paisleywookiee
Rock Star
- Messages
- 8,677
That's not a very valid comparison though, since modelers are aiming to emulate tube amps to begin with. Tube amps are the standard to be judged against. It's like comparing digital cameras to film.Indeed.
That's not a very valid comparison though, since modelers are aiming to emulate tube amps to begin with. Tube amps are the standard to be judged against. It's like comparing digital cameras to film.Indeed.
I see your point.That's not a very valid comparison though, since modelers are aiming to emulate tube amps to begin with. Tube amps are the standard to be judged against. It's like comparing digital cameras to film.

I'm actually oddly qualified to speak to that. Digital cameras are extremely convenient, however they carry a similar drawback to that of modelers: there's always going to be something better, hence they obsolete as technology does. Also, analog forces you to be creative within the confines of the medium. Digital photography makes it too easy in a lot of ways, to just take tons and tons of pics, delete, modify on the fly, etc.I see your point.
Digital cameras are superior in every way
![]()
That's not a very valid comparison though, since modelers are aiming to emulate tube amps to begin with. Tube amps are the standard to be judged against. It's like comparing digital cameras to film.
Okay, that makes two of you, I guess.I never cared what modelers were emulating.
Including activities with dark room partners of the opposite sex in high school photography classes while waiting for chemicals to do their thingAlso, analog forces you to be creative within the confines of the medium.

Okay, that makes two of you, I guess.
Including activities with dark room partners of the opposite sex in high school photography classes while waiting for chemicals to do their thing![]()
“Hey, we’ve got this killer monitor that Jay designed for us. Let’s scrap that and get someone with less-than-Jay’s monitor design expertise to design for us”.Yeah. If this ends up being just another FRFR cab, i'll be really pissed at Chapman for having us waste 11 pages of posts on thin smoke.
Nothing wrong with Atomic FRFRs - i hear they're pretty damn good. But it's hardly an innovative, nor highly requested product.
“Take the Amplifire and give it the Headruah UI” is about as much of a pipe dream as “Take the Headruah make it sound as good as an Axe Fx III with all of the Axe FX IIi’s content” or “Have the Axe Fx available through GC and Sweetwater with 0% interest for 24 months”
With the same IR, they sound extremely close. But the Stomp is going to have a much better interface, way more effects, is still actively developed, has a way better editor, etc.
With this talk of the Firebox sounding bad I thought I would break mine out. I didn't remember it being horrible. I remember preferring the Kemper but I liked the Recto in the Firebox more than the Recto in the Helix.
But the Stomp is going to have a much better interface
For my needs, the Stomp has a way worse interface. It's got only 3 knobs, their ballistics IMO are terribly scaled after the 3.6 update and you don't even see the most relevant parameters on one page, so each and every adjustment turns into a clickfest with lots of chances for errors (as you can't just disable the switches completely from being touch sensitive).
The AFB however is WYSIWYG (at least in my case) and adjusting anything is as easy as it gets.
Sounds like you have your preference.
so the summary of all of this is "Rob Chapman got a job as brand ambassador at Atomic because he needs to pay his bills". Gripping stuff, totally worth it of 12 pages of conversation and surely will get longer. Cool!
so the summary of all of this is "Rob Chapman got a job as brand ambassador at Atomic because he needs to pay his bills". Gripping stuff, totally worth it of 12 pages of conversation and surely will get longer. Cool!