Stuff

Shredder777 said:
I've been researching the Two Notes Opus and it looks like a really nice cab sim solution (with some extra preamps on the Cab M).

They have DynIRs which is a collection of IRs that enable you to position the mic(s) on the cab. Most of the latest software solutions like Amplitube/GuitarRig/etc have this concept.

Some of the hardware modelers have this implemented to varying degrees. I believe the Fractal do this (in software). The Tonemaster Pro does it (on device). And I'm certain there are IR collections that have multiple position captures that you can navigate with your scroll wheel to change mic position, so if your modeler doesn't have a built in dynamic IR solution, you can still hunt and peck navigate through them.

In YOUR experience, are dynamic IR solutions more better than individual IRs? The problem with dynamic IR libraries is that they don't seem to be compatible with one another.
Click to expand...
For me, yes. Instead of relying on someone else's idea of where mics should be placed, they can be easily moved and swapped. I mainly use ML Sound Lab MIKKO 2, which can export an IR in various formats for whatever cab setup you build. That's very handy as I can then take my favorite IRs and slap them on just about anything.

It's true that many have proprietary systems that don't work with anything else.

Shredder777 said:
Also, extra points for your opinion on tube amp simulation. Does simulated tube saturation work in a desirable way? A decade ago when I was recording with my iso cab, there was a sweet spot with the amp where it made it sound more alive, but if you went too far it lost headroom and could sound flubby. So there was a creative element of balancing amp's EQ, with the level of tube saturation, and the position of mics.
Click to expand...
I guess you mean poweramp simulation? Depends on what you are running into it. If it's a preamp only device, then yes you can benefit from poweramp simulation. It will sound alright without it, but I think it does elevate the sound. I have no idea how good the poweramp sim on the Two Notes is.

Shredder777 said:
Worth buying an Opus? Or is tube simulation/dynamic IRs just achieving the same thing that regular IRs have been doing for a decade?
Click to expand...
Movable mic cab sims produce a mixed IR, so they are the same deal. The value is in being able to build your own, but that might not be important if you love the way a particular IR vendor does their stuff.
 
I use both equally, for the most part. Those “movable mic” options are also just scrolling through a list but you’re scrolling via a little animated microphone.
 
Shredder777 said:
I've been researching the Two Notes Opus and it looks like a really nice cab sim solution (with some extra preamps on the Cab M).

They have DynIRs which is a collection of IRs that enable you to position the mic(s) on the cab. Most of the latest software solutions like Amplitube/GuitarRig/etc have this concept.

Some of the hardware modelers have this implemented to varying degrees. I believe the Fractal do this (in software). The Tonemaster Pro does it (on device). And I'm certain there are IR collections that have multiple position captures that you can navigate with your scroll wheel to change mic position, so if your modeler doesn't have a built in dynamic IR solution, you can still hunt and peck navigate through them.

In YOUR experience, are dynamic IR solutions more better than individual IRs? The problem with dynamic IR libraries is that they don't seem to be compatible with one another.

IOW does having something like a Two Notes Opus help your sound? Or do you just find a collection of IRs you like and load them into whatever you are using?

Also, extra points for your opinion on tube amp simulation. Does simulated tube saturation work in a desirable way? A decade ago when I was recording with my iso cab, there was a sweet spot with the amp where it made it sound more alive, but if you went too far it lost headroom and could sound flubby. So there was a creative element of balancing amp's EQ, with the level of tube saturation, and the position of mics.

Worth buying an Opus? Or is tube simulation/dynamic IRs just achieving the same thing that regular IRs have been doing for a decade?
Click to expand...
Fractal does it on unit, not just software editor.
 
I was never quite excited by the “moving mic” UX and much prefer the unfreedom of a fixed list. I never get why people think that an infinitely movable mic interface is “easier” and quicker for getting the cab tones you like vs. a short list of IRs that are pre-selected as sweet spots. I still have MIKKO2 because I love ML Sound Lab’s IR packs and wanted to see if I could get any more interesting sounds out of those same cab and speaker combinations, but I still run “traditional” IRs 99.99% of the time.
 
It depends on the cabs really. For me generally if I like the sound of a cab (like Dyna Cab or QC cabs) then I won't fuss with the settings much. Same with IR's, if it's a good sounding cab then I don't have to dig through a lot of the options in that IR pack.
 
The reason I made mine the way I do is I hate being locked into a handful of mic positions. Scrolling through a list of IR’s that change randomly is not a way I like to work. What works for one song is usually going to be off on another, so being able to tweak is really useful.

With speakers captured in full, you can adjust IR’s with some idea of how it’ll affect the sound. So even though you have way more IR’s it’s actually easier to find what you need.
 
I didn’t think I was going to use the DynaCabs in the Fractal much, but I haven’t loaded a single static IR since they were introduced and have zero intention/desire to do so. The IR search always took me the longest to sort out when dialing in a tone, now it’s one of the quickest and if you want to change it, you don’t have to go back and find the same pool of IR’s to get one similar-but-different, you just drag the mic over a pinch until you’re there.
 
I might be in the minority here but to be honest I prefer single IRs. Moving the mic position seamlessly is of course the more realistic and flexible way, but I tend to get lost in those unlimited options and actually prefer to have some limitations. But that‘s just me. I definitely understand why other people might prefer to be less limited.
 
I can navigate through big lists of IRs almost as quickly as I adjust things on a fancy DynIR interface (very misleading name anyway), so it's a pretty moot point for me.
 
Worth buying a CAB M, which I did 4 years ago. Worth every damn penny and then some - if you need a hardware speaker iR loader.

Dynamic / Static iRs are all the same to me. Don't give a fuck about virtually moving a mic around, but I can use it. I use whatever based on tonal quality.
 
As an in-between I would look at the Get Good Drums Contenders solution -Not movable but they sound good and you can dial in some variations if you want it brighter etc.
 
Shredder777 said:
IOW does having something like a Two Notes Opus help your sound? Or do you just find a collection of IRs you like and load them into whatever you are using?
Click to expand...

I think this comes down mostly to personal UI preferences.
I hate drop down menus, so I much prefer mucking around with sliders for "mic position" to change a preset that I juuuust don't like.
In the Two Notes ecosystem, those mic movements are not what you'd expect when you're used to moving real mics:
The proximity effects is a bit weird, loudness doesn't change and the phase relationship between the two mics don't change, which is a total mindchallenge for me, but hey.

So: Dynamic IRs is nothing like moving real mics.
You can get satisfying results either way, by browsing through lists or by moving sliders until you are satisfied.
Pick your preferred work flow and get on with it.
 
Last edited:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
Stuff
Replies
7
Views
621
laxu
laxu
S
Stuff
Replies
8
Views
2K
MirrorProfiles
MirrorProfiles
BahamaDada
Do you paint guitar stuff?
Replies
8
Views
797
FuzzyAce
FuzzyAce
S
Stuff
Replies
8
Views
172
Sleezy E
Sleezy E
S
Stuff
Replies
5
Views
84
eggpl@nt
eggpl@nt
Back
Top