be used to sound like a wah making them more versatile.

 

[the swede]

Analog delays suffered from issue of inability to handle gain sometimes. Analog-voiced digital delays don't have this issue.

digital delays made to simulate analog delay sometimes actually simulate that “issue” to.
My Digitech Obscura is kinda an homage to different analog peculiarities. The degrade control there, changes different things depending on wich mode I chose. I mostly use it’s Lo-fi mode with tone backed off and degrade set to max, wich results in dark murky repeats that have texture (distortion maybe) to them.

Personally I like having one digital delay pedal with “analog” voicings or simulations. And one digital delay pedal that is pristine clean and basically repeats what’s feed into it. Both can then be used together for creative stuff.

 

[2112]

As an aside, there's a lot of variations in design & implementation with digital delays themselves.

Early digital delay line based delays (DDL's) employed analog feedback paths, filtering, emphasis/de-emphasis and companders to work around the limitations in analog/digital and digital/analog conversion. In turn they imparted unique sonic characteristics of their own. There's a a Strymon white paper worth reading here.

 

[gearJunkie]

I am still a huge fan of my Rocktron Intellifex and have a ridiculous ear-to-ear smile on my face when I fire it up in my Mesa Boogie Triaxis + 2:90 rig.

 

[the swede]

As an aside, there's a lot of variations in design & implementation with digital delays themselves.

Early digital delay line based delays (DDL's) employed analog feedback paths, filtering, emphasis/de-emphasis and companders to work around the limitations in analog/digital and digital/analog conversion. In turn they imparted unique sonic characteristics of their own. There's a a Strymon white paper worth reading here.

It’s interesting indeed. Many of the musicians I’m nerdy about specifically use the DD-3 “long chip” because of its artifacts or whatever it is.

 

[RGB]

Still using an Eleven Rack (with an IR loader for FOH) and still think it's great...I only use the Matchless patch, but it's a good one.

Just haven't found a compelling reason to upgrade, for my uses.

That Tone King Imperial preamp looks interesting though...

 

[newpedals]

It’s interesting indeed. Many of the musicians I’m nerdy about specifically use the DD-3 “long chip” because of its artifacts or whatever it is.

Boss DD-3 history – stinkfoot.se

stinkfoot.se

I have borrowed a DD-3 once, I don't remember the version. It's repeats did have kind of a low-fi quality, but my ears may have deceived me. It was simple and could be used when you needed a prominent delay.

 

[ChordInversion]

I never stopped liking basic digital pedals (though I certainly like analog ones as well). Groupthink is a plague.

 

[Blix]

I am still a huge fan of my Rocktron Intellifex and have a ridiculous ear-to-ear smile on my face when I fire it up in my Mesa Boogie Triaxis + 2:90 rig.
View attachment 43090

The Intellifex was a godsend back in the day when I was a broke 20-something, it was the only affordable multieffects unit that didn't ruin your base tone due to it being analog dry-through (as long as you kept Hush off).

 

[maguchi]

I got a analog one, but it gots tap tempo

 

[FuzzyAce]

I've never been that fussy about delay pedals. As long as it has a mix and preferably a tone control, it usually works for me. I really liked the L6 DL4 when it came out. Having the tape and analog options was cool, and they all sounded great imo.

 

[la szum]

I've never been that fussy about delay pedals. As long as it has a mix and preferably a tone control, it usually works for me. I really liked the L6 DL4 when it came out. Having the tape and analog options was cool, and they all sounded great imo.

Recording is one thing, and where the details matter. I have found my own persnickety ways
when playing live where often self-defeating. So much gets masked/lost in the mix. This
is especially the case with heavy-handed rooms where the room imparts its own character
to what you sound like to the audience.

 

[Funk Soul Brother]

As long as you don't sound like electrified cat, most audiences don't care...

If they feelz like dancin' + the singer is *hot*, they'll even overlook electrified cat sounds!

This is a scientifically proven fact...

 

[newpedals]

I got a analog one, but it gots tap tempo

View attachment 43162

I am guessing this is finctionally similar to carbon copy deluxe (with the dedicated tap tempo footswitch). However, CC Deluxe had received a somewhat lukewarm response according to some info I read online because the knobs reacted differently than the "regular" non-tap tempo carbon copy which people were used to.

Usually when an analog delay has a tap tempo function, it's digitally controlled by a processor. "Analog heart, Digital brain" kind of a deal.