Stuff

I would definitely look harder at Zoom if they didn’t do the switching setup like that. I always thought the G9.2TT was a cool design. I think they’re modeling us as good as anything (on some models, anyways) but there’s always some catch with the switching or programmability that doesn’t work for me.
 
Went back to the G11 to see if I can live with the extra latency
You need to somehow arrange a blind test with someone else switched things without you knowing what you're playing through.
Then report back on how hard you failed.

People playing gigs, concerts, making an actual living with more latency, and here he is with 5ms absolutely unplayable.
SMDH
 
You need to somehow arrange a blind test with someone else switched things without you knowing what you're playing through.
Then report back on how hard you failed.

While I would not bet on him to fail (I was into exploring latency for quite a while, did some kinda "tests" with mates and observed some really astonishing things), our good old Shredder right here seems to have little to zero technical background, resulting in him mixing things up all the time. Having said that, I'm pretty sure his main issues aren't latency related at all.
He will continue with all of it, though, so there.
 
Jesus. Im a software engineer and have been gear tweaking for 30 years. I make mistakes but also admit when i do. This is not a mistake.

And yet you still couldn't answer what would be the difference between processing based latency and distance based latency (which you claimed was an important difference).

Besides, you could just measure any overall latency values yourself. I'm doing this with any rig.
 
Psycho acoustics are involved.

No (at least not really).

I said the debate has been beaten to death and not worth rehashing.

No, that very aspect hasn't been beaten to death. Which you prove yourself (because otherwise your answers would be more profound).

But even if its the same thing, why would someone want that if they can feel it?

I would pretty much doubt it's latency that you feel.

But i need to learn how in daw.

It's trivial for a software engineer such as you.
 
I’m curious how you are able to tell which converters sound better when they are both running totally different algos. How are you able to isolate just the performance of the conversion?
 
Just when using the loop as 4cm without any effects. With G11 cannot hear any different in amp's tone. The GT100 has very slightest presence loss.

Also, the G11 has a fantastic headphone output, the GT100 is not so great.
How do you know that those aren’t caused by buffers, audio circuitry, impedance interactions etc? In fact, I’d hazard a guess that the presence loss is nothing at all to do with conversion.

Hearing differences in conversion isn’t straightforward even when things are properly isolated and tested, and listened to in a well treated studio. For guitar gear when the conversion isn’t the only variable, and everything else going on? Probably not hearing the contribution of the converters specifically.
 
Back
Top