laxu
Rock Star
- Messages
- 5,223
The VII has some sensible simplifications. The back panel is a lot more straightforward with options people are likely use, and MIDI for footswitching. Putting reverb controls in the front panel is nice.I still think the V is Randall/Mesa's peak. Not every band/artists last album was their best, right?
I also believe the VII is a Gibsonified Mesa with pared down features, in a smaller enclosure. It
just smells of someone along the way pinching pennies and then crunching numbers to see
how much could be saved on parts/assembly over the long-term to increase bottomline profitability.
I am not writing a Doctoral Thesis on it, though. Yet.
But at the same time I think they cut out other cool features like the 10W tube rectified mode, the Tweed variac power option, and especially the preset graphic EQ option. I think you also can't make channels completely ignore the graphic EQ because there's no separate "off" option like on the V, just footswitch vs on.
The V was more like several amps in one box, covering basically any style. The VII feels like it's more geared towards the rock/metal player like the JP2C. Which, to be fair, was probably the type of player most likely to buy the Mark series.
I feel like they could have done more on the VII to make it earn its "jumped a number" moniker. Keeping the larger chassis and having a dual graphic EQ ala JP2C would have been nice, and maybe better channel cloning.