@DrewJD82
I think we’re actually talking past each other.
I’m not defending unfinished products, and I’m not saying companies should be allowed to ship vaporware. What I am saying is that buying a product based on what you hope or assume it will become, and then getting angry when that future doesn’t arrive, isn’t a particularly logical position either.
I agree, but I also have no fucking clue what this has to do with anything I wrote, because I AM talking about companies selling incomplete products.
"Buy it for what it does now" isn’t an anti-consumer sentiment. It’s basic expectation management.
I don’t believe it’s an anti-consumer sentiment, but I absolutely believe it’s a breeding ground for anti-consumer standards and a slippery slope now exists where completed products used to.
If I buy a Quad Cortex knowing it doesn’t support freeform grid routing, while telling myself "they’ll definitely add that later because this is premium gear", that’s on me. I’ve misunderstood the intent of the product and projected a workflow onto it that was never guaranteed.
At that point, getting salty years later because my imagined roadmap didn’t happen isn’t really a failure of the manufacturer - it’s a failure of my own assumptions.
There’s an important distinction here:
• A company failing to deliver explicitly promised features
• A user convincing themselves a product will eventually turn into something else
The first is absolutely fair to criticise.
The second happens all the time, and it’s largely self-inflicted.
Again, I have no fucking clue what this has to do with my posts. I haven’t said anything about what people expect or think should be in an incomplete product. If you think this reply pertains to my post, you are not understanding me.
Yes, if someone buys a product that never once was advertised with a specific feature, then that feature never gets added and the customer is mad, of course they’re a fucking idiot. WTF, why does that even need to be said? I’m dumbfounded as to why you wrote this out twice.
You can oppose "buy now, finish later" and still accept that consumers have a responsibility not to hype themselves into disappointment.
?????????????
Same shit. This has fuck all to do with what I wrote.
Those positions are not mutually exclusive.
See above.
So, again: what did Neural explicitly promise to deliver, and then fail to deliver? It really does matter. Because without that, the discussion just collapses into subjective expectations and emotional reactions rather than anything concrete.
At this point I feel you’re being disingenuous. If you’re going to get into the semantics of “What did they explicitly promise” while ignoring the last 5 years of them failing to deliver in a timely manner, or entirely changing course, so it can be excused away with “Well, they got it done though, right? Maybe not exactly like they said and in the time they said it would happen, but it’s done, right?”, that’s the exact excusing of shitty company behavior I’m taking issue with, that gives them permission to act in an anti-consumer way.
And like it or not, consumer behaviour is a huge part of why the "buy now, finish later" model exists in the first place.
Now I know you’re didn’t read my posts, because if you did, you would have seen this-
I think it absolutely fucking blows that the common consumer is happy* with this model.
And this-
I think it’s irresponsible on the consumer’s end to support that model, rather than demanding the model changes. It’s saying “I will gladly pay you 100% of the cost for 75% of your product and if you don’t get me that last 25%, well, it is what it is and I should stop being entitled to 100% of my money”
No fucking shit, dude. That’s the main point of my posts, the ushering in of the enshittification of the gear world.
As someone looking at shipping a product within the next year, there are really serious considerations I need to make about what goes into version 1.0. If I put too much in it, I miss the deadline. If I put too much in it, I risk the competition beating me to the pip. If I put too much in it, I risk never finishing the thing, and just having it sat on the shelf forever and a day.
As a company making music gear, you do have a responsibility to get your thing out there, get feedback, and then use the feedback to shape the future. You can't build in a vacuum, until something is "perfect" - because perfect, quite simply, is a moving target.
Then I’d suggest companies and builders get all their ducks in a row so no one else beats them to the punch and they don’t have to kickstarter all their products. I don’t see why this is any different than any other business. If I want to sell cakes for a living and I don’t have all the shit I need to sell cakes, I’m not selling any fucking cakes, so it’s my responsibility to ensure I can get everything I need in order to sell cakes. I don’t believe for a second it’s the responsibility of my future customer’s to fund the start up fees of my cake business. Nor should they really have to tell me how to make cakes after I open the business, but that’s a whole other avenue.
But back to the QC - asserting things like 75% complete at launch, is simply projection I'm afraid. As much as I might not have liked it, there were people absolutely cracking on with using the thing, despite that missing 25% of features that you might think was mission critical. The proof is right before your very eyes.
Yep, I covered that, too-
It doesn’t really matter anyway because their customers are so thrilled to not have it they’re lining up for seconds. And before someone uses that last bit as a point of “Shouldn’t that tell you that while the company didn’t deliver what they said they would, what they DID deliver was so good people didn’t care?”, because to that my reply is “You’re merely lucky it worked out that way, there was no guarantee it was going to go this way and this model will always be a gamble, rather than confirmation you’re getting exactly what you want, which I find irresponsible.
And—
They’re so happy with it that a company can sell you a product that’s 75% complete and when you show up for a status update on the remaining 25%, the consumers who got their shit already will tell you you’re entitled, a whiner and you’re the problem, it’s definitely not the company that hasn’t upheld their word. You should just get over it, it’s just the way it is.
@DrewJD82 I get your rant (though I disagree with it) but it seems awfully biased to just NDSP (Given you are posting in this thread)
Feel free to fill me in on the multitude of companies that have done this same thing. I do not know of any others that have strung customers along for 5 years and still have a couple more years left before they actually hit their complete product.
it could as easily apply to Line6 and others
Can it? In any way that’s logically comparable to what we’ve seen from NDSP over the last *5 years*, or are there little bits and pieces one could try to stick in the same category?
- so why not make this rant in the rant section rather than alienating the adults here that have made their choices and gotten their quad cortex's and minis?
Has it been that long that people don’t know anymore?
Gather round, everyone, it’s story time-
About 5 years ago there was a little gear community called the Digital & Modeling subforum at The Gear Page. While often a volatile hangout, things were fairly similar day to day until a new kid in town showed up and their name was NDSP. And they really shook things up a whole bunch for this little gear community. They were big and boastful and bringing lots of attention to themselves and they made a lot of claims around that time that didn’t sit well with some of the community and when those members of the community voiced their concerns and displeasure with those claims, they were
banned from the community!
Feeling a bit pushed out, those community members said “Oh yeah? Well we’re going to go start our own community where no one will ever be banned for speaking out against a company again!” and they went right ahead and did that and anyone is free to visit TGF, where the owners pay out of their own pocket to ensure everyone and anyone who has an issue with a company can voice their concerns about it, even if it doesn’t appease people who like the company.
2nd answer- because I was asked questions in this thread and I wasn’t going to post the answers in another thread. But I get it, you got your shit, you’re happy, I am the problem, I am the whiner, I am entitled.